• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种基于组氨酸丰富蛋白-2 的快速诊断检测试剂、显微镜检查和 PCR 用于指导尼日利亚西南部伊巴丹疟疾治疗的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of three histidine-rich Protein-2 based rapid diagnostic tests, microscopy and PCR for guiding malaria treatment in Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria.

机构信息

Institute of Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan; Department of Pharmacy Technician Studies, Bayelsa State College of Health Technology, Ibadan, Nigeria.

出版信息

Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;24(4):496-504. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_491_20.

DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_491_20
PMID:33851670
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) are the preferred option for programmatic deployment.

AIMS

There are numerous mRDTs on the Nigerian market and there is a need to guide practitioners on the relative performance of the commonly used brands of mRDT in Nigeria.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The performance of three commonly used Histidine-Rich-Protein-2-based mRDTs (SD-Bioline™, Carestart™ and Paracheck-Pf™) against microscopy of Giemsa stained blood and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was evaluated among 190 febrile under-5 children in Ibadan, Nigeria. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy, and agreements.

RESULTS

There were 53.2% males. The prevalence of malaria parasite by microscopy was 46.8% and 57.9% by PCR. Malaria parasite detection by SD-Bioline™ was 60.5%, Carestart™: 60.0% and Paracheck-Pf™ 60.0%. Using microscopy as the gold standard, the sensitivities of SD-Bioline™, Carestart™ and Paracheck-Pf™ mRDT were 97.8%, 96.7% and 97.8% respectively while the specificities were 73.0%, 72.0% and 74.0% respectively. Using PCR as the gold standard, the sensitivity for both SD-Bioline™ and Paracheck-Pf™ was 85.5% and for CareStart was 84.6% while the specificity of SD-Bioline™, Carestart™, and Paracheck-Pf™ was 73.8%, 72.4%, and 75.0% respectively. The test accuracy was 81.0% for both SD-Bioline™ and Paracheck-Pf™ and 80.0% for Caresatrt™. The kappa coefficient of agreement between PCR and each of SD-Bioline™, Carestart, ParaCheck™ and microscopy was 0.597, 0.578, 0.609 and 0.739 respectively.

CONCLUSION

The performance of the three mRDTs is a proof that any of the three is suitable for use in the diagnosis of malaria in the southwest of Nigeria.

摘要

背景

疟疾快速诊断检测(mRDT)是方案部署的首选方案。

目的

尼日利亚市场上有许多 mRDT,有必要指导从业者了解尼日利亚常用 mRDT 品牌的相对性能。

受试者和方法

在尼日利亚伊巴丹,对 190 名发热 5 岁以下儿童进行了三种常用组氨酸丰富蛋白 2 基 mRDT(SD-Bioline™、Carestart™和 Paracheck-Pf™)与吉姆萨染色血镜检和聚合酶链反应(PCR)的比较评估。我们计算了敏感性、特异性、预测值、准确性和一致性。

结果

男性占 53.2%。镜检疟原虫的患病率为 46.8%,PCR 为 57.9%。SD-Bioline™检测疟原虫的比例为 60.5%,Carestart™:60.0%,Paracheck-Pf™:60.0%。以镜检为金标准,SD-Bioline™、Carestart™和 Paracheck-Pf™ mRDT 的敏感性分别为 97.8%、96.7%和 97.8%,特异性分别为 73.0%、72.0%和 74.0%。以 PCR 为金标准,SD-Bioline™和 Paracheck-Pf™的检测灵敏度均为 85.5%,CareStart 为 84.6%,而 SD-Bioline™、Carestart™和 Paracheck-Pf™的特异性分别为 73.8%、72.4%和 75.0%。SD-Bioline™和 Paracheck-Pf™的检测准确率均为 81.0%,CareStart™为 80.0%。PCR 与 SD-Bioline™、Carestart、ParaCheck™和显微镜之间的kappa 一致性系数分别为 0.597、0.578、0.609 和 0.739。

结论

三种 mRDT 的性能证明,在尼日利亚西南部诊断疟疾时,任何一种 mRDT 都适用。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of three histidine-rich Protein-2 based rapid diagnostic tests, microscopy and PCR for guiding malaria treatment in Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria.三种基于组氨酸丰富蛋白-2 的快速诊断检测试剂、显微镜检查和 PCR 用于指导尼日利亚西南部伊巴丹疟疾治疗的比较评估
Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;24(4):496-504. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_491_20.
2
Detecting Plasmodium falciparum in community surveys: a comparison of Paracheck Pf® Test and ICT Malaria Pf® Cassette Test to polymerase chain reaction in Mutasa District, Zimbabwe.在社区调查中检测恶性疟原虫:在津巴布韦穆塔萨区,比较 ParaChek Pf ® 检测和 ICT 疟疾 Pf ® 试剂盒检测与聚合酶链反应。
Malar J. 2021 Jan 6;20(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03536-7.
3
SD-Bioline malaria rapid diagnostic test performance and time to become negative after treatment of malaria infection in Southwest Nigerian Children.尼日利亚西南部儿童疟疾感染治疗后 SD-Bioline 疟疾快速诊断检测的性能和转为阴性的时间。
Ann Afr Med. 2023 Oct-Dec;22(4):470-480. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_220_21.
4
Comparison of the Accuracy of Four Malaria Diagnostic Methods in a High Transmission Setting in Coastal Cameroon.喀麦隆沿海高传播地区四种疟疾诊断方法准确性的比较。
J Parasitol Res. 2019 Mar 10;2019:1417967. doi: 10.1155/2019/1417967. eCollection 2019.
5
Evaluation of Paracheck-Pf(TM) rapid malaria diagnostic test for the diagnosis of malaria among HIV-positive patients in Ibadan, south-western Nigeria.评价 Paracheck-Pf(TM) 快速疟疾诊断检测在尼日利亚西南部伊巴丹地区 HIV 阳性患者疟疾诊断中的应用。
Pathog Glob Health. 2013 Mar;107(2):69-77. doi: 10.1179/2047773213Y.0000000077.
6
Evaluation of the performances of two rapid diagnostic tests (Cyscope®mini and Paracheck-Pf®) in the diagnosis of malaria among febrile children in southwest Nigeria.评价两种快速诊断检测方法(Cyscope®mini 和 Paracheck-Pf®)在尼日利亚西南部发热儿童疟疾诊断中的表现。
Med Princ Pract. 2013;22(3):255-9. doi: 10.1159/000345642. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
7
Evaluation of the utility value of three diagnostic methods in the detection of malaria parasites in endemic area.三种诊断方法在疟疾流行区疟原虫检测中的实用价值评估
Malar J. 2017 May 6;16(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-1838-4.
8
Comparative evaluation of the diagnostic accuracies of four different malaria rapid diagnostic test kits available in Ghana.比较评价加纳市售四种不同疟疾快速诊断试剂盒的诊断准确性。
PLoS One. 2024 May 7;19(5):e0302840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302840. eCollection 2024.
9
Performance of four HRP-2/pLDH combination rapid diagnostic tests and field microscopy as screening tests for malaria in pregnancy in Indonesia: a cross-sectional study.四种HRP-2/pLDH联合快速诊断检测方法及现场显微镜检查用于印度尼西亚孕期疟疾筛查检测的性能:一项横断面研究
Malar J. 2015 Oct 29;14:420. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0943-5.
10
Malaria parasitaemia and mRDT diagnostic performances among symptomatic individuals in selected health care facilities across Ghana.加纳部分医疗机构中有症状个体的疟疾寄生虫血症和快速诊断试验(mRDT)的诊断性能
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 28;21(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10290-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Varying Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test Accuracy by Regional Transmission Level and Demographics in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚不同地区传播水平和人口统计学特征下疟疾快速诊断检测的准确性差异
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 18:2025.07.17.25331734. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.17.25331734.
2
Comparative evaluation of the diagnostic accuracies of four different malaria rapid diagnostic test kits available in Ghana.比较评价加纳市售四种不同疟疾快速诊断试剂盒的诊断准确性。
PLoS One. 2024 May 7;19(5):e0302840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302840. eCollection 2024.
3
The question of the early diagnosis of asymptomatic and subpatent malaria in pregnancy: Implications for diagnostic tools in a malaria endemic area.
孕期无症状及隐性疟疾的早期诊断问题:对疟疾流行地区诊断工具的启示
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023 Sep 2;19:100233. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100233. eCollection 2023 Sep.