From the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawaii (HLL, PM); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia (HLL); Health Sciences Library, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawaii (MKK-H); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (W-HH); Center of Evidence-based Medicine, Department of Education, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (W-HH); Master Program in Long-Term Care and School of Gerontology Health Management, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan (W-HH); and Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan (W-HH).
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Feb 1;101(2):172-178. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001763.
In the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation, there is a continuous need to conduct literature search in advancing evidence-based practice. In addition to the traditional meta-analysis approach, many clinicians have turned their attention to systematic reviews and scoping reviews for research evidence to support clinical practice. In this article, the authors aimed to (1) compare the similarities, differences, pros, and cons between a scoping review, a systematic review, and a meta-analysis and (2) summarize the fundamental stages in conducting a scoping review. Examples of recently published articles relevant to physical medicine and rehabilitation are presented to illustrate the concept and value of scoping reviews.
在物理医学与康复领域，为了推进循证实践，持续需要进行文献检索。除了传统的荟萃分析方法外，许多临床医生还将注意力转向系统评价和范围综述，以获取支持临床实践的研究证据。本文的作者旨在：（1）比较范围综述、系统评价和荟萃分析之间的异同、优缺点；（2）总结进行范围综述的基本阶段。本文还提供了最近发表的与物理医学与康复相关的文章示例，以说明范围综述的概念和价值。
