Taylor Tyson G, Esibov Alexander, Melnick Sharon B, Chapman Fred W, Walcott Gregory P
Stryker Emergency Care, Redmond, WA, United States.
Stryker Emergency Care, Redmond, WA, United States.
Resuscitation. 2021 Jun;163:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.03.035. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
Mechanical chest compression devices allow for variation in chest compression (CCs) characteristics from moment to moment, enabling therapy that is not feasible for manual CCs. Effects of varying compressions over time have not been studied. In a randomized trial in an experimental model of prolonged cardiac arrest, we compared time-varying CPR (TVCPR), alternating between 100 and 200 compressions per minute (cpm) every 6 s, to guidelines CPR (Control).
Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was electrically induced in 20 anesthetized pigs (28.4-45.8 kg). Following 10 min of untreated VF, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) began, randomized to TVCPR or Control. Rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 4-h survival, and hemodynamics during the first 5 min of CPR were compared between groups. Moment-to-moment hemodynamic effects of changing the CC rate were analyzed.
TVCPR improved the proportion of ROSC over time compared to Control (p < 0.05) but ROSC (9/10 vs. 5/10) and 4-h survival (8/10 vs 5/10) did not differ significantly between groups. During CPR, coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures and femoral artery pressure did not differ between groups; however, end-tidal CO and mixed venous O saturation were higher, and pulmonary artery pressure was lower (p < 0.05) for TVCPR than Control. During TVCPR, switching to 100 cpm increased coronary perfusion pressure (p < 0.05), and switching to 200 cpm increased cerebral perfusion pressure (p < 0.05).
Time-varying CPR significantly improved indicators of net forward blood flow and proportion of ROSC over time without negatively impacting perfusion pressures. Alternating CC rate alternates between perfusion pressures favoring the brain and those favoring the heart. Time-varying CPR represents a new avenue of research for optimizing CPR.
University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) Protocol Number 140406860.
机械胸外按压装置可使胸外按压(CCs)的特征随时间变化,从而实现手动胸外按压无法进行的治疗。但随时间变化的按压效果尚未得到研究。在一项针对长时间心脏骤停实验模型的随机试验中,我们将每6秒在每分钟100次和200次按压(cpm)之间交替的时变心肺复苏(TVCPR)与指南心肺复苏(对照组)进行了比较。
对20只麻醉猪(体重28.4 - 45.8千克)进行电诱导室颤(VF)。在未经治疗的室颤持续10分钟后开始心肺复苏(CPR),随机分为TVCPR组或对照组。比较两组自主循环恢复(ROSC)率、4小时生存率以及心肺复苏最初5分钟内的血流动力学情况。分析改变胸外按压速率的瞬间血流动力学效应。
与对照组相比,TVCPR随时间推移提高了ROSC的比例(p < 0.05),但两组间ROSC(9/10对5/10)和4小时生存率(8/10对5/10)无显著差异。在心肺复苏期间,两组间冠状动脉和脑灌注压以及股动脉压无差异;然而,TVCPR组的呼气末二氧化碳分压和混合静脉血氧饱和度更高,肺动脉压更低(p < 0.05)。在TVCPR期间,切换至100 cpm可增加冠状动脉灌注压(p < 0.05),切换至200 cpm可增加脑灌注压(p < 0.05)。
时变心肺复苏随时间显著改善了净向前血流指标和ROSC比例,且未对灌注压产生负面影响。交替的胸外按压速率在有利于大脑和有利于心脏的灌注压之间交替。时变心肺复苏代表了优化心肺复苏的一条新研究途径。
阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校机构动物护理与使用委员会(IACUC)协议编号140,406,860 。