• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于肥胖分类的 DIEP 乳房重建手术风险分层

Stratification of Surgical Risk in DIEP Breast Reconstruction Based on Classification of Obesity.

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center-LCMC Health, New Orleans, Louisiana.

出版信息

J Reconstr Microsurg. 2022 Jan;38(1):1-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1727202. Epub 2021 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1727202
PMID:33853129
Abstract

BACKGROUND

From both a medical and surgical perspective, obese breast cancer patients are considered to possess higher risk when undergoing autologous breast reconstruction relative to nonobese patients. However, few studies have evaluated the continuum of risk across the full range of obesity. This study sought to compare surgical risk between the three World Health Organization (WHO) classes of obesity in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 219 obese patients receiving 306 individual DIEP flaps was performed. Subjects were stratified into WHO obesity classes I (body mass index [BMI]: 30-34), II (BMI: 35-39), and III (BMI: ≥ 40) and assessed for risk factors and postoperative donor and recipient site complications.

RESULTS

When examined together, the rate of any complication between the three groups only trended toward significance ( = 0.07), and there were no significant differences among rates of specific individual complications. However, logistic regression analysis showed that class III obesity was an independent risk factor for both flap (odds ratio [OR]: 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-3.20,  = 0.03) and donor site (OR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.09-5.05,  = 0.03) complications.

CONCLUSION

DIEP breast reconstruction in the obese patient is more complex for both the patient and the surgeon. Although not a contraindication to undergoing surgery, obese patients should be diligently counseled regarding potential complications and undergo preoperative optimization of health parameters. Morbidly obese (class III) patients should be approached with additional caution, and perhaps even delay major reconstruction until specific BMI goals are met.

摘要

背景

从医学和外科角度来看,与非肥胖患者相比,肥胖乳腺癌患者在接受自体乳房重建时被认为具有更高的风险。然而,很少有研究评估过肥胖患者的风险范围。本研究旨在比较三种世界卫生组织(WHO)肥胖分类患者接受腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣(DIEP)乳房重建时的手术风险。

方法

对 219 名接受 306 个 DIEP 皮瓣的肥胖患者进行回顾性研究。受试者分为 WHO 肥胖 I 类(体重指数 [BMI]:30-34)、II 类(BMI:35-39)和 III 类(BMI:≥40),评估风险因素以及术后供区和受区并发症。

结果

三组之间任何并发症的发生率仅呈趋势性差异( = 0.07),且特定个体并发症的发生率无显著差异。然而,逻辑回归分析显示,III 类肥胖是皮瓣(比值比 [OR]:1.71,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.91-3.20,  = 0.03)和供区(OR:2.34,95% CI:1.09-5.05,  = 0.03)并发症的独立危险因素。

结论

肥胖患者的 DIEP 乳房重建对患者和外科医生来说都更加复杂。虽然肥胖不是手术的禁忌症,但应向患者详细说明潜在并发症,并在术前优化健康参数。病态肥胖(III 类)患者应格外谨慎,并可能需要等待达到特定 BMI 目标后再进行主要重建。

相似文献

1
Stratification of Surgical Risk in DIEP Breast Reconstruction Based on Classification of Obesity.基于肥胖分类的 DIEP 乳房重建手术风险分层
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2022 Jan;38(1):1-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1727202. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
2
Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肥胖对采用保留肌肉的腹直肌肌皮瓣、腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣和腹壁下浅动脉皮瓣进行乳房重建术后并发症的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):576-84. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000400.
3
Abdominal wall stability and flap complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: does body mass index make a difference? Analysis of 418 patients and 639 flaps.腹壁稳定性和腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房再造术后皮瓣并发症:体重指数有影响吗?418 例患者和 639 个皮瓣的分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jul;130(1):21e-33e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182547d09.
4
Bipedicle-Conjoined Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction in Overweight and Obese Patients: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks?双叶联体腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣在超重和肥胖患者单侧乳房再造中的应用:收益是否大于风险?
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 Jun;36(5):346-352. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701209. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
5
Complications in unilateral versus bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions: A multicentre study.单侧与双侧腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建的并发症:一项多中心研究。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Sep;69(9):1291-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 May 3.
6
Bilateral breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps in slim patients.瘦型患者应用腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣行双侧乳房再造。
Microsurgery. 2018 Feb;38(2):143-150. doi: 10.1002/micr.30173. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
7
Abdominal donor-site complications following autologous breast reconstruction: A multi-institutional multisurgeon study.自体乳房重建术后腹部供区并发症:一项多机构多外科医生研究。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Mar;90:88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.033. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
8
Impact of body mass index on free DIEP flap breast reconstruction: A multicenter cohort study.体重指数对游离 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建的影响:一项多中心队列研究。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Aug;74(8):1718-1724. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.043. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
9
Higher body mass index is a more important risk factor than sarcopenia for complications in reconstruction of the deep inferior epigastric perforator.对于腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣重建术中的并发症,较高的体重指数是比肌肉减少症更重要的危险因素。
Asian J Surg. 2022 Jan;45(1):360-366. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.06.059. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
10
Are patients with low body mass index candidates for deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction?低体重指数患者是否适合采用腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣进行单侧乳房重建?
Microsurgery. 2015 Sep;35(6):421-7. doi: 10.1002/micr.22407. Epub 2015 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Benefit-Risk Assessment of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Implications for Dermatologists and Plastic Surgeons.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的获益-风险评估:对皮肤科医生和整形外科医生的启示
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01537-5.
2
Risks of Autologous Abdominal Free Flap Breast Reconstruction in Patients With Elevated Body Mass Index.体重指数升高患者自体腹部游离皮瓣乳房重建的风险
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jan 16;13(1):e6457. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006457. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Semiautomatic Quantitative Assessment of DIEP Flap Volume and Thickness for Breast Reconstruction using CTA Data and Implications in Postoperative Complications.
使用CTA数据对用于乳房重建的腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣体积和厚度进行半自动定量评估及其对术后并发症的影响
JPRAS Open. 2024 Oct 16;42:370-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.10.003. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Longitudinal analysis of long-term outcomes of abdominal flap-based microsurgical reconstruction and two-stage prosthetic reconstruction.基于腹壁皮瓣的显微外科重建与两阶段假体重建的长期结局的纵向分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 11;13(1):4062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31218-2.
5
A Novel Fat-Augmented Omentum-Based Construct for Unilateral and Bilateral Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction in Underweight and Normal Weight Women Receiving Nipple or Skin-Sparing Mastectomies.一种新型的基于脂肪增强大网膜的构建物,用于接受乳头或保留皮肤乳房切除术的体重过轻和正常体重女性的单侧和双侧游离皮瓣乳房重建。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):3048-3057. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12975-2. Epub 2022 Dec 25.
6
Textbook outcomes in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a Delphi study to establish consensus.腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术的教科书结局:一项建立共识的德尔菲研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Feb;197(3):559-568. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06820-z. Epub 2022 Nov 28.