Suppr超能文献

使用潜在类别模型对三种用于家畜血清学诊断伯氏考克斯氏体感染的商业化酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测的诊断性能进行评估。

Evaluation using latent class models of the diagnostic performances of three ELISA tests commercialized for the serological diagnosis of Coxiella burnetii infection in domestic ruminants.

作者信息

Lurier Thibaut, Rousset Elodie, Gasqui Patrick, Sala Carole, Claustre Clément, Abrial David, Dufour Philippe, de Crémoux Renée, Gache Kristel, Delignette-Muller Marie Laure, Ayral Florence, Jourdain Elsa

机构信息

UMR EPIA, Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE,VetAgro Sup, route de Theix, 63122, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France.

Usc 1233 RS2GP, Université de Lyon, INRAE,VetAgro Sup, 1 avenue bourgelat, 69280, Marcy l'Etoile, France.

出版信息

Vet Res. 2021 Apr 14;52(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13567-021-00926-w.

Abstract

ELISA methods are the diagnostic tools recommended for the serological diagnosis of Coxiella burnetii infection in ruminants but their respective diagnostic performances are difficult to assess because of the absence of a gold standard. This study focused on three commercial ELISA tests with the following objectives (1) assess their sensitivity and specificity in sheep, goats and cattle, (2) assess the between- and within-herd seroprevalence distribution in these species, accounting for diagnostic errors, and (3) estimate optimal sample sizes considering sensitivity and specificity at herd level. We comparatively tested 1413 cattle, 1474 goat and 1432 sheep serum samples collected in France. We analyzed the cross-classified test results with a hierarchical zero-inflated beta-binomial latent class model considering each herd as a population and conditional dependence as a fixed effect. Potential biases and coverage probabilities of the model were assessed by simulation. Conditional dependence for truly seropositive animals was high in all species for two of the three ELISA methods. Specificity estimates were high, ranging from 94.8% [92.1; 97.8] to 99.2% [98.5; 99.7], whereas sensitivity estimates were generally low, ranging from 39.3 [30.7; 47.0] to 90.5% [83.3; 93.8]. Between- and within-herd seroprevalence estimates varied greatly among geographic areas and herds. Overall, goats showed higher within-herd seroprevalence levels than sheep and cattle. The optimal sample size maximizing both herd sensitivity and herd specificity varied from 3 to at least 20 animals depending on the test and ruminant species. This study provides better interpretation of three widely used commercial ELISA tests and will make it possible to optimize their implementation in future studies. The methodology developed may likewise be applied to other human or animal diseases.

摘要

酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)方法是反刍动物中推荐用于伯氏考克斯体感染血清学诊断的诊断工具,但由于缺乏金标准,难以评估它们各自的诊断性能。本研究聚焦于三种商业ELISA检测,目标如下:(1)评估其在绵羊、山羊和牛中的敏感性和特异性;(2)考虑诊断误差,评估这些物种群体间和群体内的血清阳性率分布;(3)估计在群体水平考虑敏感性和特异性时的最佳样本量。我们对在法国收集的1413份牛血清样本、1474份山羊血清样本和1432份绵羊血清样本进行了比较检测。我们使用分层零膨胀贝塔二项式潜在类别模型分析交叉分类的检测结果,将每个畜群视为一个总体,并将条件依赖性作为固定效应。通过模拟评估模型的潜在偏差和覆盖概率。在三种ELISA方法中的两种方法中,所有物种中真正血清阳性动物的条件依赖性都很高。特异性估计值较高,范围从94.8%[92.1;97.8]到99.2%[98.5;99.7],而敏感性估计值通常较低,范围从39.3%[30.7;47.0]到90.5%[83.3;93.8]。群体间和群体内的血清阳性率估计在不同地理区域和畜群之间差异很大。总体而言,山羊群体内的血清阳性率水平高于绵羊和牛。根据检测方法和反刍动物物种的不同,使群体敏感性和群体特异性最大化的最佳样本量从3只到至少20只动物不等。本研究对三种广泛使用的商业ELISA检测进行了更好的解读,并将使未来研究中优化其应用成为可能。所开发的方法同样可应用于其他人类或动物疾病。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7df/8048088/c37444a0b842/13567_2021_926_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验