• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Peripherally Inserted Central catheter iNnovation to reduce Infections and Clots (the PICNIC trial): a randomised controlled trial protocol.外周置入中心静脉导管减少感染和血栓形成创新研究(PICNIC试验):一项随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 14;11(4):e042475. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042475.
2
Peripherally inserted central catheter design and material for reducing catheter failure and complications.用于减少导管故障和并发症的外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的设计与材料
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 28;6(6):CD013366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013366.pub2.
3
Peripherally InSerted CEntral catheter dressing and securement in patients with cancer: the PISCES trial. Protocol for a 2x2 factorial, superiority randomised controlled trial.癌症患者外周置入中心静脉导管的敷料与固定:双鱼座试验。一项2×2析因、优效性随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 15;7(6):e015291. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015291.
4
Central venous Access device SeCurement And Dressing Effectiveness for peripherally inserted central catheters in adult acute hospital patients (CASCADE): a pilot randomised controlled trial.成人急性医院患者外周静脉置入中心静脉导管的中心静脉通路装置固定与敷料有效性研究(CASCADE):一项试点随机对照试验
Trials. 2017 Oct 4;18(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2207-x.
5
A comparison of hydrophobic polyurethane and polyurethane peripherally inserted central catheter: results from a feasibility randomized controlled trial.疏水性聚氨酯与聚氨酯外周置入中心静脉导管的比较:一项可行性随机对照试验的结果。
Trials. 2020 Sep 14;21(1):787. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04699-z.
6
Preventing adverse events during paediatric cancer treatment: protocol for a multi-site hybrid randomised controlled trial of catheter lock solutions (the CLOCK trial).预防儿科癌症治疗中的不良事件:导管锁溶液的多中心混合随机对照试验方案(CLOCK 试验)。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 9;14(7):e085637. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085637.
7
Do antimicrobial and antithrombogenic peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) materials prevent catheter complications? An analysis of 42,562 hospitalized medical patients.具有抗菌和抗血栓形成特性的外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)材料能否预防导管相关并发症?对42562例住院内科患者的分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Apr;43(4):427-434. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.141. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
8
Subcutaneous tunnelling versus conventional insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized patients (TUNNEL-PICC): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.皮下隧道与传统经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管在住院患者中的应用比较(TUNNEL-PICC):一项随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Sep 15;23(1):781. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06682-2.
9
Patterns of use and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A multicenter study.住院固体肿瘤患者中经外周插入中心静脉导管的使用模式和结局:一项多中心研究。
Cancer. 2022 Oct;128(20):3681-3690. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34410. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
10
Peripherally inserted central catheter-related deep vein thrombosis: contemporary patterns and predictors.经外周插入中心静脉导管相关的深静脉血栓形成:当代的模式和预测因素。
J Thromb Haemost. 2014 Jun;12(6):847-54. doi: 10.1111/jth.12549.

引用本文的文献

1
Perils of the PICC: Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Associated Complications and Recommendations for Prevention in Clinical Practice-A Narrative Review.经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管的风险:临床实践中与经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管相关的并发症及预防建议——一篇叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;13(16):1993. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161993.
2
Construction and validation of a nomogram prediction model for the catheter-related thrombosis risk of central venous access devices in patients with cancer: a prospective machine learning study.癌症患者中心静脉通路装置导管相关血栓形成风险的列线图预测模型的构建与验证:一项前瞻性机器学习研究
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Feb;58(2):220-231. doi: 10.1007/s11239-024-03045-3. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
3
Preventing adverse events during paediatric cancer treatment: protocol for a multi-site hybrid randomised controlled trial of catheter lock solutions (the CLOCK trial).预防儿科癌症治疗中的不良事件:导管锁溶液的多中心混合随机对照试验方案(CLOCK 试验)。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 9;14(7):e085637. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085637.
4
Application of Nursing Intervention Based on Intelligent Grip Strength System in Patients with Tumor PICC: A Case-Control Study on Promoting Functional Exercise and Quality of Life.基于智能握力系统的护理干预在肿瘤 PICC 患者中的应用:促进功能锻炼和生活质量的病例对照研究。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Apr 22;2022:8016567. doi: 10.1155/2022/8016567. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a paediatric central venous access device database: A retrospective cohort study of practice evolution and risk factors for device failure.儿科中心静脉通路装置数据库的建立:一项关于实践演变和装置故障风险因素的回顾性队列研究。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Feb;56(2):289-297. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14600. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
2
Antithrombogenic peripherally inserted central catheters: overview of efficacy and safety.抗血栓外周置入中心静脉导管:疗效和安全性概述。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019 Jan;16(1):25-33. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1555466. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
3
How Does Your PICCOMPARE? A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Various PICC Materials in Pediatrics.您的经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)情况如何比较?一项比较儿科各种PICC材料的随机对照试验试点研究。
J Hosp Med. 2018 Aug 1;13(8):517-525. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2911. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
4
Insertion site assessment of peripherally inserted central catheters: Inter-observer agreement between nurses and inpatients.外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管置入部位评估:护士与住院患者之间的观察者间一致性
J Vasc Access. 2018 Jul;19(4):370-374. doi: 10.1177/1129729818757965. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
5
The Michigan Risk Score to predict peripherally inserted central catheter-associated thrombosis.密歇根风险评分预测外周静脉置入中心静脉导管相关性血栓。
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Oct;15(10):1951-1962. doi: 10.1111/jth.13794. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
6
Peripherally InSerted CEntral catheter dressing and securement in patients with cancer: the PISCES trial. Protocol for a 2x2 factorial, superiority randomised controlled trial.癌症患者外周置入中心静脉导管的敷料与固定:双鱼座试验。一项2×2析因、优效性随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 15;7(6):e015291. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015291.
7
Are antimicrobial peripherally inserted central catheters associated with reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infection? A systematic review and meta-analysis.抗菌外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管与中心静脉导管相关血流感染的减少有关吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Feb 1;45(2):108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
8
Central venous Access device SeCurement And Dressing Effectiveness (CASCADE) in paediatrics: protocol for pilot randomised controlled trials.儿科中心静脉通路装置固定与敷料有效性(CASCADE):随机对照试验的试验方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 3;6(6):e011197. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011197.
9
Dressing and securement for central venous access devices (CVADs): A Cochrane systematic review.中心静脉通路装置(CVAD)的敷料和固定:一项 Cochrane 系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Jul;59:177-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 Apr 24.
10
Catheter impregnation, coating or bonding for reducing central venous catheter-related infections in adults.用于降低成人中心静脉导管相关感染的导管浸渍、涂层或粘结
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 16;3(3):CD007878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007878.pub3.

外周置入中心静脉导管减少感染和血栓形成创新研究(PICNIC试验):一项随机对照试验方案

Peripherally Inserted Central catheter iNnovation to reduce Infections and Clots (the PICNIC trial): a randomised controlled trial protocol.

作者信息

Ullman Amanda J, August Deanne, Kleidon Tricia, Walker Rachel, Marsh Nicole M, Bulmer Andrew, Pearch Benjamin, Runnegar Naomi, Schults Jessica A, Leema Joanne, Lee-Archer Paul, Biles Cathy, Southam Katrina, Gibson Victoria, Byrnes Joshua, Ware Robert S, Chopra Vineet, Coulthard Alan, Mollee Peter, Rickard Claire M, Harris Patrick N A

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 14;11(4):e042475. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042475.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042475
PMID:33853797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8054085/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are vital for the delivery of medical therapies, but up to 30% of PICCs are associated with complications such as deep vein thrombosis or infection. The integration of antimicrobial and hydrophobic catheter materials, and pressure-activated valves, into polyurethane PICCs are innovations designed to prevent infective and/or thrombotic complications.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A multicentre, parallel group, superiority randomised controlled trial with two experimental arms ((1) hydrophobic PICC (with pressure-activated valve); (2) chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated PICC (with external clamp)) and one control group ((3) conventional polyurethane PICC (with external clamp)). Recruitment of 1098 adult and paediatric patients will take place over 2 years at three tertiary-referral hospitals in Queensland, Australia. Patients are eligible for inclusion if their PICC is to be inserted for medical treatment, with a vascular size sufficient to support a 4-Fr PICC or larger, and with informed consent. The primary outcome is , a composite of thrombotic (venous thrombosis, breakage and occlusion) and infective complications (PICC-associated bloodstream infection and local infection). Secondary outcomes include: all-cause PICC complication; thrombotic complications; infective complications; adverse events (local or systemic reaction); PICC dwell time; patient/parent satisfaction; and healthcare costs. Differences between both intervention groups and the control group will be compared using Cox proportional hazards regression. Effect estimates will be presented as HRs with corresponding 95% CI.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval from Queensland Health (HREC/QCHQ/48682) and Griffith University (Ref. No. 2019/094). Results will be published.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12619000022167.

摘要

引言

经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)对于实施医学治疗至关重要,但高达30%的PICC会引发诸如深静脉血栓形成或感染等并发症。将抗菌和疏水导管材料以及压力激活阀整合到聚氨酯PICC中,是旨在预防感染性和/或血栓性并发症的创新举措。

方法与分析

一项多中心、平行组、优效性随机对照试验,设有两个试验组((1) 疏水PICC(带压力激活阀);(2) 葡萄糖酸氯己定浸渍PICC(带外部夹))和一个对照组((3) 传统聚氨酯PICC(带外部夹))。将在澳大利亚昆士兰州的三家三级转诊医院,于2年时间内招募1098名成人和儿科患者。如果患者因医疗需要插入PICC,血管尺寸足以支撑4F或更大尺寸的PICC,且已获得知情同意,则符合纳入条件。主要结局是血栓形成(静脉血栓形成、破损和堵塞)和感染性并发症(PICC相关血流感染和局部感染)的综合情况。次要结局包括:全因PICC并发症;血栓形成并发症;感染性并发症;不良事件(局部或全身反应);PICC留置时间;患者/家长满意度;以及医疗费用。将使用Cox比例风险回归比较两个干预组与对照组之间的差异。效应估计值将以风险比(HR)及相应的95%置信区间表示。

伦理与传播

获得昆士兰卫生部门(HREC/QCHQ/48682)和格里菲斯大学(参考编号:2019/094)的伦理批准。研究结果将予以发表。

试验注册号

ACTRN12619000022167。