• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性膀胱切除术后的短期发病率和死亡率:一项系统评价。

Short-term morbidity and mortality following radical cystectomy: a systematic review.

作者信息

Maibom Sophia Liff, Joensen Ulla Nordström, Poulsen Alicia Martin, Kehlet Henrik, Brasso Klaus, Røder Martin Andreas

机构信息

Department of Urology, Urological Research Unit, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 14;11(4):e043266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043266.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043266
PMID:33853799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8054090/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study short-term (<90 days) morbidity and mortality following radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer and identify modifiable risk factors associated with these.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for relevant papers on 11 June 2019 and rerun on 27 May 2020. Studies reporting complications, reoperations, length of stay and mortality within 90 days were included. Studies were reviewed according to criteria from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and the quality of evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

The search retrieved 1957 articles. Sixty-six articles were included. The quality of evidence was poor to good. Most studies were retrospective, and no randomised clinical trials were identified. Of included studies a median of 6 Martin criteria for reporting complications after surgery were fulfilled. The Clavien-Dindo classification for grading complications was most frequently used. The weighted overall complication rate after RC was 34.9% (range 28.8-68.8) for in-house complications, 39.0% (range 27.3-80.0) for 30-day complications and 58.5% (range 36.1-80.5) for 90-day complications. The most common types of complications reported were gastrointestinal (29.0%) and infectious (26.4%). The weighted mortality rate was 2.4% (range 0.9-4.7) for in-house mortality, 2.1% (0.0-3.7) for 30-day mortality and 4.7% (range 0.0-7.0) for 90-day mortality. Age and comorbidity were identified as the best predictors for complications following RC.

CONCLUSION

Short-term morbidity and mortality are high following RC. Reporting of complications is heterogeneous and the quality of evidence is generally low. There is a continuous need for randomised studies to address any intervention that can reduce morbidity and mortality following RC.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

摘要

目的

研究膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术(RC)后的短期(<90天)发病率和死亡率,并确定与之相关的可改变风险因素。

设计

系统评价。

方法

按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行系统评价。于2019年6月11日在PubMed和EMBASE上检索相关论文,并于2020年5月27日重新检索。纳入报告90天内并发症、再次手术、住院时间和死亡率的研究。根据牛津循证医学中心的标准对研究进行综述,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估证据质量。

结果

检索到1957篇文章。纳入66篇文章。证据质量从差到好。大多数研究为回顾性研究,未识别出随机临床试验。纳入研究中,术后并发症报告的马丁标准中位数为6条。并发症分级最常使用Clavien-Dindo分类法。RC术后院内并发症加权总发生率为34.9%(范围28.8 - 68.8),30天并发症发生率为39.0%(范围27.3 - 80.0),90天并发症发生率为58.5%(范围36.1 - 80.5)。报告的最常见并发症类型为胃肠道(29.0%)和感染性(26.4%)。院内死亡率加权发生率为2.4%(范围0.9 - 4.7),30天死亡率为2.1%(0.0 - 3.7),90天死亡率为4.7%(范围0.0 - 7.0)。年龄和合并症被确定为RC术后并发症的最佳预测因素。

结论

RC术后短期发病率和死亡率较高。并发症报告存在异质性,证据质量普遍较低。持续需要进行随机研究以探讨任何可降低RC术后发病率和死亡率的干预措施。

PROSPERO注册号:104937。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3e/8054090/20d9279fb739/bmjopen-2020-043266f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3e/8054090/20d9279fb739/bmjopen-2020-043266f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3e/8054090/20d9279fb739/bmjopen-2020-043266f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Short-term morbidity and mortality following radical cystectomy: a systematic review.根治性膀胱切除术后的短期发病率和死亡率:一项系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 14;11(4):e043266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043266.
2
Clinical markers of morbidity, mortality and survival in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy. A systematic review.根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者的发病率、死亡率和生存率的临床标志物:系统评价。
Scand J Urol. 2020 Aug;54(4):267-276. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2020.1773527. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
3
Improving Estimates of Perioperative Morbidity After Radical Cystectomy Using the European Association of Urology Quality Criteria for Standardized Reporting and Introducing the Comprehensive Complication Index.利用欧洲泌尿外科学会标准化报告质量标准并引入综合并发症指数改善根治性膀胱切除术后围手术期发病率的评估
Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
4
Impact of Smoking Habit on Perioperative Morbidity in Patients Treated with Radical Cystectomy for Urothelial Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.吸烟习惯对接受根治性膀胱切除术治疗尿路上皮膀胱癌患者围手术期发病率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Aug;4(4):580-593. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
5
Predicting morbidity and mortality after radical cystectomy using risk calculators: A comprehensive review of the literature.使用风险计算器预测根治性膀胱切除术的发病率和死亡率:文献综述。
Urol Oncol. 2021 Feb;39(2):109-120. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.09.032. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
6
The comprehensive complication index is associated with a significant increase in complication severity between 30 and 90 days after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.综合并发症指数与膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后 30 至 90 天之间并发症严重程度的显著增加相关。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 May;47(5):1163-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.040. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
7
Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology.采用标准化报告方法定义膀胱癌根治性切除术患者的早期发病率。
Eur Urol. 2009 Jan;55(1):164-74. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.031. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
8
Does the Use of a Robot Decrease the Complication Rate Adherent to Radical Cystectomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Open with Robotic Counterparts.机器人的使用是否会降低根治性膀胱切除术相关并发症的发生率?一项比较开放手术与机器人手术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2019 Dec;33(12):971-984. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0226. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
9
In-depth Critical Analysis of Complications Following Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术并体腔内尿流改道术相关并发症的深入批判性分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Apr;3(2-3):273-279. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
10
Frailty impact on postoperative complications and early mortality rates in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review.衰弱对膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术患者术后并发症和早期死亡率的影响:一项系统评价
Arab J Urol. 2020 Nov 2;19(1):9-23. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1841538.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Therapeutic Efficacy of Intravesical Xenogeneic Urothelial Cell Treatment Alone and in Combination with Chemotherapy or Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in a Mouse Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Model.在小鼠非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌模型中评估膀胱内异种源尿路上皮细胞单独治疗以及联合化疗或免疫检查点抑制治疗的疗效。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 24;17(15):2448. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152448.
2
Safety of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Real-World Analysis Using the National Clinical Database in Japan.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的安全性:一项使用日本国家临床数据库的真实世界分析。
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(15):e71109. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71109.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Reporting Radical Cystectomy Outcomes Following Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.报告实施强化术后康复方案后根治性膀胱切除术结局:系统评价和个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2020 Nov;78(5):719-730. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.039. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
2
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion decreases postoperative complications only in highly comorbid patients: findings that rely on a standardized methodology recommended by the European Association of Urology Guidelines.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道术仅在高度合并症患者中可降低术后并发症:这一发现基于欧洲泌尿外科学会指南推荐的标准化方法。
World J Urol. 2021 Mar;39(3):803-812. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03237-5. Epub 2020 May 17.
3
Survival Outcomes in Bladder Cancer: An Ambispective Study of Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.
膀胱癌的生存结局:一项对接受根治性膀胱切除术患者的双向性研究。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 28;17(6):e86938. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86938. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Sarcopenia in Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.尿路上皮膀胱癌中的肌肉减少症:一项叙述性综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 20;61(7):1307. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071307.
5
Multicentre, open-label, phase IV, randomised trial testing superiority of individualised targeted antibiotic prophylaxis over empiric prophylaxis at ureteral stent removal following cystectomy: study protocol for the REINFORCE trial.多中心、开放标签、IV期随机试验:在膀胱切除术后输尿管支架取出时,测试个体化靶向抗生素预防相对于经验性预防的优越性:REINFORCE试验的研究方案
Trials. 2025 Jul 28;26(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08981-w.
6
Use of Rectal Diazepam to Prevent Bladder Spasms and Leakage of Medication During Intravesical Administration of Nadofaragene Firadenovec for BCG-Unresponsive Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.在膀胱内给予纳多法基因菲拉地诺韦治疗卡介苗无反应的非肌层浸润性膀胱癌时,使用直肠地西泮预防膀胱痉挛和药物渗漏。
J Urol. 2025 Jun 26:101097JU0000000000004658. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004658.
7
Impact of Perioperative Fluid Strategies on Outcomes in Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review.围手术期液体管理策略对根治性膀胱切除术预后的影响:一项系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 22;17(11):1746. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111746.
8
Postoperative complications, emergency department utilisation, and readmission after radical cystectomy.根治性膀胱切除术后的术后并发症、急诊科就诊情况及再入院情况。
Cent European J Urol. 2025;78(1):5-13. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2024.0166. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
9
Readmission and unplanned healthcare use after radical cystectomy are independent of discharge destination.根治性膀胱切除术后的再入院和非计划性医疗保健使用与出院目的地无关。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2025 May;19(5):E172-E178. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8989.
10
Essential Japanese Guidelines for the Prevention of Perioperative Infections in the Urological Field: 2023 Edition.《日本泌尿外科领域围手术期感染预防基本指南:2023年版》
Int J Urol. 2025 Jun;32(6):621-632. doi: 10.1111/iju.70026. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
Outcomes of an enhanced recovery after radical cystectomy program in a prospective multicenter study: compliance and key components for success.一项前瞻性多中心研究中根治性膀胱切除术术后加速康复方案的结果:依从性和成功的关键因素。
World J Urol. 2020 Dec;38(12):3121-3129. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03132-z. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
4
Early recovery after surgery for radical cystectomy: comprehensive assessment and meta-analysis of existing protocols.根治性膀胱切除术术后早期恢复:现有方案的综合评估和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2020 Dec;38(12):3139-3153. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03133-y. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
5
The Importance of Hospital and Surgeon Volume as Major Determinants of Morbidity and Mortality After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Recommendations by the European Association of Urology Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer Guideline Panel.根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌后发病率和死亡率的主要决定因素:医院和外科医生手术量的重要性:欧洲泌尿外科学会肌肉浸润性和转移性膀胱癌指南小组的系统评价和建议。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Apr;3(2):131-144. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
6
Robotic versus open radical cystectomy throughout the learning phase: insights from a real-life multicenter study.机器人与开放根治性膀胱切除术在学习阶段的比较:来自真实多中心研究的见解。
World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1951-1958. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02998-y. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
7
Large Single Institution Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Complications of Open Radical Cystectomy, Intracorporeal Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Robotic Extracorporeal Approach.大型单机构比较:开放性根治性膀胱切除术、体腔内机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术和机器人体外方法的围手术期结果和并发症。
J Urol. 2020 Mar;203(3):512-521. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000570. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
8
Comparison of Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes.腹腔镜与机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:围手术期和肿瘤学结果比较。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Oct;17(5):e1048-e1053. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
9
Effect of hospital volume on 90-day mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in Spain.西班牙根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌后 90 天死亡率与医院容量的关系。
World J Urol. 2020 May;38(5):1221-1228. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02874-9. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
10
Identifying and Codifying Complications after Radical Cystectomy: Comparison of Administrative Diagnostic and Procedure Codes, and Clinical Chart Review.根治性膀胱切除术术后并发症的识别和编码:行政诊断和操作代码与临床图表审查的比较。
J Urol. 2019 Nov;202(5):913-919. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000398. Epub 2019 Oct 9.