• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对英格兰国民保健服务体系(NHS)和苏格兰国民保健服务体系中具有全国重要性的感染预防与控制文件的比较。

A comparison of the nationally important infection prevention and control documents in NHS England and NHS Scotland.

作者信息

Curran Evonne T, Burnett Emma, Robinson Jude, Loveday Heather

机构信息

Independent Infection Control Nurse Consultant.

University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

J Infect Prev. 2021 Mar;22(2):75-82. doi: 10.1177/1757177420971849. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1177/1757177420971849
PMID:33854563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8014007/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The devolution of health to Scotland in 1999, led for the first time in the NHS, to different priorities and success indicators for infection prevention and control (IPC). This project sought to understand, compare and evaluate the national IPC priorities and available indicators of success.

AIM

To identify the national IPC priorities alongside national indicators of success.

METHODS

Critical analysis of nationally produced documents and publicly available infection-related data up to March 2018.

FINDINGS

For both NHS Scotland and England the local and national IPC priorities are evidenced by: (1) people being cared for in an IPC-safe environment; (2) staff following IPC-safe procedures; and (3) organisations continuously striving not just to attain standards, but to improve on them. If national agencies that produce data were also charged with using a Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) model, then there would be further opportunities to detect and improve on successes.

摘要

背景

1999年,医疗服务下放至苏格兰,这在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中首次导致了感染预防与控制(IPC)方面不同的优先事项和成功指标。该项目旨在了解、比较和评估国家层面的IPC优先事项及可用的成功指标。

目的

确定国家层面的IPC优先事项以及国家层面的成功指标。

方法

对截至2018年3月国家编制的文件和公开可得的感染相关数据进行批判性分析。

研究结果

对于苏格兰NHS和英格兰而言,地方和国家层面的IPC优先事项体现在以下方面:(1)人们在一个符合IPC安全标准的环境中接受护理;(2)工作人员遵循符合IPC安全标准的程序;(3)各机构不仅持续努力达到标准,还力求改进标准。如果负责生成数据的国家机构也被要求采用持续质量改进(CQI)模式,那么将有更多机会发现成功之处并加以改进。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the nationally important infection prevention and control documents in NHS England and NHS Scotland.对英格兰国民保健服务体系(NHS)和苏格兰国民保健服务体系中具有全国重要性的感染预防与控制文件的比较。
J Infect Prev. 2021 Mar;22(2):75-82. doi: 10.1177/1757177420971849. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
2
Rapid evaluation of the Special Measures for Quality and challenged provider regimes: a mixed-methods study.快速评估质量特别措施和有问题的供应商制度:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(19):1-139. doi: 10.3310/GQQV3512.
3
Designing an optimal infection prevention service: Part 1.设计最佳感染预防服务:第1部分。
J Infect Prev. 2023 Jan;24(1):3-10. doi: 10.1177/17571774221127695. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
Infection prevention and control self-audit: just a tick box exercise?感染预防与控制自我审核:只是一项打勾任务吗?
J Infect Prev. 2014 Mar;15(2):64-68. doi: 10.1177/1757177413512388. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
5
Home Health Staff Perspectives on Infection Prevention and Control: Implications for Coronavirus Disease 2019.家庭保健人员对感染预防与控制的观点:对 2019 年冠状病毒病的启示。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Dec;21(12):1782-1790.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.026. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
6
What happens after an NHS Health Check? A survey and realist review.NHS 健康检查后会发生什么?一项调查和现实主义综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(12):1-133. doi: 10.3310/RGTH4127.
7
How widely has ANTT been adopted in NHS hospitals and community care organisations in England and Scotland?在英格兰和苏格兰的国民保健制度医院和社区护理组织中,ANTT 被广泛采用了吗?
Br J Nurs. 2020 Sep 10;29(16):924-932. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2020.29.16.924.
8
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
9
Developing and implementing an infection prevention and control program for a COVID-19 alternative care site in Philadelphia, PA.在宾夕法尼亚州费城开发和实施一个 COVID-19 替代护理场所的感染预防和控制计划。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jan;49(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.07.006. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
10
Infection Prevention and Control Programs in US Nursing Homes: Results of a National Survey.美国养老院的感染预防与控制项目:一项全国性调查结果
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Jan;17(1):85-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.10.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying research priorities for infection prevention and control. A mixed methods study with a convergent design.确定感染预防与控制的研究重点:一项采用融合设计的混合方法研究。
J Infect Prev. 2024 May;25(3):59-65. doi: 10.1177/17571774241230676. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
2
Designing an optimal infection prevention service: Part 1.设计最佳感染预防服务:第1部分。
J Infect Prev. 2023 Jan;24(1):3-10. doi: 10.1177/17571774221127695. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
3
Designing an optimal infection prevention service: Part 2.设计优化的感染预防服务:第2部分。
J Infect Prev. 2023 Jan;24(1):11-22. doi: 10.1177/17571774221127573. Epub 2022 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The nadir that brought about national infection prevention and control policy.引发国家感染预防与控制政策的最低点。
J Infect Prev. 2021 Mar;22(2):59-61. doi: 10.1177/1757177420982043. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
2
Enhanced surveillance of Escherichia coli healthcare-associated bloodstream infections - how many are preventable?
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Sep;100(1):65-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.05.020. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
3
Waves of trouble: MRSA strain dynamics and assessment of the impact of infection control.一波又一波的麻烦:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌株动态及其对感染控制效果的评估。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Dec;66(12):2685-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr392. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
4
The NHS after devolution.权力下放后的国民保健制度。
BMJ. 1999 May 1;318(7192):1155-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7192.1155.
5
Statistical quality control methods in infection control and hospital epidemiology, part I: Introduction and basic theory.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998 Mar;19(3):194-214. doi: 10.1086/647795.
6
The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals.美国医院感染监测与控制项目在预防医院感染方面的成效。
Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Feb;121(2):182-205. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113990.