Koh J Y, Choi D W
Department of Neurology, Stanford University Medical Center, California 94305.
J Neurosci. 1988 Jun;8(6):2153-63. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-06-02153.1988.
Quantitative concentration-toxicity relationships were determined for the injury of cultured murine cortical neurons by several excitatory amino acid (EAA) agonists. All tested agonists produced concentration-dependent neuronal injury at concentrations between 1 and 1000 microM. With 5 min exposure, glutamate, aspartate, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), L-homocysteate (HCA), and quisqualate all had similar potencies, destroying half of the neuronal population (LD50) at concentrations of 50-200 microM, and similar efficacies, with 88-92% neuronal loss produced by exposure to high agonist concentrations. Quinolinate and kainate were substantially weaker toxins, producing only 20-30% neuronal loss after 5 min exposure to 3 mM concentrations; with prolonged (24 hr) exposure, 85-95% neuronal loss could be attained. The comparative EAA vulnerability of a specific cortical neuronal subpopulation containing high concentrations of the enzyme, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate diaphorase (NADPH-d), was also examined. Glutamate had no differential toxicity on these cells, damaging them at all concentrations in proportion to the general population; however, other, more selective, agonists produced strikingly differential injuries. These NADPH-d-containing [NADPH-d(+)]neurons were selectively resistant to damage by low concentrations of the NMDA agonists quinolinate, HCA, aspartate, or NMDA itself. By contrast, NADPH-d(+)neurons were selectively destroyed by concentrations of quisqualate or kainate too low to produce much general neuronal injury. The differential susceptibility of these neurons was not absolute, as high concentrations of all tested agonists produced nonselective neuronal injury. In light of recent evidence that forebrain NADPH-d(+)neurons are selectively spared in Huntington's disease, the present study continues to support the hypothesis that neuronal loss in Huntington's disease might result from excessive NMDA-receptor stimulation by any selective NMDA agonist. Furthermore, the demonstration that the differential susceptibility of NADPH-d(+)neurons is agonist concentration-dependent, rather than absolute, could provide a basis for explaining some existing conflicting experimental data.
测定了几种兴奋性氨基酸(EAA)激动剂对培养的小鼠皮质神经元损伤的定量浓度-毒性关系。所有测试的激动剂在1至1000微摩尔浓度范围内均产生浓度依赖性神经元损伤。暴露5分钟时,谷氨酸、天冬氨酸、N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)、L-高半胱氨酸(HCA)和喹啉酸的效力相似,在50至200微摩尔浓度下破坏一半的神经元群体(半数致死剂量),且效力相似,高浓度激动剂暴露导致88%至92%的神经元损失。喹啉酸和海人酸是较弱的毒素,在3毫摩尔浓度下暴露5分钟后仅导致20%至30%的神经元损失;长时间(24小时)暴露后,可导致85%至95%的神经元损失。还研究了含有高浓度还原型烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸磷酸黄递酶(NADPH-d)的特定皮质神经元亚群对EAA的相对易损性。谷氨酸对这些细胞没有差异毒性,在所有浓度下对它们的损伤与总体细胞成比例;然而,其他更具选择性的激动剂产生了明显不同的损伤。这些含NADPH-d [NADPH-d(+)]的神经元对低浓度的NMDA激动剂喹啉酸、HCA、天冬氨酸或NMDA本身具有选择性抗损伤能力。相比之下,NADPH-d(+)神经元被喹啉酸或海人酸的浓度选择性破坏,而这些浓度过低以至于不会造成大量一般性神经元损伤。这些神经元的差异易感性并非绝对,因为所有测试激动剂的高浓度都会产生非选择性神经元损伤。鉴于最近的证据表明前脑NADPH-d(+)神经元在亨廷顿病中选择性地未受影响,本研究继续支持以下假设:亨廷顿病中的神经元损失可能是由任何选择性NMDA激动剂过度刺激NMDA受体所致。此外,NADPH-d(+)神经元的差异易感性是激动剂浓度依赖性而非绝对的这一证明,可为解释一些现有的相互矛盾的实验数据提供基础。