• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人多维呼吸困难量表的效度与信度

Validity and reliability of the Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile in older adults.

作者信息

Hegendörfer Eralda, Doukhopelnikoff Alexander, Degryse Jean-Marie

机构信息

Dept of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), Belgium.

Institute of Health and Society, Université Catholique de Louvain (UC Louvain), Belgium.

出版信息

ERJ Open Res. 2021 Apr 12;7(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00606-2020. eCollection 2021 Apr.

DOI:10.1183/23120541.00606-2020
PMID:33855062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8039901/
Abstract

Breathlessness is a common and distressing symptom in older adults and an independent predictor of adverse outcomes and yet its multidimensional assessment has not been validated in older adults. We apply and validate the Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile (MDP) in a sample of adults 75 years and older in Belgium. Breathlessness was rated with the MDP, the modified Borg Dyspnoea Scale (mBDS), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB, a numerical rating scale for intensity and unpleasantness both before and after exertion), as well as with the Medical Research Council (MRC) Dyspnoea Scale. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) assessed the affective status. Factor structure was analysed with exploratory principal components analysis, internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha and concurrent validity with Spearman's correlation coefficients with other breathlessness scales, HADS and SPPB scores. In 96 participants (mean age 85 years; 34% men) who rated breathlessness at both assessment points, exploratory principal components analysis identified two components: Immediate Perception (IP) and Emotional Reaction (ER), explaining most of the MDP item variance (65.37% before and 71.32% after exertion). Internal consistency was moderate to high for MDP-IP (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86 before and 0.89 after exertion) and MDP-ER (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89 before and 0.91 after exertion). The correlation patterns of MDP-IP and MDP-ER with other tests confirmed concurrent validity. The domain structure, reliability and concurrent validity of MDP for breathlessness before and after exertion were confirmed in a sample of adults 75 years and older, supporting its use and further research for the multidimensional profiling of breathlessness in older adults.

摘要

呼吸困难是老年人常见且令人痛苦的症状,也是不良后果的独立预测因素,然而其多维评估在老年人中尚未得到验证。我们在比利时75岁及以上的成年人样本中应用并验证了多维呼吸困难量表(MDP)。使用MDP、改良的博格呼吸困难量表(mBDS)、简短体能测试电池(SPPB,一种用于评估运动前后强度和不适程度的数字评分量表)以及医学研究委员会(MRC)呼吸困难量表对呼吸困难进行评分。医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评估情感状态。通过探索性主成分分析分析因子结构,用克朗巴赫α系数分析内部一致性,用与其他呼吸困难量表、HADS和SPPB评分的斯皮尔曼相关系数分析同时效度。在两个评估点都对呼吸困难进行评分的96名参与者(平均年龄85岁;34%为男性)中,探索性主成分分析确定了两个成分:即时感知(IP)和情绪反应(ER),解释了大部分MDP项目方差(运动前为65.37%,运动后为71.32%)。MDP-IP(运动前克朗巴赫α系数=0.86,运动后=0.89)和MDP-ER(运动前克朗巴赫α系数=0.89,运动后=0.91)的内部一致性从中度到高度。MDP-IP和MDP-ER与其他测试的相关模式证实了同时效度。在75岁及以上的成年人样本中,证实了MDP在运动前后呼吸困难方面的领域结构、可靠性和同时效度,支持其在老年人呼吸困难多维分析中的应用和进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c00/8039901/1c54a4526a1a/00606-2020.01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c00/8039901/1c54a4526a1a/00606-2020.01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c00/8039901/1c54a4526a1a/00606-2020.01.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile in older adults.老年人多维呼吸困难量表的效度与信度
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Apr 12;7(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00606-2020. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
Validation of the Swedish Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) in outpatients with cardiorespiratory disease.验证瑞典多维呼吸困难量表(MDP)在心肺疾病门诊患者中的应用。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019 Sep 18;6(1):e000381. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000381. eCollection 2019.
3
Validation of the Dyspnoea-12 and Multidimensional Dyspnea profile among older Swedish men in the population.验证呼吸困难-12 量表和多维呼吸困难量表在瑞典老年男性人群中的适用性。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 2;22(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03166-5.
4
Clinical validation of the Swedish version of Dyspnoea-12 instrument in outpatients with cardiorespiratory disease.呼吸困难 12 量表瑞典语版在伴有心肺疾病的门诊患者中的临床验证。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019 Sep 18;6(1):e000418. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000418. eCollection 2019.
5
Dyspnoea-12 and Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile: Systematic Review of Use and Properties.呼吸困难 12 项量表和多维呼吸困难量表:使用和特性的系统评价。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jan;63(1):e75-e87. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.06.023. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
6
Test-retest reliability of multidimensional dyspnea profile recall ratings in the emergency department: a prospective, longitudinal study.急诊科多维呼吸困难概况回忆评分的重测信度:一项前瞻性纵向研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2012 May 24;12:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-12-6.
7
A multidimensional assessment of dyspnoea in healthy adults during exercise.健康成年人运动中呼吸困难的多维评估。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020 Nov;120(11):2533-2545. doi: 10.1007/s00421-020-04479-2. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
8
Prevalence and severity of differing dimensions of breathlessness among elderly males in the population.人群中老年男性不同维度呼吸困难的患病率及严重程度。
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Feb 7;8(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00553-2021. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Swedish translation and linguistic validation of the multidimensional dyspnoea profile.多维呼吸困难量表的瑞典语翻译及语言验证
Eur Clin Respir J. 2016 Nov 8;3:32665. doi: 10.3402/ecrj.v3.32665. eCollection 2016.
10
The assessment of breathlessness in pulmonary arterial hypertension: reliability and validity of the Dyspnoea-12.肺动脉高压中呼吸困难的评估:12项呼吸困难量表的信度和效度
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014 Dec;13(6):506-14. doi: 10.1177/1474515113514891. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated Oxygen Administration Alleviates Dyspnea in Patients Admitted with Acute Exacerbation of COPD: A Randomized Controlled Trial.自动化给氧治疗缓解 COPD 急性加重患者呼吸困难的随机对照试验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Apr 18;18:599-614. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S397782. eCollection 2023.
2
Validation of the Dyspnoea-12 and Multidimensional Dyspnea profile among older Swedish men in the population.验证呼吸困难-12 量表和多维呼吸困难量表在瑞典老年男性人群中的适用性。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 2;22(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03166-5.
3
Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the DEG, a Three-Item Dyspnea Measure.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimal Clinically Important Differences and Feasibility of Dyspnea-12 and the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile in Cardiorespiratory Disease.呼吸困难 12 项量表和多维呼吸困难量表在心肺疾病中的最小临床重要差异和可行性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Nov;60(5):968-975.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.05.028. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
2
Validation of the Swedish Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) in outpatients with cardiorespiratory disease.验证瑞典多维呼吸困难量表(MDP)在心肺疾病门诊患者中的应用。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019 Sep 18;6(1):e000381. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000381. eCollection 2019.
3
Association of Undifferentiated Dyspnea in Late Life With Cardiovascular and Noncardiovascular Dysfunction: A Cross-sectional Analysis From the ARIC Study.
三项式呼吸困难测量指标DEG的信度、效度及反应度
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug;37(10):2541-2547. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07307-1. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
4
Breathlessness dimensions association with physical and mental quality of life: the population based VASCOL study of elderly men.呼吸困难维度与身体和精神健康相关:基于人群的老年男性 VASCOL 研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Nov;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000990.
5
How to Assess Breathlessness in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.如何评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的呼吸困难。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Jun 3;16:1581-1598. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S277523. eCollection 2021.
老年人不明原因呼吸困难与心血管和非心血管功能障碍的关系:来自 ARIC 研究的横断面分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e195321. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5321.
4
A Multidimensional Profile of Dyspnea in Hospitalized Patients.住院患者呼吸困难的多维特征。
Chest. 2019 Sep;156(3):507-517. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.04.128. Epub 2019 May 22.
5
Agreement Between Breathlessness Severity and Unpleasantness in People With Chronic Breathlessness: A Longitudinal Clinical Study.呼吸困难严重程度与慢性呼吸困难患者不适感知的一致性:一项纵向临床研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Apr;57(4):715-723.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
6
Examining the Effects of Age on Health Outcomes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Results From the Genetic Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Study and Evaluation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints Cohorts.探讨年龄对慢性阻塞性肺疾病健康结局的影响:来自慢性阻塞性肺疾病遗传流行病学研究和评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病纵向以确定预测替代终点队列的结果。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1063-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.09.028.
7
Correlates of dyspnoea and its association with adverse outcomes in a cohort of adults aged 80 and over.80 岁及以上成年人队列中呼吸困难的相关因素及其与不良结局的关系。
Age Ageing. 2017 Nov 1;46(6):994-1000. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx095.
8
Measuring dyspnoea: new multidimensional instruments to match our 21st century understanding.测量呼吸困难:符合我们21世纪认知的新型多维工具。
Eur Respir J. 2017 Mar 2;49(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02473-2016. Print 2017 Mar.
9
Comparison of the Dyspnoea-12 and Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile in people with COPD.呼吸困难 12 项量表与多维呼吸困难量表在 COPD 患者中的比较。
Eur Respir J. 2017 Mar 2;49(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00773-2016. Print 2017 Mar.
10
Dyspnea in Community-Dwelling Older Persons: A Multifactorial Geriatric Health Condition.社区居住老年人的呼吸困难:一种多因素老年健康状况。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Oct;64(10):2042-2050. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14290. Epub 2016 Aug 22.