Romutis Stephanie, Matta Bassem, Ibinson Jonathan, Hileman John, Istvanic Smiljana, Khalid Asif
VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA/The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Mar 30;14:26317745211001750. doi: 10.1177/26317745211001750. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
The safety and efficacy of colonic band ligation and auto-amputation (1) as adjunct to endoscopic mucosal resection of large laterally spreading tumors and (2) for polyps not amenable to routine polypectomy due to polyp burden or difficult location remain unknown.
An institutional review board-approved retrospective single-institution study was undertaken of patients undergoing colonic band ligation and auto-amputation from 2014 to date. Patients with indications of 'endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading tumors' and 'polyp not amenable to snare polypectomy' were included in the study. Data were collected on patient demographics, colonoscopy details (laterally spreading tumors/polyp characteristics, therapies applied, complications), pathology results, and follow-up (polyp eradication based on endoscopic appearance and biopsy results).
: Thirty-two patients (31 males, aged 68 ± 9.17 years) underwent endoscopic mucosal resection-band ligation and auto-amputation of 34 laterally spreading tumors (40 ± 10.9 mm). A median of 2 ± 1.09 bands were placed. Follow-up colonoscopy and biopsy results confirmed complete eradication in 21 laterally spreading tumors (70%). Nine (30%) laterally spreading tumors required additional endoscopic therapy to achieve complete eradication. Four (13%) patients underwent surgery for cancer, and two of them had resection specimens negative for cancer or residual adenoma. One patient suffered post-polypectomy syndrome. : Seven patients underwent band ligation and auto-amputation due to serrated polyposis syndrome (one patient) and innumerable polyps, or polyps in difficult locations (extension into diverticula: two patients; terminal ileum: two patients; appendiceal orifice: one patient; anal canal: one patient). The patient with serrated polyposis syndrome achieved dramatic decrease in polyp burden, but not eradication. Follow-up in five of the six remaining patients documented polyp eradication. The patient with serrated polyposis syndrome suffered from rectal pain and tenesmus following placement of 18 bands.
Band ligation and auto-amputation in the colon may be a safe and effective adjunct to current endoscopic mucosal resection and polypectomy methods and warrants further study.
Colonoscopy with rubber band placement to aid in complete removal of large polyps and polyps in technically challenging locationsColonoscopy is a commonly performed procedure for the early detection of colon and rectal cancer, and prevention through polyp removal.During colonoscopy, sometimes situations are encountered making polyp removal difficult. These can include the presence of larger polyps or the location of a polyp in an area that makes removal technically challenging or high risk.A particularly challenging situation arises when after extensive effort there is still polyp tissue remaining that cannot be removed using routine techniques. We are interested in exploring a technique which involves the placement of a rubber band after sucking a small area of the colon lining into a cap loaded onto the tip of the colonoscope. With time the rubber band strangulates the tissue and falls off along with captured tissue and passes out of the colon naturally.To assess the effectives of this technique we studied patients that have undergone this procedure at our GI unit. We identified 32 patients with 34 large polyps between 4cm to 6cm that we placed rubber bands on polyp tissue after we were unable to completely remove the polyp. On their follow up colonoscopy, complete polyp removal was successful in 21 polyps. We were also able to achieve complete polyp removal in 9 of the remaining large polyps after additional treatment. Four patients underwent surgery because cancer was found in analysis of polyp tissue.In 5 of 6 patients with polyps in difficult locations (e.g. partly within the lumen of the appendix), placement of a rubber band led to complete removal of polyp tissue.Two patients in our study population had mild adverse events that were managed with simple measures.We believe our results show promise for our described technique and this technique should be tested in larger studies.
结肠套扎及自截术作为(1)内镜黏膜切除术治疗大型侧向扩散肿瘤的辅助手段,以及(2)因息肉负荷或位置困难而不适用于常规息肉切除术的息肉的治疗方法,其安全性和有效性尚不清楚。
对2014年至今接受结肠套扎及自截术的患者进行了一项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性单机构研究。纳入有“内镜黏膜切除术治疗侧向扩散肿瘤”及“息肉不适用于圈套息肉切除术”指征的患者。收集患者人口统计学资料、结肠镜检查细节(侧向扩散肿瘤/息肉特征、应用的治疗方法、并发症)、病理结果及随访情况(根据内镜表现和活检结果判断息肉根除情况)。
32例患者(31例男性,年龄68±9.17岁)接受了内镜黏膜切除术-套扎及自截术,治疗34个侧向扩散肿瘤(直径40±10.9mm)。平均放置2±1.09个套扎圈。随访结肠镜检查及活检结果证实21个侧向扩散肿瘤(70%)完全根除。9个(30%)侧向扩散肿瘤需要额外的内镜治疗以实现完全根除。4例(13%)患者因癌症接受手术,其中2例切除标本癌症或残留腺瘤阴性。1例患者发生息肉切除术后综合征。7例患者因锯齿状息肉病综合征(1例患者)、息肉数量众多或位置困难(延伸至憩室:2例患者;回肠末端:2例患者;阑尾开口:1例患者;肛管:1例患者)接受套扎及自截术。锯齿状息肉病综合征患者息肉负荷显著降低,但未根除。其余6例患者中的5例随访记录显示息肉根除。锯齿状息肉病综合征患者放置了18个套扎圈后出现直肠疼痛和里急后重。
结肠套扎及自截术可能是当前内镜黏膜切除术和息肉切除术方法的一种安全有效的辅助手段,值得进一步研究。
通过放置橡皮筋辅助完全切除大型息肉及技术上具有挑战性位置的息肉的结肠镜检查结肠镜检查是一种常用于早期检测结肠癌和直肠癌以及通过切除息肉进行预防的检查。在结肠镜检查过程中,有时会遇到息肉切除困难的情况。这些情况包括存在较大的息肉或息肉位于技术上具有挑战性或高风险的区域。当经过大量努力后仍有息肉组织残留且无法使用常规技术切除时,会出现一种特别具有挑战性的情况。我们感兴趣的是探索一种技术,即在将一小片结肠黏膜吸进安装在结肠镜尖端的帽中后放置橡皮筋。随着时间推移,橡皮筋会勒紧组织,连同捕获的组织一起脱落,并自然排出结肠。为了评估该技术的有效性,我们研究了在我们胃肠病科接受该手术的患者。我们确定了32例患者,有34个4厘米至6厘米的大型息肉,在我们无法完全切除息肉后,我们在息肉组织上放置了橡皮筋。在他们的随访结肠镜检查中,21个息肉成功完全切除。在对其余大型息肉进行额外治疗后,我们也成功实现了9个息肉的完全切除。4例患者因息肉组织分析中发现癌症而接受手术。在6例息肉位置困难(如部分位于阑尾腔内)的患者中,5例放置橡皮筋后实现了息肉组织的完全切除。我们研究人群中的两位患者出现了轻度不良事件,通过简单措施进行了处理。我们相信我们的结果表明我们所描述的技术具有前景,该技术应在更大规模的研究中进行测试。