Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.
Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;68(2):457-464. doi: 10.1177/00207640211003942. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
Despite the extensive research and intense debate on coercion in psychiatry we have seen in recent years, little is still known about formally voluntarily admitted patients, who experience high levels of perceived coercion during their admission to a psychiatric hospital.
The purpose of the present research was to explore forms of treatment pressure put on patients, not only by clinicians, but also by patients' relatives, during admission to psychiatric hospitals in Italy, Poland and the United Kingdom.
Data were obtained via in-depth, semi-structured interviews with patients ( = 108) diagnosed with various mental disorders (ICD-10: F20-F49) hospitalised in psychiatric inpatient wards. Maximum variation sampling was applied to ensure the inclusion of patients with different socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. The study applied a common methodology to secure comparability and consistency across participating countries. The qualitative data from each country were transcribed verbatim, coded and subjected to theoretical thematic analysis.
The results of the analysis confirm that the legal classifications of involuntary and voluntary hospitalisation do not capture the fundamental distinctions between patients who are and are not coerced into treatment. Our findings show that the level of perceived coercion in voluntary patients ranges from 'persuasion' and 'interpersonal leverage' (categorised as treatment pressures) to 'threat', 'someone else's decisions' and 'violence' (categorised as informal coercion).
We suggest that the term 'treatment pressures' be applied to techniques for convincing patients to follow a suggested course of treatment by offering advice and support in getting professional help, as well as using emotional arguments based on the personal relationship with the patient. In turn, we propose to reserve the term 'informal coercion' to describe practices for pressuring patients into treatment by threatening them, by making them believe that they have no choice, and by taking away their power to make autonomous decisions.
尽管近年来我们在精神病学领域看到了广泛的研究和激烈的争论,但对于在精神病院住院期间经历高度感知到的强制治疗的正式自愿入院患者,我们仍然知之甚少。
本研究旨在探讨意大利、波兰和英国精神病院入院期间不仅临床医生,而且患者亲属对患者施加的治疗压力形式。
通过对 108 名被诊断患有各种精神障碍(ICD-10:F20-F49)的住院患者进行深入的半结构化访谈获得数据。采用最大变异抽样方法,以确保纳入具有不同社会人口学和临床特征的患者。该研究采用了一种通用方法,以确保参与国家之间的可比性和一致性。每个国家的定性数据均逐字转录、编码,并进行理论主题分析。
分析结果证实,非自愿和自愿住院的法律分类并没有捕捉到那些被迫接受治疗和未被迫接受治疗的患者之间的基本区别。我们的研究结果表明,自愿患者感知到的强制程度从“说服”和“人际杠杆”(归类为治疗压力)到“威胁”、“他人的决定”和“暴力”(归类为非正式强制)不等。
我们建议将“治疗压力”一词应用于说服患者遵循建议的治疗方案的技术,通过提供获得专业帮助的建议和支持,以及利用基于与患者个人关系的情感论点。相反,我们建议将“非正式强制”一词保留用于描述通过威胁患者、让他们相信自己别无选择以及剥夺他们自主决策权力来迫使患者接受治疗的做法。