J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2021 May 1;258(9):991-998. doi: 10.2460/javma.258.9.991.
To compare the rate of postoperative dehiscence on the basis of intraoperative anastomotic leak test results (ie, positive or negative for leakage or testing not performed) between dogs that underwent hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) or functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis (FEESA) of the small intestine.
131 client-owned dogs that underwent 144 small intestinal anastomoses (94 FEESA and 50 HSA).
Medical records were searched to identify dogs that had undergone a small intestinal anastomosis (HSA or FEESA) from January 2008 through October 2019. Data were collected regarding signalment, indication for surgery, location of the anastomosis, surgical technique, the presence of preoperative septic peritonitis, performance of intraoperative leak testing, development of postoperative dehiscence, and duration of follow-up.
Intraoperative leak testing was performed during 62 of 144 (43.1%) small intestinal anastomoses, which included 26 of 94 (27.7%) FEESAs and 36 of 50 (72.0%) HSAs. Thirteen of 144 (9.0%) anastomoses underwent dehiscence after surgery (median, 4 days; range, 2 to 17 days), with subsequent septic peritonitis, including 10 of 94 (10.6%) FEESAs and 3 of 50 (6.0%) HSAs. The incidence of postoperative dehiscence was not significantly different between FEESAs and HSAs; between anastomoses that underwent intraoperative leak testing and those that did not, regardless of anastomotic technique; or between anastomoses with positive and negative leak test results. Hand-sewn anastomoses were significantly more likely to undergo leak testing than FEESAs. Preoperative septic peritonitis, use of omental or serosal reinforcement, preoperative serum albumin concentration, and surgical indication were not significantly different between anastomotic techniques.
Performance of intraoperative anastomotic leak testing, regardless of the anastomotic technique, was not associated with a reduction in the incidence of postoperative anastomotic dehiscence.
比较术中吻合口漏试验(即漏或未进行测试)结果基础上的术后裂开率,比较行手工吻合(HSA)或功能性端端吻合(FEESA)的小肠的狗。
131 只接受了 144 例小肠吻合术(94 例 FEESA 和 50 例 HSA)的患犬。
搜索医疗记录,以确定 2008 年 1 月至 2019 年 10 月期间接受小肠吻合术(HSA 或 FEESA)的犬。收集有关品种、手术指征、吻合部位、手术技术、术前感染性腹膜炎的存在、术中漏试验的进行、术后裂开的发展以及随访时间的数据。
在 144 例小肠吻合术中有 62 例(43.1%)进行了术中漏试验,其中包括 94 例中的 26 例(27.7%)FEESA 和 50 例中的 36 例(72.0%)HSA。手术后有 13 例(9.0%)吻合术发生裂开(中位数,4 天;范围,2 至 17 天),随后发生感染性腹膜炎,包括 94 例中的 10 例(10.6%)FEESA 和 50 例中的 3 例(6.0%)HSA。FEESA 和 HSA 之间、接受和未接受术中漏试验的吻合术之间,以及漏试验阳性和阴性的吻合术之间,术后裂开的发生率无显著差异。HSA 比 FEESA 更有可能进行漏试验。术前感染性腹膜炎、使用网膜或浆膜加固、术前血清白蛋白浓度和手术适应证在吻合技术之间无显著差异。
无论吻合技术如何,进行术中吻合口漏试验都与降低术后吻合口裂开的发生率无关。