Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Florida, USA.
Department of Statistics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences University of Florida, Florida, USA.
Vet Surg. 2020 Oct;49(7):1315-1325. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13490. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
To compare leak pressures and construct completion time of six intestinal anastomoses and report normal canine gastrointestinal thickness.
Experimental study.
Grossly normal jejunal segments (n = 140) from 10 fresh canine cadavers.
Gastrointestinal thickness was recorded. Eight-centimeter cooled canine cadaveric jejunal segments were randomly assigned to a control group (20 segments) and six treatment groups (20 segments/group [10 constructs/group]): (1) handsewn anastomosis (HSA), (2) functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis (FEESA)-blue thoracoabdominal (TA; FEESA-TAB), (3) FEESA-green TA (FEESA-TAG), (4) FEESA TA-gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA), (5) FEESA with suture oversew (FEESA-O), and (6) skin staples (SS). Construct assembly time, initial leak pressure (ILP), maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP), and leakage location were compared.
Initial leak pressures (mean ± SD) for control (308.38 ± 115.91 mm Hg), HSA (41.96 ± 15.97), FEESA-TAB (31.71 ± 15.71), FEESA-TAG (27.24 ± 14.11), FEESA-GIA (25.62 ± 11.22), FEESA-O (31.01 ± 17.38), and SS (44.42 ± 28.88) groups were compared. No difference in ILP (P > .24) or MIP (P > .17) was detected between treatment groups. Sutured anastomoses took up to 10 times longer to complete (P = .0025). The stomach, duodenum, jejunum, and ileum mural thicknesses (mean ± SD) were 3.99 ± 0.44 mm, 2.34 ± 0.16, 2.49 ± 0.28, and 2.30 ± 0.31, respectively.
The ILP of all anastomoses exceeded maximum intraluminal peristaltic pressures. Stapled anastomoses were faster to complete.
All anastomoses may be considered when performing an intestinal resection and anastomosis, with stapled anastomoses resulting in a shorter surgical time. Canine intestinal thickness may warrant use of a larger staple size.
比较六种肠吻合术的泄漏压力和构建完成时间,并报告正常犬胃肠道的厚度。
实验研究。
来自 10 具新鲜犬尸体的大体正常空肠段(n = 140)。
记录胃肠道厚度。将 8 厘米长的冷却犬尸体空肠段随机分配至对照组(20 段)和 6 个治疗组(每组 20 段[每组 10 个构建]):(1)手工吻合术(HSA),(2)功能性端端吻合钉吻合术(FEESA)-蓝色胸腹(FEESA-TAB),(3)FEESA 绿色 TA(FEESA-TAG),(4)FEESA TA-胃肠吻合术(FEESA-GIA),(5)FEESA 带缝合过缝(FEESA-O),和(6)皮肤钉(SS)。比较构建组件时间、初始泄漏压力(ILP)、最大腔内压力(MIP)和泄漏位置。
对照组(308.38 ± 115.91 毫米汞柱)、HSA(41.96 ± 15.97)、FEESA-TAB(31.71 ± 15.71)、FEESA-TAG(27.24 ± 14.11)、FEESA-GIA(25.62 ± 11.22)、FEESA-O(31.01 ± 17.38)和 SS(44.42 ± 28.88)组的初始泄漏压力(平均值 ± 标准差)进行了比较。治疗组之间的 ILP(P>.24)或 MIP(P>.17)无差异。缝合吻合术完成时间最长可达 10 倍(P =.0025)。胃、十二指肠、空肠和回肠壁厚度(平均值 ± 标准差)分别为 3.99 ± 0.44 毫米、2.34 ± 0.16、2.49 ± 0.28 和 2.30 ± 0.31。
所有吻合术的 ILP 均超过最大腔内蠕动压力。吻合钉吻合术完成速度更快。
在进行肠切除和吻合术时,可以考虑所有吻合术,吻合钉吻合术可缩短手术时间。犬的肠道厚度可能需要使用更大的吻合钉尺寸。