• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单中心倾向性评分加权分析微创与开腹结直肠手术后化疗时间。

A Single Institution Propensity Score Weighted Analysis of Time to Chemotherapy After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Colorectal Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, 1261St Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Biostatistics and Epidemiology Methods Consulting, BEMC, LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2022 Dec;88(12):2877-2885. doi: 10.1177/00031348211011137. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1177/00031348211011137
PMID:33856932
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oncologic outcomes for colon cancer are optimal when chemotherapy is started within 6 to 8 weeks after surgery. The study objective was to investigate the impact of operative modality and urgency on the time interval from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective institutional tumor registry cohort study of open and laparoscopic/robotic colorectal resections for stage II-IV cancer between April 2010 and January 2018. Primary outcome was time from surgery to chemotherapy. Predictor variables were adjusted for imbalances by propensity score weighting.

RESULTS

A total of 220 patients met inclusion criteria: 171 elective (108 laparoscopic/robotic and 63 open) and 49 urgent colectomies. After propensity score weighting, there was no significant difference in time to chemotherapy between elective minimally invasive and open surgical approaches (48 days vs. 58 days, = .187). Only 68.9% of minimally invasive and 50.8% of open colectomy patients started chemotherapy within 8 weeks of surgery. There was a significant difference ( = .037) among surgical sites with rectal resections having the longest (55 days), and right colectomies having the shortest (46 days), time to chemotherapy. Patients who had urgent operations had significantly longer hospital length of stay ( < .001) and higher post-discharge emergency department visit rates ( < .001) than the elective operation group. However, there was no significant difference in time to chemotherapy.

DISCUSSION

Neither operative modality nor operative urgency resulted in a significant difference in postoperative time to initiating chemotherapy. Future efforts should be focused on identifying postoperative recovery criteria and optimum multidisciplinary communication methods that allow recovered patients to start chemotherapy sooner.

摘要

背景

在手术后 6 至 8 周内开始化疗时,结肠癌的肿瘤学疗效最佳。本研究旨在探讨手术方式和紧急程度对辅助化疗开始时间的影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性机构肿瘤登记队列研究,纳入了 2010 年 4 月至 2018 年 1 月期间接受 II-IV 期结肠癌开放和腹腔镜/机器人结直肠切除术的患者。主要结局为手术至化疗的时间间隔。通过倾向评分加权调整预测变量以平衡不平衡。

结果

共有 220 名患者符合纳入标准:171 例择期(108 例腹腔镜/机器人手术和 63 例开放手术)和 49 例急诊手术。在进行倾向评分加权后,择期微创和开放手术方式之间的化疗时间无显著差异(48 天 vs. 58 天, =.187)。仅有 68.9%的微创和 50.8%的开放结直肠切除术患者在手术后 8 周内开始化疗。手术部位之间存在显著差异( =.037),直肠切除术的化疗时间最长(55 天),右半结肠切除术最短(46 天)。与择期手术组相比,急诊手术患者的住院时间明显延长( <.001),出院后急诊就诊率更高( <.001),但化疗时间无显著差异。

讨论

手术方式和紧急程度均未导致术后开始化疗的时间存在显著差异。未来的研究应集中于确定术后恢复标准和最佳多学科沟通方法,以使康复患者能够更早地开始化疗。

相似文献

1
A Single Institution Propensity Score Weighted Analysis of Time to Chemotherapy After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Colorectal Surgery.单中心倾向性评分加权分析微创与开腹结直肠手术后化疗时间。
Am Surg. 2022 Dec;88(12):2877-2885. doi: 10.1177/00031348211011137. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
2
A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery.一项基于人群的比较结直肠手术中腹腔镜手术与机器人手术结果的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):455-463. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4218-6. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
3
A comparative analysis of outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic elective (procto-) colectomies for benign and malignant disease.开腹、腹腔镜和机器人择期(直肠-)结肠切除术治疗良恶性疾病的结局比较分析。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):53-62. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01069-4. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
4
The impact of operative approach on postoperative outcomes and healthcare utilization after colectomy.手术入路对结肠切除术后结局和医疗保健利用的影响。
Surgery. 2022 Feb;171(2):320-327. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
5
Optimizing outcomes in colorectal surgery: cost and clinical analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic approaches to colon resection.优化结直肠手术结果:机器人与腹腔镜结肠切除术的成本与临床分析。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):107-112. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01205-8. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
6
Operative time and length of stay is similar between robotic assisted and laparoscopic colon and rectal resections.机器人辅助与腹腔镜结肠和直肠切除术的手术时间和住院时间相似。
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):659-664. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0798-1. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
7
Frailer Patients Undergoing Robotic Colectomies for Colon Cancer Experience Increased Complication Rates Compared With Open or Laparoscopic Approaches.对于接受机器人结肠癌切除术的体弱患者而言,其并发症发生率较开放性或腹腔镜手术更高。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 May;63(5):588-597. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001598.
8
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Match Analysis.老年患者机器人手术与腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的倾向评分匹配分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Nov;28(11):1334-1345. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0115. Epub 2018 May 31.
9
Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.腹腔镜、开放和机器人手术治疗直肠癌的肿瘤学和围手术期结果:一项多中心、倾向评分加权队列研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jan;63(1):46-52. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001534.
10
Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted, left-sided colectomies: intra- and postoperative outcomes of 683 patients.腹腔镜与机器人辅助左半结肠切除术:683 例患者的围手术期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):6235-6242. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-09003-x. Epub 2022 Jan 13.