Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Sep;94(3):498-505. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.03.937. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
We previously identified a 5 methylated DNA marker (MDM) panel for the detection of nonendoscopic Barrett's esophagus (BE). In this study, we aimed to recalibrate the performance of the 5 MDM panel using a simplified assay in a training cohort, validate the panel in an independent test cohort, and explore the accuracy of an MDM panel with only 3 markers.
Participants were recruited from 3 medical centers. The sponge on a string device (EsophaCap; CapNostics, Concord, NC, USA) was swallowed and withdrawn, followed by endoscopy, in BE cases and control subjects. A 5 MDM panel was blindly assayed using a simplified assay. Random forest modeling analysis was performed, in silico cross-validated in the training set, and then locked down, before test set analysis.
The training set had 199 patients: 110 BE cases and 89 control subjects, and the test set had 89 patients: 60 BE cases and 29 control subjects. Sensitivity of the 5 MDM panel for BE diagnosis was 93% at 90% specificity in the training set and 93% at 93% specificity in the test set. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were .96 and .97 in the training and test sets, respectively. Model accuracy was not influenced by age, sex, or smoking history. Multiple 3 MDM panels achieved similar accuracy.
A 5 MDM panel for BE is highly accurate in training and test sets in a blinded multisite case-control analysis using a simplified assay. This panel may be reduced to only 3 MDMs in the future. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02560623.).
我们之前发现了一个用于检测非内镜 Barrett 食管(BE)的 5 个甲基化 DNA 标志物(MDM)标志物panel。在这项研究中,我们旨在使用简化的检测方法在训练队列中重新校准 5 MDM panel 的性能,在独立的测试队列中验证该panel,并探索仅用 3 个标志物的 MDM panel 的准确性。
参与者从 3 个医疗中心招募。在 BE 病例和对照受试者中,吞下并拔出带有字符串的海绵装置(EsophaCap;CapNostics,Concord,NC,USA),然后进行内镜检查。使用简化的检测方法对 5 MDM panel 进行盲法检测。在训练集中进行随机森林模型分析,在训练集内进行了计算机交叉验证,然后锁定,再进行测试集分析。
训练集有 199 例患者:110 例 BE 病例和 89 例对照受试者,测试集有 89 例患者:60 例 BE 病例和 29 例对照受试者。5 MDM panel 对 BE 诊断的敏感性在训练集为 90%特异性时为 93%,在测试集为 93%特异性时为 93%。训练集和测试集的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.96 和 0.97。模型准确性不受年龄、性别或吸烟史的影响。多个 3 MDM panel 达到了相似的准确性。
在一项使用简化检测方法的盲多中心病例对照分析中,用于 BE 的 5 MDM panel 在训练集和测试集的准确性都很高。该panel 未来可能会减少到仅 3 个 MDM。(临床试验注册号:NCT02560623)。