Suppr超能文献

前瞻性多中心队列中用于非内镜 Barrett 食管检测试验的算法训练和测试。

Algorithm Training and Testing for a Nonendoscopic Barrett's Esophagus Detection Test in Prospective Multicenter Cohorts.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Division of Clinical Trials, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Aug;22(8):1596-1604.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) detection is invasive and expensive. Nonendoscopic BE/EAC detection tools are guideline-endorsed alternatives. We previously described a 5-methylated DNA marker (MDM) panel assayed on encapsulated sponge cell collection device (CCD) specimens. We aimed to train a new algorithm using a 3-MDM panel and test its performance in an independent cohort.

METHODS

Algorithm training and test samples were from 2 prospective multicenter cohorts. All BE cases had esophageal intestinal metaplasia (with or without dysplasia/EAC); control subjects had no endoscopic evidence of BE. The CCD procedure was followed by endoscopy. From CCD cell lysates, DNA was extracted, bisulfite treated, and MDMs were blindly assayed. The algorithm was set and locked using cross-validated logistic regression (training set) and its performance was assessed in an independent test set.

RESULTS

Training (N = 352) and test (N = 125) set clinical characteristics were comparable. The final panel included 3 MDMs (NDRG4, VAV3, ZNF682). Overall sensitivity was 82% (95% CI, 68%-94%) at 90% (79%-98%) specificity and 88% (78%-94%) sensitivity at 84% (70%-93%) specificity in training and test sets, respectively. Sensitivity was 90% and 68% for all long- and short-segment BE, respectively. Sensitivity for BE with high-grade dysplasia and EAC was 100% in training and test sets. Overall sensitivity for nondysplastic BE was 82%. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for BE detection were 0.92 and 0.94 in the training and test sets, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A locked 3-MDM panel algorithm for BE/EAC detection using a nonendoscopic CCD demonstrated excellent sensitivity for high-risk BE cases in independent validation samples. (Clinical trials.gov: NCT02560623, NCT03060642.).

摘要

背景与目的

内镜下 Barrett 食管(BE)和食管腺癌(EAC)的检测具有侵袭性且费用昂贵。非内镜 BE/EAC 检测工具是指南推荐的替代方法。我们之前描述了一种在封装海绵细胞采集装置(CCD)标本上检测的 5-甲基化 DNA 标记(MDM)标志物。我们旨在使用 3-MDM 标志物训练一个新的算法,并在独立队列中测试其性能。

方法

算法训练和测试样本来自 2 项前瞻性多中心队列研究。所有 BE 病例均有食管肠上皮化生(伴或不伴异型增生/EAC);对照组无内镜 BE 证据。CCD 后行内镜检查。从 CCD 细胞裂解物中提取、亚硫酸氢盐处理 DNA,盲法检测 MDMs。使用交叉验证逻辑回归(训练集)设置和锁定算法,并在独立测试集中评估其性能。

结果

训练集(N=352)和测试集(N=125)的临床特征相似。最终的标志物面板包括 3 个 MDMs(NDRG4、VAV3、ZNF682)。在训练集和测试集中,总体敏感性分别为 82%(95%CI,68%-94%),特异性为 90%(79%-98%),敏感性为 88%(78%-94%),特异性为 84%(70%-93%)。所有长段和短段 BE 的敏感性分别为 90%和 68%。训练集和测试集中,高级别异型增生和 EAC 的 BE 敏感性均为 100%。非异型增生 BE 的总体敏感性为 82%。BE 检测的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.92 和 0.94。

结论

使用非内镜 CCD 的 BE/EAC 检测的锁定 3-MDM 标志物面板算法在独立验证样本中对高危 BE 病例具有出色的敏感性。(临床试验.gov:NCT02560623,NCT03060642。)

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验