Department of Clinical Laboratory.
Department of Hematology, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2021 Jul 1;32(5):312-316. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000001037.
The number of patients with diabetes with a risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) is increasing worldwide, leading to a higher demand for evaluating atherosclerosis. Recently, the mean platelet volume (MPV) available from complete blood count is gaining attention as a marker of underlying atherosclerotic lesions. In the current study, we examined whether MPV can predict carotid atherosclerosis in patients with diabetes at an intermediate or high risk for CVD. A total of 224 patients with diabetes aged 36-85 years who underwent carotid ultrasound examination were assessed. The risk of CVD was evaluated using the Suita score. The greatest carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in each common carotid artery (CCA Max-IMT), carotid bulb, internal carotid artery, or external carotid artery (Total Max-IMT) was measured. Subsequently, the relationship between MPV and IMT was analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to their MPV values (<9.5 fl, tertile 1; 9.5-10.2 fl, tertile 2; and >10.2 fl, tertile 3). A correlation was observed between MPV and platelet count (P < 0.001), platelet distribution width (P < 0.001), and glycated hemoglobin (P = 0.04); however, multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated no relationship between MPV and CCA Max-IMT [odds ratio, 0.89 (0.60-1.29), P = 0.54] or Total Max-IMT [odds ratio, 0.87 (0.61-1.24), P = 0.45]. MPV did not correlate with carotid artery thickness. Therefore, it is difficult to determine the significance of MPV in atherosclerotic conditions from this study.
全球范围内,患有心血管疾病(CVD)风险的糖尿病患者数量不断增加,这导致对动脉粥样硬化评估的需求增加。最近,全血细胞计数中的平均血小板体积(MPV)作为潜在动脉粥样硬化病变的标志物受到关注。在目前的研究中,我们研究了在 CVD 中危或高危的糖尿病患者中,MPV 是否可以预测颈动脉粥样硬化。共评估了 224 名年龄在 36-85 岁之间、接受颈动脉超声检查的糖尿病患者。使用 Suita 评分评估 CVD 风险。测量每个颈总动脉(CCA Max-IMT)、颈动脉窦、颈内动脉或颈外动脉(总 Max-IMT)的最大颈动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT)。随后,分析了 MPV 与 IMT 之间的关系。根据患者的 MPV 值(<9.5 fl,第 1 三分位数;9.5-10.2 fl,第 2 三分位数;>10.2 fl,第 3 三分位数)将患者分为三组。MPV 与血小板计数(P < 0.001)、血小板分布宽度(P < 0.001)和糖化血红蛋白(P = 0.04)呈正相关;然而,多变量逻辑回归分析表明 MPV 与 CCA Max-IMT 之间无相关性[比值比,0.89(0.60-1.29),P = 0.54]或总 Max-IMT[比值比,0.87(0.61-1.24),P=0.45]。MPV 与颈动脉厚度无关。因此,从这项研究中很难确定 MPV 在动脉粥样硬化情况下的意义。