Suppr超能文献

烟草与健康人群评估研究的纵向应用。

Longitudinal Uses of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study.

作者信息

Piesse Andrea, Opsomer Jean, Dohrmann Sylvia, DiGaetano Ralph, Morganstein David, Taylor Kristie, Carusi Charles, Hyland Andrew

机构信息

Statistics and Evaluation Sciences, Westat, Rockville, MD, United States.

Behavioral Health and Health Policy, Westat, Rockville, MD, United States.

出版信息

Tob Regul Sci. 2021 Jan;7(1):3-16. doi: 10.18001/trs.7.1.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study is a nationally representative study of the US population on tobacco use and its effects on health, with 3 waves of data collection between 2013 and 2016. Prior work described the methods of the first wave. In this paper, we describe the methods of the subsequent 2 waves and provide recommendations for how to conduct longitudinal analyses of PATH Study data.

METHODS

We use standard survey quality metrics to evaluate the results of the follow-up waves of the PATH Study. The recommendations and examples of longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses of PATH Study data follow a design-based statistical inference framework.

RESULTS

The quality metrics indicate that the PATH Study sample of approximately 40,000 continuing respondents remains representative of its target population. Depending on the intended analysis, different survey weights may be appropriate.

CONCLUSION

The PATH Study data are a valuable resource for regulatory scientists interested in longitudinal analysis of tobacco use and its effects on health. The availability of multiple sets of specialized survey weights enables researchers to target a wide range of tobacco-related analytic questions.

摘要

目标

烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究是一项针对美国人口烟草使用情况及其对健康影响的具有全国代表性的研究,在2013年至2016年期间进行了三轮数据收集。之前的工作描述了第一轮的方法。在本文中,我们描述了后续两轮的方法,并就如何对PATH研究数据进行纵向分析提供建议。

方法

我们使用标准的调查质量指标来评估PATH研究后续轮次的结果。PATH研究数据纵向和横断面分析的建议及示例遵循基于设计的统计推断框架。

结果

质量指标表明,约40000名持续受访者的PATH研究样本仍能代表其目标人群。根据预期分析,不同的调查权重可能是合适的。

结论

PATH研究数据对于有兴趣对烟草使用及其对健康影响进行纵向分析的监管科学家来说是一种宝贵资源。多套专门调查权重的可用性使研究人员能够针对广泛的烟草相关分析问题。

相似文献

1
Longitudinal Uses of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study.
Tob Regul Sci. 2021 Jan;7(1):3-16. doi: 10.18001/trs.7.1.1.
2
Update to the design and methods of the PATH Study, Wave 4 (2016-2017).
Tob Control. 2024 Oct 19;33(6):733-738. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057851.
7
Design and methods of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.
Tob Control. 2017 Jul;26(4):371-378. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052934. Epub 2016 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Cigarette Smoking During Recovery From Substance Use Disorders.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.1976.
3
Policy influences on adolescent risk perceptions of vaping.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1136/jech-2025-224027.
5
Tobacco and E-Product Use by US Adults With Disabilities.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2460471. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60471.
7
Tobacco Use, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems, and Vulnerable Populations: Current Landscape and Opportunities for Improvement.
JACC Adv. 2024 Nov 27;3(11):101362. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101362. eCollection 2024 Nov.
9
Flavor and Device Choices Among People Who Use ENDS: Results From the PATH Study.
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Feb;68(2):236-244. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.020. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Design and methods of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.
Tob Control. 2017 Jul;26(4):371-378. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052934. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
2
Cohort studies: prospective versus retrospective.
Nephron Clin Pract. 2009;113(3):c214-7. doi: 10.1159/000235241. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
3
Evaluating the evidence: is there a rigid hierarchy?
Circulation. 2008 Oct 14;118(16):1675-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.721357.
4
Attrition in longitudinal studies: who do you lose?
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2006 Aug;30(4):353-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2006.tb00849.x.
5
Survey nonresponse bias among young adults: the role of alcohol, tobacco, and drugs.
Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40(2):171-85. doi: 10.1081/ja-200048447.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验