Moir Elwyn, Yang Jamie O, Yao Jimmy, Weinlander Eva
Certified Medical Scribe, Stanford Family Medicine.
David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
PRiMER. 2021 Feb 1;5:4. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2021.548093. eCollection 2021.
Care of patients with chronic medical and mental health conditions can be a source of frustration for primary care clinicians and may present a challenge in modeling effective interventions for medical learners. Mind-body medicine (MBM) interventions have shown success for a variety of conditions, and training in MBM has been associated with decreased burnout and improved professional satisfaction.8 We piloted MBM collaborative visits led by faculty physicians and facilitated by medical learners. We then assessed their efficacy treating patients with complex needs.
We conducted a series of eight weekly 2.5-hour MBM interventions for groups of five to eight participants (52 in total) with chronic health conditions. Matched-pair hypothesis tests analyzed nine health indicators measured pre- and postintervention: the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) as well as participants' perceived mental and physical health, stress and stress coping, agency, and capacity to connect with others. We made conservative calculations of effect size using Hedges' .
Participants showed significant, large improvements in their PHQ-9 scores ( <.005, =0.807), and moderate improvements in ability to cope with stress (<.005, =0.502), sense of control over their diagnoses (<.05, =0.413), and perceived overall mental health (<.05, =0.424). Other outcomes were nonsignificant, including a small improvement in participants' perceived overall health ( =.071, =0.286).
Patients completing the intervention enjoyed largely improved outcomes despite unchanged stress at work and home. Physician-led MBM collaborative visits comprise a feasible, reproducible, and reimbursable treatment option for improving patient care. They also immerse medical learners in an evidence-based practice model supportive of professional satisfaction.
患有慢性疾病和精神健康问题的患者护理工作可能会让初级保健临床医生感到沮丧,并且在为医学学习者建立有效干预模式方面可能构成挑战。身心医学(MBM)干预已在多种病症中取得成功,而MBM培训与职业倦怠减轻和职业满意度提高相关。我们试点了由教师医生主导、医学学习者协助的MBM协作诊疗。然后,我们评估了其治疗有复杂需求患者的疗效。
我们为患有慢性健康问题的五至八名参与者(共52人)组成的小组进行了一系列为期八周、每周2.5小时的MBM干预。配对假设检验分析了干预前后测量的九个健康指标:患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)以及参与者感知的心理和身体健康、压力与压力应对、能动性以及与他人建立联系的能力。我们使用赫奇斯系数对效应大小进行了保守计算。
参与者的PHQ-9得分有显著大幅改善(<.005,=0.807),应对压力的能力有中度改善(<.005,=0.502),对自身诊断的控制感有中度改善(<.05,=0.413),以及感知的总体心理健康有中度改善(<.05,=0.424)。其他结果不显著,包括参与者感知的总体健康有小幅改善(=.071,=0.286)。
尽管工作和家庭压力未变,但完成干预的患者的结局有很大改善。由医生主导的MBM协作诊疗是一种可行、可重复且可报销的改善患者护理的治疗选择。它们还让医学学习者沉浸在支持职业满意度的循证实践模式中。