• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Fewer patients receive recommendations for pharmacotherapy in primary prevention using the 2018 atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk estimator.使用 2018 年动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险评估器,接受药物治疗建议进行一级预防的患者较少。
Prev Med. 2021 Jul;148:106555. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106555. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Estimates Using the Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events Equations.使用预测心血管疾病事件方程评估动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Aug 1;184(8):963-970. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1302.
3
Statin Eligibility for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease According to 2021 European Prevention Guidelines Compared With Other International Guidelines.根据 2021 年欧洲预防指南与其他国际指南相比,他汀类药物用于心血管疾病一级预防的适宜性。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Aug 1;7(8):836-843. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.1876.
4
Primary Prevention With Statins: ACC/AHA Risk-Based Approach Versus Trial-Based Approaches to Guide Statin Therapy.采用他汀类药物进行一级预防:ACC/AHA 基于风险的方法与基于试验的方法指导他汀类药物治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 22;66(24):2699-2709. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.089.
5
ACC/AHA guidelines superior to ESC/EAS guidelines for primary prevention with statins in non-diabetic Europeans: the Copenhagen General Population Study.在非糖尿病欧洲人中,美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)关于他汀类药物一级预防的指南优于欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲动脉粥样硬化学会(ESC/EAS)指南:哥本哈根普通人群研究。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Feb 21;38(8):586-594. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw426.
6
Performance of the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Cardiovascular Risk Equations in Clinical Practice.ACC/AHA 队列心血管风险方程在临床实践中的表现。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Oct 10;82(15):1499-1508. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.07.018.
7
Retrospective examination of lipid-lowering treatment patterns in a real-world high-risk cohort in the UK in 2014: comparison with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2014 lipid modification guidelines.2014年英国一个真实世界高风险队列中降脂治疗模式的回顾性研究:与英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)2014年血脂修饰指南的比较。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 17;7(2):e013255. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013255.
8
Coronary Artery Calcium Versus Pooled Cohort Equations Score for Primary Prevention Guidance: Randomized Feasibility Trial.冠状动脉钙化与用于一级预防指导的合并队列方程评分:随机可行性试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 May;15(5):843-855. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
9
Impact of Replacing the Pooled Cohort Equation With Other Cardiovascular Disease Risk Scores on Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment (from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis [MESA]).用其他心血管疾病风险评分取代合并队列方程对动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险评估的影响(来自动脉粥样硬化多民族研究 [MESA])
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;118(5):691-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
10
Antihyperlipidemic Medication Treatment Patterns and Statin Adherence Among Patients with ASCVD in a Managed Care Plan After Release of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol.在 2013 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会发布的《关于治疗血液胆固醇的指南》发布后,在管理式医疗计划中,患有 ASCVD 的患者的降脂药物治疗模式和他汀类药物的依从性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Aug;22(8):892-900. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.8.892.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative performance of the two pooled cohort equations for predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.两种列线图方程预测动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的比较性能。
Atherosclerosis. 2021 Oct;334:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.08.034. Epub 2021 Aug 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Do Risk-Enhancing Factors Enhance Risk Estimation?风险增强因素会提高风险评估吗?
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Nov;12(11):e006078. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006078. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
2
Effects of Race on Statin Prescribing for Primary Prevention With High Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in a Large Healthcare System.种族对大型医疗体系中具有高动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险的患者进行他汀类药物一级预防的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 19;8(22):e014709. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014709. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
3
Potential Cardiovascular Disease Events Prevented with Adoption of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline.采用 2017 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会血压指南可预防潜在的心血管疾病事件。
Circulation. 2019 Jan 2;139(1):24-36. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035640.
4
Use of Risk Assessment Tools to Guide Decision-Making in the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Special Report From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology.使用风险评估工具指导动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病一级预防决策:美国心脏协会和美国心脏病学会的特别报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 25;73(24):3153-3167. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
5
2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2018年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心血管和肺康复协会/美国医师助理学会/美国心脏协会/美国预防医学学会/美国糖尿病协会/美国老年医学会/美国药剂师协会/美国临床内分泌医师协会/美国国家脂质协会/美国初级保健医师学会血胆固醇管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 25;73(24):3168-3209. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
6
Clinical Implications of Revised Pooled Cohort Equations for Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk.修订后的汇总队列方程在估计动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险中的临床意义。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jul 3;169(1):20-29. doi: 10.7326/M17-3011. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
7
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师协会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年病学会/美国药剂师协会/美国血液学会/美国预防医学学会/美国医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):e13-e115. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
8
Coronary Artery Calcification.冠状动脉钙化
Glob Heart. 2016 Sep;11(3):287-293. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2016.08.001.
9
Accuracy of the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk Equation in a Large Contemporary, Multiethnic Population.当代大型多民族人群中动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险方程的准确性
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 10;67(18):2118-2130. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.055.
10
Diagnostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Cardiovascular Disease in African Americans: The Jackson Heart Study.非裔美国人冠状动脉钙化评分对心血管疾病的诊断价值:杰克逊心脏研究
Br J Med Med Res. 2016;11(2). doi: 10.9734/BJMMR/2016/21449. Epub 2015 Sep 21.

使用 2018 年动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险评估器,接受药物治疗建议进行一级预防的患者较少。

Fewer patients receive recommendations for pharmacotherapy in primary prevention using the 2018 atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk estimator.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2021 Jul;148:106555. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106555. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106555
PMID:33862035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8573994/
Abstract

Shortly after the introduction of the 2013 original Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE), an overestimation of risk was suggested. As such, the updated 2018 PCE was developed to more accurately assess atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in the population. Hence, this study aims to compare drug prescribing recommendations in a large, real-world patient population, depending on which PCE is used to estimate 10-year ASCVD risk. This retrospective cohort study identified 20,843 patients aged between 40 and 75 years with no previous ASCVD. The 10-year ASCVD risk score was assessed by using both PCE. Patients were assigned to the four risk categories according to the 2018 ACC/AHA guideline. The percentage of patients qualifying for guideline-recommended primary prevention with statins and/or anti-hypertensives were compared between both PCE. Risk reclassification occurred in 26.7% of patients overall (n = 5571), of which 98.1% (n = 5466) were assigned to lower risk categories with the updated PCE. Non-diabetic (14.0%) patients no longer met the threshold for recommending statins as primary prevention with the updated PCE. Likewise, 13.8% of patients with stage I hypertension no longer met the threshold for recommending antihypertensive drugs with the updated PCE. In conclusion, risk reclassification occurred among 26.7% of patients overall, mostly due to lower risk categories assigned by the updated PCE. Up to 14.0% of patients no longer met the threshold for recommending statin therapy and/or antihypertensive drugs by using the updated PCE. These findings suggest that using the updated PCE could translate into fewer patients receiving pharmacotherapy for ASCVD primary prevention.

摘要

在 2013 年原始的 Pooled Cohort Equation(PCE)推出后不久,有人提出该方程存在风险高估的问题。因此,开发了更新的 2018 年 PCE,以更准确地评估人群中的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险。因此,本研究旨在比较使用哪种 PCE 来估计 10 年 ASCVD 风险,从而比较在大型真实患者人群中药物处方建议。这项回顾性队列研究确定了 20843 名年龄在 40 至 75 岁之间、无 ASCVD 既往史的患者。使用 PCE 评估了 10 年 ASCVD 风险评分。根据 2018 年 ACC/AHA 指南,患者被分为四个风险类别。比较了两种 PCE 之间符合指南建议的他汀类药物和/或抗高血压药物一级预防的患者比例。总的来说,有 26.7%的患者(n=5571)发生了风险再分类,其中 98.1%(n=5466)在更新后的 PCE 中被分配到较低的风险类别。非糖尿病(14.0%)患者不再符合使用更新后的 PCE 作为一级预防推荐他汀类药物的标准。同样,13.8%的 I 期高血压患者不再符合使用更新后的 PCE 推荐抗高血压药物的标准。总之,总的来说,有 26.7%的患者发生了风险再分类,主要是由于更新后的 PCE 分配了较低的风险类别。高达 14.0%的患者不再符合使用更新后的 PCE 推荐他汀类药物治疗和/或抗高血压药物的标准。这些发现表明,使用更新后的 PCE 可能会导致接受 ASCVD 一级预防药物治疗的患者减少。