Mrs. Hulsbosch, Dr. De Meyer, and Prof. Drs. Beckers, Danckaerts, and Van der Oord are with KU Leuven, Belgium.
Mrs. Hulsbosch, Dr. De Meyer, and Prof. Drs. Beckers, Danckaerts, and Van der Oord are with KU Leuven, Belgium; Dr. De Meyer is also with the HELP University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;60(11):1367-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.03.009. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
Although instrumental learning deficits are, among other deficits, assumed to contribute to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), no comprehensive systematic review of instrumental learning deficits in ADHD exists. This review examines differences between ADHD and typically developing (TD) children in basic instrumental learning and the effects of reinforcement form, magnitude, schedule, and complexity, as well as effects of medication, on instrumental learning in children with ADHD.
A systematic search of PubMed, PsyINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE+EMBASE CLASSIC, ERIC, and Web of Science was conducted for articles up to March 16, 2020. Experimental studies comparing instrumental learning between groups (ADHD versus TD) or a manipulation of reinforcement/medication within an ADHD sample were included. Quality of studies was assessed with an adapted version of the Hombrados and Waddington criteria to assess risk of bias in (quasi-) experimental studies.
A total of 19 studies from among 3,384 non-duplicate screened articles were included. No difference in basic instrumental learning was found between children with ADHD and TD children, nor effects of form or magnitude of reinforcement. Results regarding reinforcement schedule and reversal learning were mixed, but children with ADHD seemed to show deficits in conditional discrimination learning compared to TD children. Methylphenidate improved instrumental learning in children with ADHD. Quality assessment showed poor quality of studies with respect to sample sizes and outcome and missing data reporting.
The review identified very few and highly heterogenous studies, with inconsistent findings. No clear deficit was found in instrumental learning under laboratory conditions. Children with ADHD do show deficits in complex forms of learning, that is, conditional discrimination learning. Clearly more research is needed, using more similar task designs and manipulations.
尽管仪器学习缺陷(among other deficits)被认为是导致注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的原因之一,但目前尚无关于 ADHD 患者仪器学习缺陷的综合系统评价。本综述考察了 ADHD 儿童与典型发育(TD)儿童在基本仪器学习方面的差异,以及强化形式、大小、日程和复杂性的影响,以及药物对 ADHD 儿童仪器学习的影响。
系统检索了 PubMed、PsyINFO、CINAHL、EMBASE+EMBASE CLASSIC、ERIC 和 Web of Science,检索时间截至 2020 年 3 月 16 日。纳入了比较两组(ADHD 与 TD)之间仪器学习差异或在 ADHD 样本中对强化/药物进行操作的实验研究。采用改良的 Hombrados 和 Waddington 标准评估研究质量,以评估(准)实验研究的偏倚风险。
从 3384 篇非重复筛选文章中,共纳入 19 项研究。ADHD 儿童与 TD 儿童在基本仪器学习方面无差异,强化形式或大小也无差异。关于强化日程和反转学习的结果存在差异,但与 TD 儿童相比,ADHD 儿童似乎在条件辨别学习方面存在缺陷。哌醋甲酯改善了 ADHD 儿童的仪器学习。质量评估显示,研究样本量、结果和缺失数据报告方面的质量较差。
本综述仅发现了极少数且高度异质的研究,且结果不一致。在实验室条件下,未发现仪器学习存在明显缺陷。ADHD 儿童确实在复杂形式的学习(即条件辨别学习)中存在缺陷。显然需要进行更多的研究,使用更相似的任务设计和操作。