• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

豆科植物下影响土壤酸化的因素。III. 硝酸盐供应对固氮豆科植物产酸的影响。

Factors affecting soil acidification under legumes. III. Acid production by N -fixing legumes as influenced by nitrate supply.

作者信息

Tang C, Unkovich M J, Bowden J W

机构信息

1 Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6907, Australia.

出版信息

New Phytol. 1999 Sep;143(3):513-521. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00475.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00475.x
PMID:33862886
Abstract

Leaching of nitrate through soil profiles is a major cause of soil acidification. Legume species differ in their ability to take up nitrate (NO ) and in the degree to which soil NO impairs legume nodulation and N fixation. This pot experiment examined species variation in N fixation and acid production in grain legumes grown for 6 wk on a sandy soil with Ca(NO ) added at 0-56.7 mg N kg soil. The eight legumes studied were Lupinus angustifolius ('Gungurru'), Lupinus albus ('Kiev mutant'), Lupinus luteus ('Teo'), Cicer arietinum (Selection T1587), Pisum sativum ('Dundale' and 'Wirrega'), Vicia faba ('Fiord') and Lathyrus sativus (Selection 453). While number of nodules was not significantly affected by treatment with NO , increasing supply of NO decreased nodule mass, with P. sativum'Wirrega' being most sensitive and C. arientinum and V. faba least sensitive. The concentrations of nitrogen in plants generally decreased as the supply of NO increased. Increasing supply of NO decreased the percentage of N fixation, most significantly in L. sativus and least in L. albus. In the absence of added NO , the amounts of H produced per unit biomass (specific acid production) differed by as much as 2.2-fold among the species, with C. arientinum generating most H , followed by L. angustifolius, L. luteus, L. albus, V. faba, L. sativus, P. sativum'Dundale' and P. sativum'Wirrega'. This species variation was even greater at higher NO supply. In the presence of NO at up to 14.2 mg N kg , acid production by these legumes correlated well with uptake of excess cations but not with the concentration of nitrogen in plants. For all species, release of H declined with increasing supply of NO , decreasing most in L. sativus and least in C. arientinum. The results suggest that there might be scope for selecting grain legume species in order to minimize soil acidification by decreasing leaching of NO .

摘要

硝酸盐通过土壤剖面淋溶是土壤酸化的主要原因。豆科植物在吸收硝酸盐(NO )的能力以及土壤中的NO 对豆科植物结瘤和固氮的损害程度方面存在差异。本盆栽试验研究了在添加了0 - 56.7 mg N/kg土壤的Ca(NO )的沙质土壤上种植6周的籽粒豆科植物在固氮和产酸方面的物种差异。所研究的8种豆科植物分别是窄叶羽扇豆(‘Gungurru’)、白羽扇豆(‘Kiev突变体’)、黄羽扇豆(‘Teo’)、鹰嘴豆(选择系T1587)、豌豆(‘Dundale’和‘Wirrega’)、蚕豆(‘Fiord’)和草豌豆(选择系453)。虽然根瘤数量不受NO 处理的显著影响,但随着NO 供应增加,根瘤质量下降,其中豌豆‘Wirrega’最敏感,鹰嘴豆和蚕豆最不敏感。植物中的氮浓度一般随着NO 供应增加而降低。随着NO 供应增加,固氮百分比下降,在草豌豆中下降最显著,在白羽扇豆中下降最少。在不添加NO 的情况下,单位生物量产生的H量(比产酸量)在不同物种间相差高达2.2倍,其中鹰嘴豆产生的H最多,其次是窄叶羽扇豆、黄羽扇豆、白羽扇豆、蚕豆、草豌豆、豌豆‘Dundale’和豌豆‘Wirrega’。在较高的NO 供应水平下,这种物种差异更大。在高达14.2 mg N/kg的NO 存在下,这些豆科植物的产酸与过量阳离子的吸收密切相关,但与植物中的氮浓度无关。对于所有物种,H的释放随着NO 供应增加而下降,在草豌豆中下降最多,在鹰嘴豆中下降最少。结果表明,有可能通过选择籽粒豆科植物物种来减少NO 的淋溶,从而将土壤酸化降至最低。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting soil acidification under legumes. III. Acid production by N -fixing legumes as influenced by nitrate supply.豆科植物下影响土壤酸化的因素。III. 硝酸盐供应对固氮豆科植物产酸的影响。
New Phytol. 1999 Sep;143(3):513-521. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00475.x.
2
Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) reduces the inhibitory effect of soil nitrate on N2 fixation of Pisum sativum.开放式空气二氧化碳浓度增高(FACE)降低了土壤硝酸盐对豌豆固氮作用的抑制效应。
Ann Bot. 2016 Jan;117(1):177-85. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv140. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
3
N Fixation, N Transfer, and Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) in Grain Legume-Wheat Intercropping: Impact of N Supply and Plant Density.豆科粮食作物-小麦间作体系中的氮素固定、氮素转移及土地当量比(LER):氮素供应与种植密度的影响
Plants (Basel). 2024 Mar 30;13(7):991. doi: 10.3390/plants13070991.
4
Biomass and nitrogen fixation dataset of L. and L. cultivated under elevated CO and nitrogen addition.在高浓度二氧化碳和添加氮条件下培养的L.和L.的生物量及固氮数据集。
Data Brief. 2024 Jun 17;55:110644. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110644. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Nitrate uptake, nitrate reductase distribution and their relation to proton release in five nodulated grain legumes.五种结瘤豆科谷物中硝酸盐的吸收、硝酸还原酶的分布及其与质子释放的关系。
Ann Bot. 2002 Sep;90(3):315-23. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf190.
6
Soil Nitrate Nitrogen Content and Grain Yields of Organically Grown Cereals as Affected by a Strip Tillage and Forage Legume Intercropping.条耕与饲用豆科植物间作对有机种植谷物土壤硝态氮含量及谷物产量的影响
Plants (Basel). 2021 Jul 15;10(7):1453. doi: 10.3390/plants10071453.
7
Nitrate inhibition of N fixation and its effect on micronutrient accumulation in shoots of soybean ( L. Merr.), Bambara groundnut ( L. Vedc) and Kersting's groundnut ().硝酸盐对大豆(L. Merr.)、 Bambara 花生(L. Vedc)和 Kersting 花生()固氮作用的抑制及其对地上部微量营养素积累的影响。
Symbiosis. 2018;75(3):205-216. doi: 10.1007/s13199-017-0531-2. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
8
Effect of winter cover crops on soil nitrogen availability, corn yield, and nitrate leaching.冬季覆盖作物对土壤氮素有效性、玉米产量和硝酸盐淋失的影响。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2001 Oct 25;1 Suppl 2:22-9. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2001.267.
9
Effect of substrate properties and phosphorus supply on facilitating the uptake of rare earth elements (REE) in mixed culture cropping systems of Hordeum vulgare, Lupinus albus and Lupinus angustifolius.底物特性和磷供应对促进大麦、白 Lupinus 和窄叶 Lupinus 混合栽培系统中稀土元素 (REE) 吸收的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(38):57172-57189. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19775-x. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
10
Response of purely symbiotic and NO3-fed nodulated plants of Lupinus luteus and Vicia atropurpurea to ultraviolet-B radiation.羽扇豆和紫花野豌豆的纯共生及供应硝酸盐结瘤植株对紫外线B辐射的响应
J Exp Bot. 2003 Jul;54(388):1771-84. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg190.

引用本文的文献

1
From pollution to reforestation: the hidden microbiome of Alnus glutinosa nodules over 30 years.从污染到重新造林:30 年来桤木根瘤的隐藏微生物群落
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23373. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07006-5.
2
Actinorhizal plants and Frankiaceae: The overlooked future of phytoremediation.放线植物和棒形科植物:被忽视的植物修复未来。
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2024 Dec;16(6):e70033. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.70033.
3
Dynamic changes of rhizosphere soil bacterial community and nutrients in cadmium polluted soils with soybean-corn intercropping.
大豆-玉米间作修复镉污染土壤过程中根际土壤细菌群落及养分的动态变化。
BMC Microbiol. 2022 Feb 15;22(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02468-3.
4
Consecutive soybean (Glycine max) planting and covering improve acidified tea garden soil.连作大豆(Glycine max)种植和覆盖可改善酸化茶园土壤。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 13;16(7):e0254502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254502. eCollection 2021.
5
Legume-microbiome interactions unlock mineral nutrients in regrowing tropical forests.豆科植物-微生物相互作用在热带森林的再生中释放矿物营养。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 16;118(11). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2022241118. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
6
The impact of a native hemiparasite on a major invasive shrub is affected by host size at time of infection.本地半寄生植物对一种主要入侵灌木的影响受感染时宿主大小的影响。
J Exp Bot. 2020 Jun 22;71(12):3725-3734. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa140.
7
Differences for traits associated with early N acquisition in a grain legume and early complementarity in grain legume-triticale mixtures.豆科谷物中与早期氮素吸收相关的性状差异以及豆科谷物-小黑麦混合物中的早期互补性。
AoB Plants. 2018 Jan 4;10(1):ply001. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/ply001. eCollection 2018 Feb.
8
The role of rhizosphere pH in regulating the rhizosphere priming effect and implications for the availability of soil-derived nitrogen to plants.根际 pH 在调节根际激发效应中的作用及其对土壤氮素有效性的影响。
Ann Bot. 2018 Jan 25;121(1):143-151. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx138.
9
The roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in phytoremediation and tree-herb interactions in Pb contaminated soil.丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)在铅污染土壤中的植物修复及乔灌相互作用中的作用
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 4;6:20469. doi: 10.1038/srep20469.
10
Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) reduces the inhibitory effect of soil nitrate on N2 fixation of Pisum sativum.开放式空气二氧化碳浓度增高(FACE)降低了土壤硝酸盐对豌豆固氮作用的抑制效应。
Ann Bot. 2016 Jan;117(1):177-85. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv140. Epub 2015 Sep 7.