Guo L D, Hyde K D, Liew E C Y
1 Centre for Research in Fungal Diversity, Department of Ecology and Biodiversity, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong.
New Phytol. 2000 Sep;147(3):617-630. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00716.x.
A survey of the endophytic fungi in fronds of Livistona chinensis was carried out in Hong Kong. The endophyte assemblages identified using morphological characters consisted of 16 named species and 19 'morphospecies', the latter grouped based on cultural morphology and growth rates. Arrangement of taxa into morphospecies does not reflect species phylogeny, and therefore selected morphospecies were further identified based on ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequence analysis. The 5.8S gene and flanking internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) regions of rDNA from 19 representative morphospecies were amplified by the polymerase chain reaction and sequenced. Phylogenetic analysis based on 5.8S gene sequences showed that these morphospecies were filamentous Ascomycota, belonging in the Loculoascomycetes and Pyrenomycetes. Further identification was conducted by means of sequence comparison and phylogenetic analysis of both the ITS and 5.8S regions. Results showed that MS704 belonged to the genus Diaporthe and its anamorph Phomopsis of the Valsaceae. MS594 was inferred to be Mycosphaerella and its anamorph Cladosporium of the Mycosphaerellaceae. MS339, MS366, MS370, MS395, MS1033, MS1083 and MS1092 were placed in the genus Xylaria of the Xylariaceae. MS194, MS375 and MS1028 were close to the Clypeosphaeriaceae. MS191 and MS316 were closely related to the Pleosporaceae within the Dothideales. The other 5 morphospecies, MS786, MS1043, MS1065, MS1076 and MS1095, probably belong in the Xylariales. The value of using DNA sequence analysis in the identification of endophytes is discussed.
在香港对蒲葵叶片内生真菌进行了一项调查。利用形态特征鉴定出的内生真菌组合包括16个已命名物种和19个“形态种”,后者是根据培养形态和生长速率进行分组的。将分类单元排列成形态种并不能反映物种系统发育,因此基于核糖体DNA(rDNA)序列分析对选定的形态种进行了进一步鉴定。通过聚合酶链反应扩增并测序了19个代表性形态种的rDNA的5.8S基因及侧翼内转录间隔区(ITS1和ITS2)区域。基于5.8S基因序列的系统发育分析表明,这些形态种为丝状子囊菌,属于腔孢纲和核菌纲。通过对ITS和5.8S区域进行序列比较和系统发育分析进行了进一步鉴定。结果表明,MS704属于间座壳科的间座壳属及其无性型拟茎点霉属。推测MS594为球腔菌科的球腔菌属及其无性型枝孢属。MS339、MS366、MS370、MS395、MS1033、MS1083和MS1092被归入炭角菌科的炭角菌属。MS194、MS375和MS1028与盾球壳科相近。MS191和MS316与座囊菌目的格孢腔菌科密切相关。其他5个形态种,MS786、MS1043、MS1065、MS1076和MS1095,可能属于炭角菌目。文中讨论了利用DNA序列分析鉴定内生真菌的价值。