Innovation Group of Biometeorology and Animal Welfare, Animal Science Department, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, 14884-900, Jaboticabal, Brazil.
Innovation Group of Biometeorology and Animal Welfare, Animal Science Department, Federal University of Paraíba, 58 397 000, Areia, Brazil.
J Therm Biol. 2021 Apr;97:102879. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.102879. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
Closed colorimetric paper disc chambers and flow-through ventilated capsules are the most employed methods of measuring rates of local cutaneous evaporative water loss in cattle. However, we do not know if these methods show a close agreement with the total rate of cutaneous evaporative water loss derived from the weighing system (i.e., the gold standard method). We therefore combined a high-precision weighing system and flow through respirometry to accurately quantify the cutaneous evaporative water loss rates in shaded heifers, while simultaneously recording parallel data obtained from a flow-through ventilated capsule, and a closed colorimetric paper disc chamber. Least square means of the local surface-specific cutaneous evaporative water loss rate (g m h) derived from the colorimetric paper discs and ventilated capsules show close agreement to the total rate of surface-specific cutaneous evaporative water loss (g m h) derived from the weighing method. Likewise, fitted linear regression lines also showed that they were well correlated (e.g., R = 0.93 and r = 0.96 for ventilated capsule vs weighing method; and R = 0.81 and r = 0.91 for colorimetric paper discs vs weighing method). However, the mean square deviation revealed various sources of disagreement between the local measurements and those derived from the weighing method, in which the local rate of cutaneous evaporative water loss derived from colorimetric paper discs showed greater deviation. In conclusion, given the importance of cutaneous evaporative water loss for assessing temperature requirements and heat tolerance of cattle, our findings show large discrepancies derived from the closed colorimetric paper discs chamber when compared with parallel data derived from the gold standard method, which is sufficient to call into question previous findings obtained by employing such methods. Moreover, the flow-through ventilated capsule appears to be the most accurate method to assess the local rate of cutaneous evaporative water loss in cattle.
封闭式比色纸盘室和流通通风胶囊是测量牛局部皮肤蒸发水损失率最常用的方法。然而,我们不知道这些方法是否与称重系统(即金标准方法)得出的总皮肤蒸发水损失率密切一致。因此,我们将高精度称重系统与流通呼吸计结合使用,准确地量化了遮阳小母牛的皮肤蒸发水损失率,同时记录了来自流通通风胶囊和封闭式比色纸盘的平行数据。比色纸盘和通风胶囊得出的局部表面特异性皮肤蒸发水损失率(g m h)的最小二乘均值与称重法得出的总表面特异性皮肤蒸发水损失率(g m h)密切一致。同样,拟合线性回归线也表明它们相关性良好(例如,通风胶囊与称重法的 R = 0.93 和 r = 0.96;比色纸盘与称重法的 R = 0.81 和 r = 0.91)。然而,均方偏差揭示了局部测量值与称重法得出的值之间存在各种差异,其中比色纸盘得出的皮肤蒸发水损失率的局部值偏差较大。总之,鉴于皮肤蒸发水损失对评估牛的温度需求和耐热性的重要性,我们的发现表明,与金标准方法得出的平行数据相比,封闭式比色纸盘室得出的结果存在较大差异,足以对以前使用此类方法得出的发现提出质疑。此外,流通通风胶囊似乎是评估牛局部皮肤蒸发水损失率最准确的方法。