Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Division of Medical Education, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Watson Building, University of Brighton, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 9PH, UK.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Aug 25;44(3):685-693. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab096.
To examine the process and mechanisms of delivering obesity interventions to physically disabled children/adolescents.
PubMed, Medline, CINAHL Plus, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, Science Direct were systematically and manually searched for studies conducted in physically disabled children/adolescents (0-18 years). Included interventions were physical activity, diet and obesity prevention education. Included outcomes were body mass index (BMI)/weight and obesity prevention knowledge. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool aided methodological quality assessments. Data were extracted and delivery models were synthesized and narratively summarized using the social ecological model.
Seven studies of low (n = 4) and moderate (n = 3) scoring on methodological quality were eligible for inclusion. Study duration was 5 months or less (n = 5), 8 months (n = 1) and 2 years (n = 1). Interventions were delivered at home, school, hospital and rehabilitation centre through the internet, face-to-face and parents. No intervention was delivered at three or more levels of individual, interpersonal, institutional or community levels. No study reported significant outcomes on reduction in BMI/weight, or increase in obesity prevention knowledge.
Evidence reviewed in this study shows that obesity interventions for physically disabled children/adolescents lack both in delivery and design. Gaps revealed should be considered when developing interventions for this special population.
研究目的在于检验针对身体残疾儿童/青少年的肥胖干预措施的实施过程和机制。
系统检索了 PubMed、Medline、CINAHL Plus、Embase、Cochrane Library、Google Scholar、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Science Direct 中针对身体残疾儿童/青少年(0-18 岁)的研究。纳入的干预措施包括身体活动、饮食和肥胖预防教育。纳入的结果指标为体重指数(BMI)/体重和肥胖预防知识。使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)辅助评估方法学质量。使用社会生态学模型对数据进行提取,并对干预模式进行综合和叙述性总结。
有 7 项研究(低质量研究,n=4;中等质量研究,n=3)符合纳入标准。研究持续时间为 5 个月或更短(n=5)、8 个月(n=1)和 2 年(n=1)。干预措施在家庭、学校、医院和康复中心通过互联网、面对面和家长进行实施。没有任何干预措施在个体、人际、机构或社区三个或更多层面上进行实施。没有研究报告在 BMI/体重减轻或肥胖预防知识增加方面有显著结果。
本研究回顾的证据表明,针对身体残疾儿童/青少年的肥胖干预措施在实施和设计方面都存在不足。在为这一特殊人群制定干预措施时,应考虑到这些差距。