• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血清 CEA、CA24-2 和 CA19-9 对结直肠癌患者的临床价值。

Clinical Value of Serum CEA, CA24-2 and CA19-9 in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

出版信息

Clin Lab. 2021 Apr 1;67(4). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.200828.

DOI:10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.200828
PMID:33865243
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the clinical value of serum concentration of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 24-2 (CA24-2), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

The serum levels of tumor markers and KRAS/NRAS/PIK3CA/BRAF gene mutations were detected in patients with colorectal cancer. Clinical medical records in colorectal cancer patients were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 2,281 patients were recruited in the study, included 1,578 colorectal cancer patients and 703 controls. CEA, CA24-2, and CA19-9 concentrations were significantly higher in the colorectal cancer group than in the control group. The sensitivity of these tumor markers sorted in descending order was CEA>CA19-9>CA24-2. The best specificity was CA24-2, followed by CA19-9 and CEA, with all were more than 92%. The combination of CEA, CA19-9, and CA24-2 ranked the best sensitivity and specificity for colorectal cancer diagnosis. The prediction equation excluding the risk of colorectal cancer was. Probability (normal) = Exp (-5.47 - 0.28CEA - 0.11CA242 + 0.001CA199)/(1+ Exp (-5.47 - 0.28CEA - 0.11CA242 + 0.001CA199)). Besides, there were no significant differences in age, gender, histology type, differentiation, depth of invasion, and TNM stage in KRAS/ NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations compared with wild type.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum CEA, CA24-2, and CA19-9 are valuable indicators for predicting the risk of colorectal cancer.

摘要

背景

探讨癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原 24-2(CA24-2)和糖类抗原 19-9(CA19-9)血清浓度在结直肠癌(CRC)检测中的临床价值。

方法

检测结直肠癌患者的肿瘤标志物血清水平和 KRAS/NRAS/PIK3CA/BRAF 基因突变。收集结直肠癌患者的临床病历资料。

结果

共纳入 2281 例患者,其中结直肠癌患者 1578 例,对照组 703 例。结直肠癌组患者 CEA、CA24-2 和 CA19-9 浓度均明显高于对照组。这些肿瘤标志物的灵敏度依次为 CEA>CA19-9>CA24-2。最佳特异性为 CA24-2,其次是 CA19-9 和 CEA,均大于 92%。CEA、CA19-9 和 CA24-2 联合用于结直肠癌诊断的敏感性和特异性最佳。排除结直肠癌风险的预测方程为。概率(正常)=Exp(-5.47-0.28CEA-0.11CA242+0.001CA199)/(1+Exp(-5.47-0.28CEA-0.11CA242+0.001CA199))。此外,KRAS/NRAS、BRAF 和 PIK3CA 突变与野生型相比,在年龄、性别、组织学类型、分化程度、浸润深度和 TNM 分期方面无显著差异。

结论

血清 CEA、CA24-2 和 CA19-9 是预测结直肠癌风险的有价值指标。

相似文献

1
Clinical Value of Serum CEA, CA24-2 and CA19-9 in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.血清 CEA、CA24-2 和 CA19-9 对结直肠癌患者的临床价值。
Clin Lab. 2021 Apr 1;67(4). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.200828.
2
Evaluation of Clinical Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Preoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen, CA19-9, and CA24-2 for Colorectal Cancer.评价术前血清癌胚抗原、CA19-9 和 CA24-2 对结直肠癌的临床诊断和预后价值。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2023 Sep;29(6):192-197.
3
Tumor markers for diagnosis, monitoring of recurrence and prognosis in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer.用于上消化道癌患者诊断、复发监测及预后评估的肿瘤标志物。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(23):10267-72. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.23.10267.
4
Clinical assessment and prognostic evaluation of tumor markers in patients with gastric cancer.胃癌患者肿瘤标志物的临床评估与预后评价。
Int J Biol Markers. 2013 Jun 28;28(2):192-200. doi: 10.5301/jbm.5000023.
5
[Diagnostic value of F-FDG PET/CT and tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, CA24-2) in recurrence and metastasis of postoperative colorectal moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma].[¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT与肿瘤标志物(癌胚抗原、糖类抗原19-9、糖类抗原24-2)对结直肠中分化腺癌术后复发及转移的诊断价值]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Dec 18;51(6):1071-1077. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.06.017.
6
Expression Levels and Clinical Significance of Serum miR-497, CEA, CA24-2, and HBsAg in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.血清 miR-497、CEA、CA24-2 和 HBsAg 在结直肠癌患者中的表达水平及临床意义。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Aug 11;2022:3541403. doi: 10.1155/2022/3541403. eCollection 2022.
7
Combined detection of preoperative serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA242 improve prognostic prediction of surgically treated colorectal cancer patients.术前血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)和糖类抗原242(CA242)联合检测可改善接受手术治疗的结直肠癌患者的预后预测。
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 Nov 1;8(11):14853-63. eCollection 2015.
8
[Detection and clinical study of serum tumor markers in patients with colorectal cancer].[结直肠癌患者血清肿瘤标志物的检测及临床研究]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2005 May;27(5):286-8.
9
Applicative Value of Serum CA19-9, CEA, CA125 and CA242 in Diagnosis and Prognosis for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Treated by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.血清CA19-9、CEA、CA125和CA242在同步放化疗治疗的胰腺癌患者诊断及预后中的应用价值
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(15):6569-73. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.15.6569.
10
Carbohydrate antigen 242 highly consists with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer: study on 185 cases.糖链抗原 242 在结直肠癌的诊断和预后中与糖链抗原 19-9 高度一致:185 例研究。
Med Oncol. 2012 Jun;29(2):1030-6. doi: 10.1007/s12032-011-9967-z. Epub 2011 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of two combined methods of P53 expression and preoperative serum CEA detection on the prognosis of colorectal cancer.P53表达与术前血清癌胚抗原检测两种联合方法对结直肠癌预后的影响
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 21;15:1590836. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1590836. eCollection 2025.
2
Non-invasive colorectal cancer biomarkers: HAND2 and GPM6A methylation in circulating tumour DNA.非侵入性结直肠癌生物标志物:循环肿瘤DNA中的HAND2和GPM6A甲基化
Cancer Cell Int. 2025 Jul 18;25(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12935-025-03898-5.
3
Combining radiomics and deep learning to predict liver metastasis of gastric cancer on CT image.
结合放射组学和深度学习在CT图像上预测胃癌肝转移
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 24;15:1613972. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1613972. eCollection 2025.
4
A commentary on "Predicting disease-free survival following curative-intent resection of right-sided colon cancer using a pre-and post-operative nomogram: a prospective observational cohort study".对“使用术前和术后列线图预测右侧结肠癌根治性切除术后无病生存率:一项前瞻性观察队列研究”的述评
Int J Surg. 2025 Sep 1;111(9):6585-6587. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002760. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
5
Clinical Implications of Cell-Free DNA in Managing V600E Mutation-Positive Colorectal Cancer.游离DNA在V600E突变阳性结直肠癌管理中的临床意义
Genes (Basel). 2025 Feb 25;16(3):275. doi: 10.3390/genes16030275.
6
The combined evaluation of preoperative serum CEA and postoperative tissue CEA as a prognostic factor in stages 0-IV colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.术前血清癌胚抗原(CEA)与术后组织CEA联合评估作为0-IV期结直肠癌预后因素的回顾性队列研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 3;11:1447041. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1447041. eCollection 2024.
7
Targeted metabolomics reveals novel diagnostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer.靶向代谢组学揭示了用于结直肠癌的新型诊断生物标志物。
Mol Oncol. 2025 Jun;19(6):1737-1750. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13791. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
8
Construction of diagnostic models with machine-learning algorithms for colorectal cancer based on clinical laboratory parameters.基于临床实验室参数,使用机器学习算法构建结直肠癌诊断模型。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Oct 31;15(5):2145-2156. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-516. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
9
Biosensors for Cancer Biomarkers Based on Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles.基于介孔硅纳米粒子的癌症生物标志物生物传感器。
Biosensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 30;14(7):326. doi: 10.3390/bios14070326.
10
Identification and validation of a novel 17 coagulation-related genes signature for predicting prognostic risk in colorectal cancer.一种用于预测结直肠癌预后风险的新型17个凝血相关基因特征的鉴定与验证
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 7;10(12):e32687. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32687. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.