Suppr超能文献

异常胎盘灌注与死胎风险:一项基于医院的回顾性队列研究。

Abnormal placental perfusion and the risk of stillbirth: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 566 Fangxie Rd, Shanghai, 200011, China.

Department of Ultrasound, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 17;21(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03776-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A lack of information on specific and interventional factors for stillbirth has made designing preventive strategies difficult, and the stillbirth rate has declined more slowly than the neonatal death rate. We compared the prevalence of stillbirth among the offspring of women with or without abnormal placental perfusion (APP).

METHODS

We conducted a hospital-based retrospective cohort study involving women with a singleton pregnancy between 2012 and 2016 (N = 41,632). Multivariate analysis was performed to compare the prevalence of stillbirth in infants exposed to APP (defined as any abnormality in right or left uterine artery pulsatility index or resistance index [UtA-PI, -RI] [e.g., > 95th percentile] or presence of early diastolic notching) with that in those not exposed to APP.

RESULTS

Stillbirths were more common among women with APP than among those with normal placental perfusion (stillbirth rate, 4.3 ‰ vs 0.9 ‰; odds ratio (OR), 4.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.2 to 8.0). The association strengths were consistent across groups of infants exposed to APP that separately defined by abnormality in right or left UtA-PI or -RI (OR ranged from 3.2 to 5.3; all P ≤ 0.008). The associations were slightly stronger for the unexplained stillbirths. Most of the unexplained stillbirth risk was attributed to APP (59.0%), while a foetal sex disparity existed (94.5% for males and 58.0% for females). Women with normal placental perfusion and a male foetus had higher credibility (e.g., higher specificities) in excluding stillbirths than those with APP and a female foetus at any given false negative rate from 1 to 10% (93.4% ~ 94.1% vs. 12.3% ~ 14.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

APP is associated with and accounts for most of the unexplained stillbirth risk. Different mechanisms exist between the sexes. The performance of screening for stillbirth may be improved by stratification according to sex and placental perfusion.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏关于具体和干预因素的信息,导致设计预防策略变得困难,而且死产率的下降速度比新生儿死亡率慢。我们比较了有或没有异常胎盘灌注(APP)的女性所生子女的死产发生率。

方法

我们进行了一项基于医院的回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2012 年至 2016 年间单胎妊娠的女性(N=41632)。采用多变量分析比较了 APP 暴露(定义为右或左子宫动脉搏动指数或阻力指数[UtA-PI,-RI]异常[例如,>第 95 百分位数]或存在舒张早期切迹)与未暴露于 APP 的婴儿的死产发生率。

结果

APP 组的死产发生率高于胎盘灌注正常组(死产率,4.3‰比 0.9‰;比值比(OR),4.2;95%置信区间[CI],2.2 至 8.0)。在分别由右或左 UtA-PI 或 -RI 异常定义的 APP 暴露组中,关联强度一致(OR 范围为 3.2 至 5.3;所有 P 值均≤0.008)。对于不明原因的死产,关联强度稍强。大部分不明原因的死产风险归因于 APP(59.0%),而存在胎儿性别差异(男性为 94.5%,女性为 58.0%)。在任何给定的假阴性率从 1%到 10%(93.4%94.1%比 12.3%14.0%),胎盘灌注正常且为男性胎儿的女性排除死产的可信度(例如,特异性更高)高于 APP 且为女性胎儿的女性。

结论

APP 与大部分不明原因的死产风险相关,并解释了大部分死产风险。男女之间存在不同的机制。根据性别和胎盘灌注进行分层,可能会提高死产筛查的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2399/8052678/9f1c988c912a/12884_2021_3776_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验