• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于获取无牙下颌弓种植体之间角度和距离的口内扫描设备的准确性。

Trueness of a device for intraoral scanning to capture the angle and distance between implants in edentulous mandibular arches.

机构信息

DDS, MSc student, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

DDS, MSc, PhD student, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Dec;128(6):1310-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.039. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.039
PMID:33865563
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The digitalization of completely edentulous arches presents limitations because of the lack of anatomic structures for best-fit alignment during the image generation process of the scanner's software program.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate a new device for intraoral scanning and to analyze its usefulness in capturing the 3-dimensional (3D) position of implants in edentulous mandibular arches.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The 3D positions of 40 implants in 10 participants with fixed interim mandibular prostheses were evaluated by comparing 3 scanning techniques. Images were generated in 2 experimental groups, with digital scan bodies (group SC) and with the scanning device (group SD) and in a control group (group CT) in which images were obtained by laboratory scanning of casts produced from splinted impression copings. The standard tessellation language (STL) files were superimposed by using a reverse engineering software program to measure the 3D coordinate system. Variations in implant linear displacements (Δx, Δy, and Δz), total 3D displacement (Δx+Δy+Δz), and angle projections (ΔθXY, ΔθXZ, and ΔθYZ) were statistically analyzed (α=.05). The distances between the implants were also measured. The Spearman correlation coefficient (α=.05) was used to find the correlation between the 3D coordinates and the distances between the implants.

RESULTS

Group SD had lower values for linear displacement than group SC; however, this difference was not statistically significant except for implant #2. The overall evaluation showed a significant difference with better accuracy for group SD. Concerning angular displacements, group SD showed lesser angular variation for the 3 projection planes. For the distances between the implants, significant differences were only observed for the "all" assessment in which group SD behaved similarly to group CT, while group SC showed the highest values (P<.05). No correlation was detected between the axes (x, y, and z) and the distances between the implants.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluated scanning device led to improved trueness for linear, angular displacements, and distances between implants in mandibular edentulous arches.

摘要

问题陈述

由于扫描仪软件程序的图像生成过程中缺乏最佳拟合的解剖结构,完全无牙弓的数字化呈现出局限性。

目的

本临床研究的目的是评估一种新的口内扫描设备,并分析其在捕获无牙下颌弓中种植体的三维(3D)位置方面的有用性。

材料与方法

通过比较 3 种扫描技术,评估了 10 名佩戴固定临时下颌义齿的参与者的 40 个种植体的 3D 位置。在 2 个实验组中生成图像,使用数字扫描体(组 SC)和扫描设备(组 SD),在对照组(组 CT)中,通过实验室扫描从带夹板印模帽获得的模型来获取图像。使用逆向工程软件程序将标准三角测量语言(STL)文件叠加,以测量 3D 坐标系。对种植体线性位移(Δx、Δy 和 Δz)、总 3D 位移(Δx+Δy+Δz)和角度投影(ΔθXY、ΔθXZ 和 ΔθYZ)的变化进行了统计学分析(α=.05)。还测量了种植体之间的距离。使用 Spearman 相关系数(α=.05)来确定 3D 坐标和种植体之间距离之间的相关性。

结果

组 SD 的线性位移值低于组 SC,但除了 #2 号种植体外,这种差异没有统计学意义。总体评估显示,组 SD 的准确性更高,差异有统计学意义。关于角度位移,组 SD 在 3 个投影平面上的角度变化较小。对于种植体之间的距离,仅在“全部”评估中观察到显著差异,其中组 SD 的行为类似于组 CT,而组 SC 表现出最高值(P<.05)。未检测到轴(x、y 和 z)和种植体之间距离之间的相关性。

结论

评估的扫描设备提高了下颌无牙弓中线性、角度位移和种植体之间距离的准确性。

相似文献

1
Trueness of a device for intraoral scanning to capture the angle and distance between implants in edentulous mandibular arches.一种用于获取无牙下颌弓种植体之间角度和距离的口内扫描设备的准确性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Dec;128(6):1310-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.039. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
2
Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression.常规开口托盘印模与口腔内数字化扫描在种植体支持全口印模中的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Dec;122(6):543-549. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.018. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
3
Effect of scan body designs and internal conical angles on the 3-dimensional accuracy of implant digital scans.扫描体设计和内圆锥角对种植体数字扫描三维精度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Jul;132(1):190.e1-190.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.04.008. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
4
Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods.口内和口外扫描的准确性:两种扫描方法中种植体之间距离的三维偏差和影响。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Jul-Sep;22(3):279-287. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_108_22.
5
Evaluating the effects of splinting implant scan bodies intraorally on the trueness of complete arch digital scans: A clinical study.评价口内就位种植体扫描体对全牙弓数字扫描精度的影响:一项临床研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Oct;132(4):781.e1-781.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.004. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
6
Accuracy of photogrammetric imaging versus conventional impressions for complete arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A comparative clinical study.摄影成像与传统印模在全弓种植体支持固定义齿修复中的准确性比较:一项临床对比研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Aug;130(2):212-218. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.035. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
7
A Clinical Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Accuracy between Digital and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques.数字化与传统种植体印模技术三维精度的临床对比研究。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Apr;28(4):e902-e908. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12764. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
8
Accuracy of impressions for multiple implants: A comparative study of digital and conventional techniques.多颗种植体印模精度的比较研究:数字化与传统技术的对比。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Nov;128(5):1017-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.016. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
9
Influence of splinting scan bodies or incorporating three-dimensionally printed scan aids on the trueness of complete arch digital scans.扫描体加或不加三维打印扫描辅助物对全牙弓数字扫描准确性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Oct;132(4):828.e1-828.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.001. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
10
Trueness and precision of complete-arch photogrammetry implant scanning assessed with a coordinate-measuring machine.使用坐标测量机评估全牙弓摄影测量种植体扫描的准确性和精确性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Jan;129(1):160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.05.019. Epub 2021 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of photogrammetric imaging, intraoral scanning and conventional impression accuracy of full-arch dental implant rehabilitation: an in vitro study.全牙弓牙种植修复的摄影测量成像、口内扫描与传统印模准确性的比较:一项体外研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 21;25(1):753. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06029-8.
2
Accuracy of Full-Arch Intraoral Scans Versus Conventional Impression: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis and a Proposal to Standardise the Analysis of the Accuracy.全口内扫描与传统印模的准确性:一项包含荟萃分析的系统评价及准确性分析标准化建议
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 27;14(1):71. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010071.
3
Reverse engineering in medical application: literature review, proof of concept and future perspectives.
医学应用中的逆向工程:文献综述、概念验证及未来展望。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 9;14(1):23621. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74176-z.
4
Knowledge structure and research hotspots on digital scanning for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis: A bibliometric analysis.种植支持全牙弓修复体数字扫描的知识结构与研究热点:一项文献计量分析
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 23;10(17):e36782. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36782. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
5
Assessment of the accuracy of 3D printed medical models through reverse engineering.通过逆向工程评估3D打印医学模型的准确性。
Heliyon. 2024 May 24;10(11):e31829. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31829. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
6
[Research progress on accuracy of intraoral digital impressions for implant-supported prostheses in edentulous jaw].[无牙颌种植支持修复体口内数字化印模准确性的研究进展]
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Oct 25;53(5):569-577. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0079.
7
Effect of a Novel 'Scan Body' on the In Vitro Scanning Accuracy of Full-Arch Implant Impressions.新型“扫描体”对全口种植体印模体外扫描精度的影响。
Int Dent J. 2024 Aug;74(4):847-854. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.01.015. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
8
Influence of Implant Adjacent Teeth on the Accuracy of Digital Impression.种植体相邻牙齿对数字印模准确性的影响。
Eur J Dent. 2024 Feb;18(1):349-355. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771031. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
9
Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods.口内和口外扫描的准确性:两种扫描方法中种植体之间距离的三维偏差和影响。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Jul-Sep;22(3):279-287. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_108_22.
10
Conventional and digital impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: time, implant quantity effect and patient satisfaction.全牙弓种植体支持的固定修复体的传统印模与数字印模:时间、种植体数量影响及患者满意度
J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Aug;14(4):212-222. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.4.212. Epub 2022 Aug 29.