• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无缝线瓣膜在主动脉瓣再次置换术中的应用:国际前瞻性注册研究结果。

Sutureless Valve in Repeated Aortic Valve Replacement: Results from an International Prospective Registry.

机构信息

46769 Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milano, Italy.

70401 Libin Cardiovascular Institute and University, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Innovations (Phila). 2021 May-Jun;16(3):273-279. doi: 10.1177/1556984521999323. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1177/1556984521999323
PMID:33866845
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report early and midterm results registry of patients undergoing repeated aortic valve replacement (RAVR) with sutureless prostheses from an international prospective registry (SURE-AVR).

METHODS

Between March 2011 and June 2019, 69 patients underwent RAVR with self-expandable sutureless aortic bioprostheses at 22 international cardiac centers.

RESULTS

Overall mortality was 2.9% with a predicted logistic EuroSCORE II of 10.7%. Indications for RAVR were structural valve dysfunction (84.1%) and infective prosthetic endocarditis (15.9%) and were performed in patients with previously implanted bioprostheses (79.7%), mechanical valves (15.9%), and transcatheter valves (4.3%). Minimally invasive approach was performed in 15.9% of patients. Rate of stroke was 1.4% and rate of early valve-related reintervention was 1.4%. Overall survival rate at 1 and 5 years was 97% and 91%, respectively. No major paravalvular leak occurred. Rate of pacemaker implantation was 5.8% and 0.9% per patient-year early and at follow-up, respectively. The mean transvalvular gradient at 1-year and 5-year follow-up was 10.5 mm Hg and 11.5 mm Hg with a median effective orifice area of 1.8 cmand 1.8 cm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RAVR with sutureless valves is a safe and effective approach and provides excellent clinical and hemodynamic results up to 5 years.

摘要

目的

报告一项国际性前瞻性注册研究(SURE-AVR)中接受无缝线瓣膜重复主动脉瓣置换术(RAVR)患者的早期和中期结果。

方法

2011 年 3 月至 2019 年 6 月,在 22 个国际心脏中心,69 例患者接受了自膨式无缝线生物主动脉瓣的 RAVR。

结果

总体死亡率为 2.9%,预测的 logistic EuroSCORE II 为 10.7%。RAVR 的适应证为结构性瓣膜功能障碍(84.1%)和感染性人工瓣膜心内膜炎(15.9%),并在先前植入生物瓣(79.7%)、机械瓣(15.9%)和经导管瓣膜(4.3%)的患者中进行。微创方法在 15.9%的患者中进行。卒中和早期瓣膜相关再干预的发生率分别为 1.4%和 1.4%。1 年和 5 年的总生存率分别为 97%和 91%。无重大瓣周漏发生。起搏器植入率分别为每例患者每年 5.8%和 0.9%,早期和随访时。1 年和 5 年随访时的平均跨瓣梯度分别为 10.5mmHg 和 11.5mmHg,中位有效瓣口面积分别为 1.8cm 和 1.8cm。

结论

无缝线瓣膜的 RAVR 是一种安全有效的方法,可提供出色的临床和血液动力学结果,最长可达 5 年。

相似文献

1
Sutureless Valve in Repeated Aortic Valve Replacement: Results from an International Prospective Registry.无缝线瓣膜在主动脉瓣再次置换术中的应用:国际前瞻性注册研究结果。
Innovations (Phila). 2021 May-Jun;16(3):273-279. doi: 10.1177/1556984521999323. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
2
Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement with Sutureless Valves: Results From an International Prospective Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的效果评价:一项国际前瞻性注册研究。
Innovations (Phila). 2020 Mar/Apr;15(2):120-130. doi: 10.1177/1556984519892585. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
3
Clinical outcomes after implantation of a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis with concomitant mitral valve surgery: the SURE-AVR registry.同期行二尖瓣手术植入免缝合主动脉生物瓣后的临床转归:SURE-AVR 注册研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 May 30;16(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01523-w.
4
Clinical performance of a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis: five-year results of the 3f Enable long-term follow-up study.无缝合主动脉生物假体的临床性能:3F Enable长期随访研究的五年结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;148(4):1681-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.054. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
5
Risk predictors that impact long-term prognosis in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with the Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis.经 Perceval 无缝线生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术治疗的患者中影响长期预后的风险预测因素。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Oct;55:10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
6
Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.主动脉瓣置换术治疗严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄:无缝合 versus 传统生物瓣。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;161(3):920-932. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.11.162. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
7
The sutureless aortic valve at 1 year: A large multicenter cohort study.一年期无缝合主动脉瓣:一项大型多中心队列研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jun;151(6):1617-1626.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.12.064. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
8
Sutureless aortic valve replacement with Perceval bioprosthesis: are there predicting factors for postoperative pacemaker implantation?使用Perceval生物瓣膜进行无缝合主动脉瓣置换术:术后起搏器植入有无预测因素?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;22(3):253-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv330. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
9
Right anterior minithoracotomy aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: Early outcomes and 1-year follow-up from 2 European centers.右胸前外侧小切口主动脉瓣置换术联合应用无缝线生物瓣:来自欧洲 2 个中心的早期结果和 1 年随访。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Apr;149(4):1052-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.12.017. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
10
Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗失败的外科生物瓣的再次手术主动脉瓣置换术与再次手术主动脉瓣置换术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 20;11(24):e7965. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024848. Epub 2022 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic impact of small size sutureless prostheses: results for 241 patients from an international registry.小型无缝合人工瓣膜的预后影响:来自国际注册研究的241例患者的结果
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Jul 25;20(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s13019-025-03558-9.
2
Right anterior mini thoracotomy for redo cardiac surgery: case series from North America and Europe.右前侧小切口再次心脏手术:来自北美和欧洲的病例系列
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jun 18;11:1427930. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1427930. eCollection 2024.
3
Valve Type and Operative Risks in Surgical Explantation of Transcatheter Aortic Valves: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
经导管主动脉瓣外科取出术中的瓣膜类型与手术风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 23;13(5):1262. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051262.
4
Treating Mitroflow dysfunction by means of an open valve-in-valve Perceval implantation.通过开放式瓣中瓣Perceval植入术治疗Mitroflow功能障碍。
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2023 Mar;20(1):65-66. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2023.126105. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
5
Perceval valve intermediate outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis at 5-year follow-up.佩尔塞瓦尔瓣膜中期结果:5 年随访的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Apr 11;18(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02273-7.