Chow Michael S, Haller Leonard, Chambers Tamara, Reder Lindsay, O'Dell Karla
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA.
Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Mar 8;6(2):277-282. doi: 10.1002/lio2.547. eCollection 2021 Apr.
To evaluate the role of hospital setting on outcomes in open airway surgery by comparing patients who underwent surgery (cricotracheal resection [CTR] or tracheal resection [TR]) at a publicly funded county hospital vs a private university hospital.
Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing CTR or TR at two institutions; a private university hospital and a publicly funded county hospital from September 2014 to September 2019. Length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, total time to discharge, minor and major complications were the primary endpoints. Significance was defined as a -value less than .05.
There were a total of 43 patients (17 county, 26 university) who had CTR or TR during the study period. Length of stay outcomes was reported as mean length of stay ± SD. There was a significant difference in ICU stay at the county hospital (7.17 (±5.36 days) compared to the university hospital (2.52 ± 1.85 days, < .003) and a nearly significant total length of stay difference at the county hospital (12.4 ± 9.06 days) compared to the university hospital (7.84 ± 4 days, < .072) There was overall a low incidence of complications but slightly more in the county compared to the university population.
Patients who underwent open airway surgery at the county hospital were more likely to have a longer ICU stay and slight increase in complications despite having a lower ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification and younger age. These outcomes are multifactorial and may be related to poorer access to primary care preoperatively leading to delay in diagnosis and treatment, poorly controlled or undiagnosed medical comorbidities, and differences in hospital resources.
IV.
通过比较在公立县级医院与私立大学医院接受手术(环状气管切除术[CTR]或气管切除术[TR])的患者,评估医院环境对气道开放手术结局的作用。
对在两家机构(一家私立大学医院和一家公立县级医院)接受CTR或TR的患者进行回顾性病历审查;时间范围为2014年9月至2019年9月。重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、总出院时间、轻微和严重并发症是主要终点。显著性定义为P值小于0.05。
在研究期间共有43例患者(17例来自县级医院,26例来自大学医院)接受了CTR或TR。住院时间结果报告为平均住院时间±标准差。县级医院的ICU住院时间(7.17(±5.36天))与大学医院(2.52±1.85天,P<0.003)存在显著差异,县级医院的总住院时间(12.4±9.06天)与大学医院(7.84±4天,P<0.072)也存在近乎显著的差异。总体并发症发生率较低,但县级医院的患者比大学医院的患者略多。
在县级医院接受气道开放手术的患者,尽管美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级较低且年龄较小,但更有可能有更长的ICU住院时间,并发症也略有增加。这些结果是多因素的,可能与术前初级保健可及性较差导致诊断和治疗延迟、医疗合并症控制不佳或未被诊断以及医院资源差异有关。
IV级。