Social and Administrative Sciences Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):56-65. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13660. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
To estimate the impact of the Medicare Part D coverage gap reform under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on the utilization of and expenditures for prescription drugs within the first five years of the policy's implementation.
2008-2015 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS).
We used a difference-in-differences approach to estimate the year-by-year changes in prescription drug use and expenditures before (2006-2010) and after (2011-2015) the ACA's Part D coverage gap reform between Part D beneficiaries not receiving the Low-Income Subsidy (LIS) and those receiving the LIS.
The study sample included Part D beneficiaries (a) aged 65 years or older; (b) not disabled or having end-stage renal disease; (c) continuously enrolled in a Part D plan (d) having at least one prescription fill in a given year. Survey-reported and administrative Part D events data in the MCBS were used for the analyses.
After the ACA reform, annual out-of-pocket drug spending significantly decreased by $88 (P < .01) among non-LIS beneficiaries compared to LIS beneficiaries, with growing decreases over time (average decreases of $41 in 2011, $49 in 2012, $105 in 2013, and $135 in 2015, P < .01 or <.05). Changes in out-of-pocket costs were largely driven by significant decreases among brand-name drugs (overall decrease of $106, P < .01). Despite significantly reduced out-of-pocket spending, there were no significant changes in the overall number of 30-day drug fills and total drug spending; however, changes in the use of brand-name and generic drugs were seen after the ACA (increase of 1.9 fills for brand-name drugs and decrease of 2.3 fills for generic drug in 2015, P < .05).
The ACA coverage gap reform has helped to reduce the out-of-pocket drug cost burden for beneficiaries, although it had no noticeable impact on drug use or total drug spending.
评估平价医疗法案(ACA)下的医疗保险处方药部分覆盖缺口改革对该政策实施的头五年内处方药的使用和支出的影响。
2008-2015 年医疗保险当前受益人调查(MCBS)。
我们采用差异法估计在 ACA 的处方药部分覆盖缺口改革前后(2006-2010 年和 2011-2015 年),未获得低收入补贴(LIS)和获得 LIS 的处方药部分受益人之间,处方药使用和支出的逐年变化。
研究样本包括(a)65 岁或以上的处方药部分受益人;(b)非残疾或终末期肾病患者;(c)连续参加处方药计划;(d)在给定年份至少有一次处方。MCBS 中的调查报告和行政处方药事件数据用于分析。
ACA 改革后,非 LIS 受益人的年度自付药物支出与 LIS 受益人相比显著减少了 88 美元(P<0.01),且随着时间的推移呈下降趋势(2011 年平均减少 41 美元,2012 年减少 49 美元,2013 年减少 105 美元,2015 年减少 135 美元,P<0.01 或<.05)。自付费用的变化主要归因于品牌药物显著减少(整体减少 106 美元,P<0.01)。尽管自付支出显著减少,但 30 天药物配药总数和总药物支出没有显著变化;然而,ACA 后品牌药和仿制药的使用发生了变化(2015 年品牌药增加 1.9 配药,仿制药减少 2.3 配药,P<0.05)。
ACA 覆盖缺口改革有助于减轻受益人的自付药物费用负担,尽管对药物使用或总药物支出没有明显影响。