• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Five-year impact of Medicare Part D coverage gap reform on drug expenditures and utilization.医疗保险部分 D 覆盖缺口改革对药品支出和利用的五年影响。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):56-65. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13660. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
2
Part D coverage gap reform: trends in drug use and expenditures.D 部分覆盖缺口改革:药物使用和支出趋势。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Aug;26(8):349-356. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.44071.
3
Closing the Medicare Doughnut Hole: Changes in Prescription Drug Utilization and Out-of-Pocket Spending Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Part D Coverage After the Affordable Care Act.填补医疗保险的“甜甜圈洞”:《平价医疗法案》实施后,参加D部分保险的医疗保险受益人的处方药使用情况和自付费用变化
Med Care. 2017 Jan;55(1):43-49. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000613.
4
Medicare Beneficiaries Face Growing Out-Of-Pocket Burden For Specialty Drugs While In Catastrophic Coverage Phase.医疗保险受益人在灾难性保险阶段面临专科药物自付费用不断增加的负担。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Sep 1;35(9):1564-71. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0418.
5
The Impact of Medicare Part D on the Proportion of Out-of-Pocket Prescription Drug Costs Among Older Adults With Diabetes.医疗保险处方药部分对老年糖尿病患者自付处方药费用比例的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Apr;40(4):502-508. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0902. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
6
Analysis of Proposed Medicare Part B to Part D Shift With Associated Changes in Total Spending and Patient Cost-Sharing for Prescription Drugs.分析拟议的医疗保险 B 部分到 D 部分的转变以及处方药总支出和患者自付费用的相关变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):374-380. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6417.
7
In-gap discounts in Medicare Part D and specialty drug use.医疗保险计划 D 中的缺口折扣与专科药物使用。
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Sep;23(9):553-559.
8
Patient and Payer Incentives to Use Patented Brand-Name Drugs vs Authorized Generic Drugs in Medicare Part D.医疗保险计划 D 中患者和付款人的专利品牌药与授权仿制药使用激励因素
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Dec 1;181(12):1605-1611. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.5997.
9
Health Costs and Outcomes Associated with Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Cost-Sharing in Beneficiaries on Dialysis.与透析受益人的医疗保险处方药自付费用相关的健康成本和结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Oct;21(10):956-64. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.10.956.
10
The Effect of Medicare Part D on Prescription Drug Spending and Health Care Use: 6 Years of Follow-up, 2007-2012.医疗保险处方药部分对处方药支出和医疗保健使用的影响:2007-2012 年 6 年随访结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jan;23(1):5-12. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.1.5.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimated Out-of-Pocket Costs for Patients With Common Cancers and Private Insurance.患有常见癌症且拥有私人保险的患者的自付费用估计
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2521575. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.21575.

本文引用的文献

1
In-gap discounts in Medicare Part D and specialty drug use.医疗保险计划 D 中的缺口折扣与专科药物使用。
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Sep;23(9):553-559.
2
Three-Year Impacts Of The Affordable Care Act: Improved Medical Care And Health Among Low-Income Adults.平价医疗法案的三年影响:改善了低收入成年人的医疗保健和健康状况。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jun 1;36(6):1119-1128. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0293. Epub 2017 May 17.
3
Medicare Part D Implementation and Associated Health Impact Among Older Adults in the United States.美国老年人的医疗保险部分 D 实施情况及相关健康影响。
Int J Health Serv. 2018 Jan;48(1):42-56. doi: 10.1177/0020731416676226. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
4
Closing the Medicare Doughnut Hole: Changes in Prescription Drug Utilization and Out-of-Pocket Spending Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Part D Coverage After the Affordable Care Act.填补医疗保险的“甜甜圈洞”:《平价医疗法案》实施后,参加D部分保险的医疗保险受益人的处方药使用情况和自付费用变化
Med Care. 2017 Jan;55(1):43-49. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000613.
5
Medicare Part D's Effects on Drug Utilization and Out-of-Pocket Costs: A Systematic Review.医疗保险D部分对药物使用和自付费用的影响:一项系统评价。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Oct;52(5):1685-1728. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12534. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
6
High cost sharing and specialty drug initiation under Medicare Part D: a case study in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia.医疗保险D部分下的高额费用分担与专科药物起始治疗:新诊断慢性髓性白血病患者的案例研究
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Mar;22(4 Suppl):s78-86.
7
Anticipatory Behavior in Response to Medicare Part D's Coverage Gap.应对医疗保险D部分覆盖缺口的预期行为。
Health Econ. 2017 Mar;26(3):338-351. doi: 10.1002/hec.3311. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
8
Effects of Medicare Part D coverage gap on medication adherence.医疗保险 D 部分缺口对药物依从性的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2013 Jun 1;19(6):e214-24.
9
Effects of coverage gap reform on adherence to diabetes medications.保障缺口改革对糖尿病药物治疗依从性的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2013 Apr;19(4):308-16.
10
The effect of the US Medicare Part D coverage gaps on medication use among patients with depression and heart failure.美国医疗保险D部分覆盖缺口对抑郁症和心力衰竭患者用药的影响。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2012 Sep;15(3):105-18.

医疗保险部分 D 覆盖缺口改革对药品支出和利用的五年影响。

Five-year impact of Medicare Part D coverage gap reform on drug expenditures and utilization.

机构信息

Social and Administrative Sciences Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):56-65. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13660. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.13660
PMID:33870486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8763289/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the impact of the Medicare Part D coverage gap reform under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on the utilization of and expenditures for prescription drugs within the first five years of the policy's implementation.

DATA SOURCES

2008-2015 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS).

STUDY DESIGN

We used a difference-in-differences approach to estimate the year-by-year changes in prescription drug use and expenditures before (2006-2010) and after (2011-2015) the ACA's Part D coverage gap reform between Part D beneficiaries not receiving the Low-Income Subsidy (LIS) and those receiving the LIS.

DATA COLLECTION

The study sample included Part D beneficiaries (a) aged 65 years or older; (b) not disabled or having end-stage renal disease; (c) continuously enrolled in a Part D plan (d) having at least one prescription fill in a given year. Survey-reported and administrative Part D events data in the MCBS were used for the analyses.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

After the ACA reform, annual out-of-pocket drug spending significantly decreased by $88 (P < .01) among non-LIS beneficiaries compared to LIS beneficiaries, with growing decreases over time (average decreases of $41 in 2011, $49 in 2012, $105 in 2013, and $135 in 2015, P < .01 or <.05). Changes in out-of-pocket costs were largely driven by significant decreases among brand-name drugs (overall decrease of $106, P < .01). Despite significantly reduced out-of-pocket spending, there were no significant changes in the overall number of 30-day drug fills and total drug spending; however, changes in the use of brand-name and generic drugs were seen after the ACA (increase of 1.9 fills for brand-name drugs and decrease of 2.3 fills for generic drug in 2015, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The ACA coverage gap reform has helped to reduce the out-of-pocket drug cost burden for beneficiaries, although it had no noticeable impact on drug use or total drug spending.

摘要

目的

评估平价医疗法案(ACA)下的医疗保险处方药部分覆盖缺口改革对该政策实施的头五年内处方药的使用和支出的影响。

数据来源

2008-2015 年医疗保险当前受益人调查(MCBS)。

研究设计

我们采用差异法估计在 ACA 的处方药部分覆盖缺口改革前后(2006-2010 年和 2011-2015 年),未获得低收入补贴(LIS)和获得 LIS 的处方药部分受益人之间,处方药使用和支出的逐年变化。

数据收集

研究样本包括(a)65 岁或以上的处方药部分受益人;(b)非残疾或终末期肾病患者;(c)连续参加处方药计划;(d)在给定年份至少有一次处方。MCBS 中的调查报告和行政处方药事件数据用于分析。

主要发现

ACA 改革后,非 LIS 受益人的年度自付药物支出与 LIS 受益人相比显著减少了 88 美元(P<0.01),且随着时间的推移呈下降趋势(2011 年平均减少 41 美元,2012 年减少 49 美元,2013 年减少 105 美元,2015 年减少 135 美元,P<0.01 或<.05)。自付费用的变化主要归因于品牌药物显著减少(整体减少 106 美元,P<0.01)。尽管自付支出显著减少,但 30 天药物配药总数和总药物支出没有显著变化;然而,ACA 后品牌药和仿制药的使用发生了变化(2015 年品牌药增加 1.9 配药,仿制药减少 2.3 配药,P<0.05)。

结论

ACA 覆盖缺口改革有助于减轻受益人的自付药物费用负担,尽管对药物使用或总药物支出没有明显影响。