• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国与奥地利的医疗保健需求和体系比较。

A Comparison of the United States and Austrian Healthcare Needs and Systems.

机构信息

Clayton State University, Morrow, GA, USA.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211000162. doi: 10.1177/00469580211000162.

DOI:10.1177/00469580211000162
PMID:33870743
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8058800/
Abstract

Austria and the United States have very different healthcare systems with Austria following a social insurance model and the United States following an out of pocket model however;gross domestic product on healthcare expenditures. There is a current gap in literature on how the United States and Austrian healthcare systems comparatively impact patient outcomes, especially when considering the mediating effects of societal norms such as exercise and mental self-care habits. The information presented could benefit the United States healthcare system if they adopted Austria's model, which expands access, and the Austrian healthcare system regulators could look to American standards of communication and care coordination to improve their healthcare system overall.

摘要

奥地利和美国的医疗体系非常不同,奥地利采用社会保险模式,而美国采用自费模式;然而,在医疗支出方面,国内生产总值存在差距。目前,关于美国和奥地利的医疗体系如何对比影响患者的结果,文献中存在差距,特别是在考虑到社会规范(如运动和精神自我保健习惯)的调解作用时。如果美国采用奥地利的模式(该模式扩大了医疗服务的覆盖范围),那么所提供的信息可能会使美国的医疗体系受益,而奥地利的医疗体系监管机构也可以借鉴美国的沟通和护理协调标准来改善其整体医疗体系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5a1/8058800/2bd5202c8ac3/10.1177_00469580211000162-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5a1/8058800/99b0ee6bc3a8/10.1177_00469580211000162-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5a1/8058800/7a9da6ae6ed9/10.1177_00469580211000162-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5a1/8058800/638d9ecf5707/10.1177_00469580211000162-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5a1/8058800/2bd5202c8ac3/10.1177_00469580211000162-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5a1/8058800/99b0ee6bc3a8/10.1177_00469580211000162-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5a1/8058800/7a9da6ae6ed9/10.1177_00469580211000162-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5a1/8058800/638d9ecf5707/10.1177_00469580211000162-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5a1/8058800/2bd5202c8ac3/10.1177_00469580211000162-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparison of the United States and Austrian Healthcare Needs and Systems.美国与奥地利的医疗保健需求和体系比较。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211000162. doi: 10.1177/00469580211000162.
2
Republic of Austria. Country profile.奥地利共和国。国家概况。
Int Demogr. 1985 Jul;4(7):1-6.
3
Health Literacy in Austria: Interventions and Research.奥地利的健康素养:干预措施与研究
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 25;269:192-201. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200032.
4
The societal costs of chronic pain and its determinants: The case of Austria.慢性疼痛及其决定因素的社会成本:以奥地利为例。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 20;14(3):e0213889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213889. eCollection 2019.
5
Barriers to accessing health care for people with chronic conditions: a qualitative interview study.慢性病患者获得医疗保健的障碍:定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 14;22(1):1037. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08426-z.
6
Out-of-pocket expenditures and the financial burden of healthcare among older adults: by nativity and length of residence in the United States.美国老年人的自付费用及医疗保健经济负担:按出生地和在美国的居住时长划分
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2015;58(2):149-70. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2014.943447. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
7
Austria's path toward nationwide electronic health records.奥地利迈向全国电子健康记录的道路。
Methods Inf Med. 2008;47(2):117-23. doi: 10.3414/me0401.
8
National Initiatives to Improve Healthcare Outcomes: A Comparative Study of Health Delivery Systems in Slovakia and the United States.改善医疗保健成果的国家举措:斯洛伐克与美国医疗服务体系的比较研究
Hosp Top. 2015;93(4):84-91. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2015.1117312.
9
Out-of-pocket expenditures for pharmaceuticals: lessons from the Austrian household budget survey.药品自付费用:来自奥地利家庭预算调查的经验教训。
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 May;18(4):435-447. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0797-y. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
10
Improving the informational continuity of care in diabetes mellitus treatment with a nationwide Shared EHR system: Estimates from Austrian claims data.利用全国共享电子健康记录系统改善糖尿病治疗中的医疗信息连续性:来自奥地利索赔数据的估计
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Aug;92:44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Language and Physician-Patient Racial Concordance on Diabetes Control: An Analysis of Consultations in California Clinics.语言及医患种族匹配度对糖尿病控制的影响:加利福尼亚诊所会诊情况分析
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Aug 15. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02581-9.
2
Health Status and Patients' Satisfaction on the Long Term after Metabolic/Bariatric Surgery.代谢/减重手术后的长期健康状况及患者满意度
Obes Facts. 2025 Apr 15:1-9. doi: 10.1159/000545730.
3
Psychiatric disorders during pregnancy in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive women: Prevalence and effect on outcome.

本文引用的文献

1
Applied Racial/Ethnic Healthcare Disparities Research Using Implicit Measures.运用隐性测量方法的应用种族/族裔医疗保健差异研究
Soc Cogn. 2020 Nov;38(Suppl):s68-s97. doi: 10.1521/soco.2020.38.supp.s68. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
2
Covid-19 - Implications for the Health Care System.新冠疫情——对医疗保健系统的影响
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1483-1488. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2021088. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
3
Disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on immigrant communities in the United States.新冠疫情对美国移民社区的不成比例影响。
妊娠期无症状和轻度症状 SARS-CoV-2 阳性女性的精神障碍:患病率及其对结局的影响。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Aug;326:115313. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115313. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Jul 13;14(7):e0008484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008484. eCollection 2020 Jul.
4
Disease and healthcare burden of COVID-19 in the United States.美国 COVID-19 疾病和医疗负担。
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1212-1217. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0952-y. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
5
Re-examining access points to the different levels of health care: a cross-sectional series in Austria.重新审视进入不同医疗保健层次的途径:奥地利的一项横断面系列研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Dec 1;29(6):1005-1010. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz050.
6
Modeling and forecasting sex differences in mortality: a sex-ratio approach.死亡率性别差异的建模与预测:一种性别比方法。
Genus. 2018;74(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s41118-018-0044-8. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
7
Austria: Health System Review.奥地利:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2018 Aug;20(3):1-254.
8
Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.美国和其他高收入国家的医疗保健支出。
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1150.
9
Health and healthcare disparities among U.S. women and men at the intersection of sexual orientation and race/ethnicity: a nationally representative cross-sectional study.美国男女在性取向与种族/族裔交叉点上的健康与医疗差异:一项具有全国代表性的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 19;17(1):964. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4937-9.
10
Proportion and number of cancer cases and deaths attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors in the United States.美国可改变的潜在风险因素导致的癌症病例和死亡人数及比例。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):31-54. doi: 10.3322/caac.21440. Epub 2017 Nov 21.