Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep 1;49(9):e812-e821. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005036.
To describe rehabilitation practice patterns among critically ill children with prolonged ICU stays and explore the association between institution-level utilization of rehabilitative services and patient outcomes.
Retrospective cohort study using an administrative database of inpatient clinical and resource utilization data from participating pediatric hospitals in the United States. Center-level utilization of physical therapy and occupational therapy among critically ill patients was used to divide hospitals by quartile into high utilization centers or standard utilization centers.
Fifty-one pediatric hospitals in the United States.
Critically ill pediatric patients with prolonged critical illness (defined as an ICU length of stay of at least 7 d) discharged from July 2016 to June 2017.
Not applicable.
Seventeen thousand four hundred seventy encounters met criteria for study inclusion. Of those, 6,040 (35%) were not charged for either physical therapy or occupational therapy services. There was wide variability in center-level utilization of rehabilitative services while in the ICU, ranging from 81% utilization of physical therapy or occupational therapy services among high utilization centers to 46% utilization among centers within the lowest quartile. In univariate analyses, children cared for at an high utilization center were less likely to require discharge to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (1.7% vs 3.5%; p < 0.001) and less likely to incur a new pressure injury (2.2% vs 3.1%; p = 0.001). In multivariable analyses, the direction and magnitude of effects remained similar, although the effect was no longer statistically significant (discharge to inpatient rehabilitation facility: odds ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.18-2.26; pressure injury: odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.48-1.24).
Institutional use of rehabilitative services for children with prolonged critical illness varies greatly in the United States. Further research is needed into the potential benefits for patients cared for at centers with high usage of rehabilitation services in the ICU during prolonged critical illness.
描述 ICU 住院时间延长的危重症儿童的康复实践模式,并探讨机构康复服务利用与患者结局之间的关系。
使用来自美国参与儿科医院的住院临床和资源利用数据的行政数据库进行回顾性队列研究。根据危重症患者物理治疗和职业治疗的中心使用情况,将医院分为高使用率中心或标准使用率中心。
美国 51 家儿科医院。
2016 年 7 月至 2017 年 6 月出院的 ICU 住院时间至少为 7 天的危重症儿科患者。
不适用。
符合研究纳入标准的 17470 次就诊。其中,6040 次(35%)未收取物理治疗或职业治疗服务费用。在 ICU 期间,康复服务的中心使用水平存在很大差异,高使用率中心的物理治疗或职业治疗服务使用率高达 81%,而最低四分位数中心的使用率为 46%。在单变量分析中,在高使用率中心接受治疗的患儿不太可能需要转至住院康复机构(1.7%比 3.5%;p<0.001),也不太可能发生新的压力性损伤(2.2%比 3.1%;p=0.001)。在多变量分析中,尽管效果不再具有统计学意义,但方向和幅度仍然相似(转至住院康复机构:优势比,0.64;95%CI,0.18-2.26;压力性损伤:优势比,0.77;95%CI,0.48-1.24)。
美国危重症儿童长期康复服务的机构使用情况差异很大。需要进一步研究在 ICU 期间接受康复服务使用率高的中心治疗的患者可能获得的益处。