• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓刺激治疗糖尿病性神经痛:个体患者和汇总数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Spinal cord stimulation for the management of painful diabetic neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient and aggregate data.

机构信息

Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Departments of Neurosurgery and.

出版信息

Pain. 2021 Nov 1;162(11):2635-2643. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002262.

DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002262
PMID:33872236
Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been suggested as a treatment option for patients with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). We conducted a systematic review and undertook a meta-analysis on individual patient data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effectiveness of SCS for the management of PDN. Electronic databases were searched from inception to May 2020 for RCTs of SCS for PDN. Searches identified 2 eligible RCTs (total of 93 patients with PDN) and 2 long-term follow-up studies of one of the RCTs. Individual patient data were obtained from the authors of one of these RCTs. Meta-analysis showed significant and clinically meaningful reductions in pain intensity for SCS compared with best medical therapy alone, pooled mean difference (MD) -3.13 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.19 to -2.08) on a 10-point scale at the 6-month follow-up. More patients receiving SCS achieved at least a 50% reduction in pain intensity compared with best medical therapy, pooled risk ratio 0.08 (95% CI: 0.02-0.38). Increases were observed for health-related quality of life assessed as EQ-5D utility score (pooled MD 0.16, 95% CI: 0.02-0.30) and visual analogue scale (pooled MD 11.21, 95% CI: 2.26-20.16). Our findings demonstrate that SCS is an effective therapeutic adjunct to best medical therapy in reducing pain intensity and improving health-related quality of life in patients with PDN. Large well-reported RCTs with long-term follow-up are required to confirm these results.

摘要

脊髓刺激 (SCS) 已被提议作为治疗糖尿病性周围神经痛 (PDN) 患者的一种选择。我们进行了一项系统评价,并对随机对照试验 (RCT) 的个体患者数据进行了荟萃分析,以评估 SCS 治疗 PDN 的效果。从创建到 2020 年 5 月,我们在电子数据库中搜索了用于 PDN 的 SCS 的 RCT。搜索确定了 2 项符合条件的 RCT(总共 93 名 PDN 患者)和其中一项 RCT 的 2 项长期随访研究。一项 RCT 的一位作者提供了个体患者数据。荟萃分析显示,与单独最佳药物治疗相比,SCS 显著且具有临床意义地减轻了疼痛强度,6 个月随访时 10 分制的平均差值为 -3.13(95%置信区间:-4.19 至 -2.08)。与最佳药物治疗相比,接受 SCS 的患者中有更多患者实现了至少 50%的疼痛强度减轻,汇总风险比为 0.08(95%置信区间:0.02-0.38)。健康相关生活质量(通过 EQ-5D 效用评分评估)有所增加(汇总平均差 0.16,95%置信区间:0.02-0.30)和视觉模拟量表(汇总平均差 11.21,95%置信区间:2.26-20.16)。我们的研究结果表明,SCS 是最佳药物治疗的有效辅助治疗方法,可降低 PDN 患者的疼痛强度并改善健康相关生活质量。需要进行大型、报告良好、长期随访的 RCT 来证实这些结果。

相似文献

1
Spinal cord stimulation for the management of painful diabetic neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient and aggregate data.脊髓刺激治疗糖尿病性神经痛:个体患者和汇总数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain. 2021 Nov 1;162(11):2635-2643. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002262.
2
Quality of life increases in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy following treatment with spinal cord stimulation.脊髓刺激治疗后,疼痛性糖尿病神经病变患者的生活质量有所提高。
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jul;25(7):1771-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1211-4. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
3
Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Neurostimulation for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.系统评价和网络荟萃分析神经刺激治疗糖尿病性神经痛。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Oct 1;45(10):2466-2475. doi: 10.2337/dc22-0932.
4
High-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: design of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SENZA-PDN).10 kHz 高频脊髓刺激治疗糖尿病性神经痛:一项多中心、随机对照试验的设计(SENZA-PDN)。
Trials. 2020 Jan 15;21(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4007-y.
5
Invasive Electrical Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.侵入性电神经调节治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变:系统评价与荟萃分析
Neuromodulation. 2021 Jan;24(1):13-21. doi: 10.1111/ner.13216. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
6
Effect of High-frequency (10-kHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.高频(10kHz)脊髓刺激治疗糖尿病性神经痛的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Jun 1;78(6):687-698. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0538.
7
Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Review of Evidence for Spinal Cord Stimulation.脊髓电刺激治疗糖尿病性神经病理性疼痛的神经调节作用:证据回顾。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Mar;16(2):332-340. doi: 10.1177/19322968211060075. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
8
Spinal cord stimulation in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy: a multicentre randomized clinical trial.脊髓刺激治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变患者:一项多中心随机临床试验。
Pain. 2014 Nov;155(11):2426-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.031. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
9
Improved Sensation Resulting From Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: The Possible Role of Stochastic Resonance.脊髓刺激改善疼痛性糖尿病神经病变的感觉:随机共振的可能作用
Pain Physician. 2022 Dec;25(9):E1399-E1403.
10
Spinal cord stimulation in painful diabetic neuropathy: An overview.脊髓刺激治疗糖尿病性神经病理性疼痛:概述。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Dec;206 Suppl 1:110760. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110760.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidimensional advances in neural interface technology for peripheral nerve repair: From material innovation to clinical translation.用于周围神经修复的神经接口技术的多维进展:从材料创新到临床转化。
Mater Today Bio. 2025 Jul 14;34:102092. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102092. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Management: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Emerging Perspectives.慢性疼痛管理中的闭环脊髓刺激:机制、临床证据及新观点
Biomedicines. 2025 Apr 30;13(5):1091. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13051091.
3
Electroacupuncture mitigates cognitive impairments in chronic hypoxia-induced mice by modulating neuroinflammation.
电针通过调节神经炎症减轻慢性缺氧诱导小鼠的认知障碍。
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2025 Mar 9;18:432-442. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2025.03.001. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Durability of Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP)-Controlled, Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in a Real-World European Chronic Pain Population.在欧洲慢性疼痛患者的真实世界中,诱发性复合动作电位(ECAP)控制的闭环脊髓刺激(SCS)的耐用性。
Pain Ther. 2024 Oct;13(5):1119-1136. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00628-z. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
5
Neuromodulation and Habituation: A Literature Review and Conceptional Analysis of Sustaining Therapeutic Efficacy and Mitigating Habituation.神经调节与习惯化:关于维持治疗效果及减轻习惯化的文献综述与概念分析
Biomedicines. 2024 Apr 23;12(5):930. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12050930.
6
Update on Treating Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review of Current US Guidelines with a Focus on the Most Recently Approved Management Options.糖尿病性周围神经病变疼痛治疗的最新进展:对美国现行指南的综述,重点关注最新获批的治疗方案。
J Pain Res. 2024 Mar 13;17:1005-1028. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S442595. eCollection 2024.
7
Neurophysiological outcomes that sustained clinically significant improvements over 3 years of physiologic ECAP-controlled closed-loop spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain.在长达3年的生理性电刺激听觉脑干反应(ECAP)控制的闭环脊髓刺激治疗慢性疼痛过程中,神经生理学结果持续出现具有临床意义的显著改善。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Mar 15. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105370.
8
First Report on Real-World Outcomes with Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP)-Controlled Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Pain.关于诱发性复合动作电位(ECAP)控制的闭环脊髓刺激治疗慢性疼痛的真实世界结果的首次报告。
Pain Ther. 2023 Oct;12(5):1221-1233. doi: 10.1007/s40122-023-00540-y. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
9
What should be the entry pain intensity criteria for chronic pain clinical trials? An IMMPACT update.慢性疼痛临床试验的入组疼痛强度标准应该是什么?IMMPACT更新内容。
Pain. 2023 Sep 1;164(9):1927-1930. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002930. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
10
Painful Peripheral Neuropathies of the Lower Limbs and/or Lower Extremities Treated with Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis.脊髓刺激治疗下肢和/或下肢疼痛性周围神经病变:一项叙述性综合系统评价
J Pain Res. 2023 May 18;16:1607-1636. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S403715. eCollection 2023.