Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Departments of Neurosurgery and.
Pain. 2021 Nov 1;162(11):2635-2643. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002262.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been suggested as a treatment option for patients with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). We conducted a systematic review and undertook a meta-analysis on individual patient data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effectiveness of SCS for the management of PDN. Electronic databases were searched from inception to May 2020 for RCTs of SCS for PDN. Searches identified 2 eligible RCTs (total of 93 patients with PDN) and 2 long-term follow-up studies of one of the RCTs. Individual patient data were obtained from the authors of one of these RCTs. Meta-analysis showed significant and clinically meaningful reductions in pain intensity for SCS compared with best medical therapy alone, pooled mean difference (MD) -3.13 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.19 to -2.08) on a 10-point scale at the 6-month follow-up. More patients receiving SCS achieved at least a 50% reduction in pain intensity compared with best medical therapy, pooled risk ratio 0.08 (95% CI: 0.02-0.38). Increases were observed for health-related quality of life assessed as EQ-5D utility score (pooled MD 0.16, 95% CI: 0.02-0.30) and visual analogue scale (pooled MD 11.21, 95% CI: 2.26-20.16). Our findings demonstrate that SCS is an effective therapeutic adjunct to best medical therapy in reducing pain intensity and improving health-related quality of life in patients with PDN. Large well-reported RCTs with long-term follow-up are required to confirm these results.
脊髓刺激 (SCS) 已被提议作为治疗糖尿病性周围神经痛 (PDN) 患者的一种选择。我们进行了一项系统评价,并对随机对照试验 (RCT) 的个体患者数据进行了荟萃分析,以评估 SCS 治疗 PDN 的效果。从创建到 2020 年 5 月,我们在电子数据库中搜索了用于 PDN 的 SCS 的 RCT。搜索确定了 2 项符合条件的 RCT(总共 93 名 PDN 患者)和其中一项 RCT 的 2 项长期随访研究。一项 RCT 的一位作者提供了个体患者数据。荟萃分析显示,与单独最佳药物治疗相比,SCS 显著且具有临床意义地减轻了疼痛强度,6 个月随访时 10 分制的平均差值为 -3.13(95%置信区间:-4.19 至 -2.08)。与最佳药物治疗相比,接受 SCS 的患者中有更多患者实现了至少 50%的疼痛强度减轻,汇总风险比为 0.08(95%置信区间:0.02-0.38)。健康相关生活质量(通过 EQ-5D 效用评分评估)有所增加(汇总平均差 0.16,95%置信区间:0.02-0.30)和视觉模拟量表(汇总平均差 11.21,95%置信区间:2.26-20.16)。我们的研究结果表明,SCS 是最佳药物治疗的有效辅助治疗方法,可降低 PDN 患者的疼痛强度并改善健康相关生活质量。需要进行大型、报告良好、长期随访的 RCT 来证实这些结果。