Water Technology Center CETaqua, Carretera d'Esplugues 75, E-08940, Cornellà de Llobregat, Spain.
Chemical Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya UPC·BarcelonaTECH, C/ Eduard Maristany, 10-14 (Campus Diagonal-Besòs), E-08930 Barcelona, Spain; Barcelona Multi Scale Science and Engineering Research Center, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya UPC·BarcelonaTECH, C/ Eduard Maristany, 10-14 (Campus Diagonal-Besòs), E-08930 Barcelona, Spain.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jul 1;289:112549. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112549. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
Management of in-land reverse osmosis (RO) desalination brines generated from surface brackish waters is a current challenge. Among the different near-Zero and Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) alternatives, Membrane Distillation (MD), in which the transport of water is thermally driven, appears as an attractive technology if a residual heat source is available. The aim of this study was to identify the limits of Direct Contact MD (DCMD) pre-treatments such as acidification and aeration, or the combination of both to quantify the scaling reduction potential when treating a RO brine from surface brackish water. Experimental data were used to evaluate the effectiveness of DCMD to achieve the highest concentration factors, depending on the chosen pre-treatment. Additionally, an economic analysis of the operational cost, taking as case study a site where the current management of the brine is the discharge to the sea, was also carried out. Results showed that pre-treatments enhanced MD performance by increasing the concentration factor achieved and highest volume reductions (about 3 times) were reached with the combination of acidification and aeration pre-treatments. Both processes reduced the precipitation potential of CaCO(s) by reducing the total inorganic carbon (>90%); however, CaSO·2HO(s) precipitated. Results also indicated that even if a waste heat source is available, brine disposal into the sea is the cheapest option, while ZLD alternatives were not attractive in the current regulatory framework since their cost was higher than the discharge to the sea. Other options related to the Minimal Liquid Discharge may be more economically attractive.
内陆反渗透(RO)海水淡化厂浓盐水的处理是当前的一个挑战。在各种近零排放和零排放(ZLD)替代方案中,膜蒸馏(MD)作为一种有吸引力的技术,如果有残余热源,则水的输送是热驱动的。本研究的目的是确定直接接触膜蒸馏(DCMD)预处理的限制,例如酸化和曝气,或两者的组合,以量化处理地表水海水淡化厂 RO 浓盐水时的结垢减少潜力。实验数据用于评估 DCMD 实现最高浓缩因子的有效性,具体取决于所选的预处理方法。此外,还对运营成本进行了经济分析,以一个将浓盐水排放到海洋的现有管理站点为例。结果表明,预处理通过提高达到的浓缩因子和最高体积减少(约 3 倍)来增强 MD 性能,酸化和曝气预处理的组合效果最佳。这两种方法都降低了 CaCO3(s)的沉淀潜力,降低了总无机碳(>90%);然而,CaSO4·2H2O(s)沉淀。结果还表明,即使有废热源可用,将浓盐水排放到海洋也是最便宜的选择,而 ZLD 替代方案在当前监管框架下没有吸引力,因为它们的成本高于排放到海洋。与最小液体排放相关的其他选择可能在经济上更具吸引力。