• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门冬胰岛素(速秀霖®)与美敦力 670G 混合闭环系统联合使用,在模拟试验中与诺和锐®相比,可改善血糖控制结果。

Fast-acting insulin aspart (Fiasp®) improves glycemic outcomes when used with MiniMed 670G hybrid closed-loop system in simulated trials compared to NovoLog®.

机构信息

Medtronic Diabetes, United States.

Medtronic Diabetes, United States.

出版信息

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Jun;205:106087. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106087. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106087
PMID:33873075
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Medtronic has developed a virtual patient simulator for modeling and predicting insulin therapy outcomes for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). An enhanced simulator was created to estimate outcomes when using the MiniMed 670G system with standard NovoLog® (EU: NovoRapid, US: NovoLog) versus Fiasp ® by using clinical data.

METHODS

Sixty-seven participants' PK profiles were generated per type of insulin (Total of 134 PK profiles). 7,485 virtual patients' PK measurements was matched with one of the 67 NovoLog® PK Tmax values. These 7,485 virtual patients were then simulated using the Medtronic MiniMed™ 670G algorithm following an in-silico protocol of 90 days: 14 days in open loop (Manual Mode) followed by 76 days in closed loop (Auto Mode). Simulation study was repeated with each NovoLog® PK profile being replaced by its corresponding Fiasp® PK profile in the same virtual patient. To validate our in-silico analysis, we compared the results of "actual" 19 "real life" patients from a clinical study RESULTS: Simulated overall and postprandial glycemic outcomes improved in all age groups with Fiasp®. The percentage of time in the euglycemic range increased by about ~2.2% with Fiasp®, in all age groups (p < 0.01). The percentage of time spent at <70 mg/dL was reduced by about ~0.6% with insulin Fiasp® (p < 0.01) and the mean glucose was reduced by about 1.3 mg/dL (p < 0.01), excluding those age <7 years. The simulated mean postprandial SG was reduced by ~5 mg/dL, a significant difference for all age groups. A clinical study results showed similar improvements with MiniMed 670G system when switching from NovoLog® to Fiasp®.

CONCLUSIONS

The simulation studies indicate that using Fiasp® in place of NovoLog® with the MiniMed 670G system will significantly improve the time spent in the healthy, euglycemic range and reduce exposure to hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in most patients.

摘要

简介

美敦力为 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者的胰岛素治疗结果建模和预测开发了一种虚拟患者模拟器。使用临床数据创建了一个增强型模拟器,以估计使用美敦力 MiniMed 670G 系统与标准诺和锐(欧盟:诺和锐速,美国:诺和锐)时的结果。

方法

为每种胰岛素生成 67 名参与者的 PK 曲线(共 134 条 PK 曲线)。7485 名虚拟患者的 PK 测量值与诺和锐®Tmax 值中的 67 个值之一相匹配。然后,使用美敦力 MiniMed™670G 算法对这 7485 名虚拟患者进行模拟,遵循 90 天的模拟方案:14 天开环(手动模式),随后 76 天闭环(自动模式)。使用相同的虚拟患者,用每种诺和锐®PK 曲线替换其相应的法地特®PK 曲线,重复模拟研究。为了验证我们的计算机分析,我们将临床研究中“实际”的 19 名“真实生活”患者的结果与模拟结果进行了比较。

结果

法地特®可改善所有年龄段患者的总体和餐后血糖结果。所有年龄段患者的血糖控制达标时间(euglycemic range)增加了约 2.2%(p<0.01)。使用胰岛素法地特®,血糖<70mg/dL 的时间减少了约 0.6%(p<0.01),并且平均血糖降低了约 1.3mg/dL(p<0.01),不包括年龄<7 岁的患者。模拟餐后平均血糖降低了约 5mg/dL,这对所有年龄段都是显著差异。一项临床研究结果表明,当从诺和锐®切换到法地特®时,MiniMed 670G 系统的临床结果也有类似的改善。

结论

模拟研究表明,在 MiniMed 670G 系统中使用法地特®代替诺和锐®将显著改善大多数患者的健康、血糖控制达标时间,并减少高血糖和低血糖暴露。

相似文献

1
Fast-acting insulin aspart (Fiasp®) improves glycemic outcomes when used with MiniMed 670G hybrid closed-loop system in simulated trials compared to NovoLog®.门冬胰岛素(速秀霖®)与美敦力 670G 混合闭环系统联合使用,在模拟试验中与诺和锐®相比,可改善血糖控制结果。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Jun;205:106087. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106087. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
2
Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Use with the MiniMed 670G System.速效门冬胰岛素与美敦力 670G 系统联合使用。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Jan;23(1):1-7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0083.
3
Fast Acting Insulin Aspart Compared with Insulin Aspart in the Medtronic 670G Hybrid Closed Loop System in Type 1 Diabetes: An Open Label Crossover Study.门冬胰岛素类似物与赖脯胰岛素类似物在 1 型糖尿病美敦力 670G 混合闭环系统中的比较:一项开放标签交叉研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Apr;23(4):286-292. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0500. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Safety, metabolic and psychological outcomes of Medtronic MiniMed 670G in children, adolescents and young adults: a systematic review.美敦力 MiniMed 670G 在儿童、青少年和年轻成年人中的安全性、代谢和心理结局:系统评价。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 May;182(5):1949-1963. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04833-4. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
5
Retrospective Analysis of 3-Month Real-World Glucose Data After the MiniMed 670G System Commercial Launch.美敦力 670G 系统商业上市后 3 个月真实世界血糖数据的回顾性分析。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Oct;20(10):689-692. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0202. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
6
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the MiniMed 670G Hybrid Closed-Loop System Versus Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion for Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes.美敦力 670G 混合闭环系统与持续皮下胰岛素输注治疗 1 型糖尿病的成本效益分析。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Mar;21(3):110-118. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0328. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
7
Hybrid closed-loop glucose control with faster insulin aspart compared with standard insulin aspart in adults with type 1 diabetes: A double-blind, multicentre, multinational, randomized, crossover study.与标准胰岛素类似物相比,门冬胰岛素更快的混合闭环血糖控制在 1 型糖尿病成人患者中的疗效:一项双盲、多中心、跨国、随机、交叉研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Jun;23(6):1389-1396. doi: 10.1111/dom.14355. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
8
A Comparison of Postprandial Glucose Control in the Medtronic Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System Versus 670G.美敦力先进混合闭环系统与 670G 的餐后血糖控制比较。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Aug;24(8):573-582. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0568. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
9
Maximizing Glycemic Benefits of Using Faster Insulin Formulations in Type 1 Diabetes: In Silico Analysis Under Open- and Closed-Loop Conditions.在 1 型糖尿病中使用速效胰岛素制剂以最大化血糖获益:开环和闭环条件下的模拟分析。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Apr;25(4):219-230. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0468. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
10
A fully artificial pancreas versus a hybrid artificial pancreas for type 1 diabetes: a single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled, crossover, non-inferiority trial.全人工胰腺与混合人工胰腺治疗 1 型糖尿病的比较:一项单中心、开放标签、随机对照、交叉、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Nov;3(11):e723-e732. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00139-4. Epub 2021 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Research Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities in Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.自动胰岛素输送系统的研究空白、挑战与机遇
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jul;19(4):937-949. doi: 10.1177/19322968251338754. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
2
Advances in Oral Biomacromolecule Therapies for Metabolic Diseases.代谢性疾病口腔生物大分子疗法的进展
Pharmaceutics. 2025 Feb 12;17(2):238. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17020238.
3
The Evolution of Insulin Administration in Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病胰岛素给药的演变
J Diabetes Mellitus. 2021 Nov;11(5):249-277. doi: 10.4236/jdm.2021.115021. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
4
Performance of Fast-Acting Aspart Insulin as Compared to Aspart Insulin in Insulin Pump for Managing Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis.速效门冬胰岛素与门冬胰岛素在胰岛素泵治疗 1 型糖尿病中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Diabetes Metab J. 2023 Jan;47(1):72-81. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2022.0035. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
5
Current Advances of Artificial Pancreas Systems: A Comprehensive Review of the Clinical Evidence.人工胰腺系统的最新进展:临床证据的综合评价。
Diabetes Metab J. 2021 Nov;45(6):813-839. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0177. Epub 2021 Nov 22.