Juan J, Yang H X, Wei Y M, Song G, Su R N, Chen X, Yang Q H, Yan J Y, Xiao M, Li Y, Cui S H, Hu Y L, Zhao X L, Fan S R, Feng L, Zhang M H, Ma Y Y, You Z S, Meng H X, Liu H W, Zhu Y, Wu C F, Cai Y, Hu K J, Ding H J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Department of Obstetrics, Tianjin Central Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 25;56(3):161-170. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20201010-00767.
To explore the effects of interpregnancy interval (IPI) on pregnancy outcomes of subsequent pregnancy. A multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 21 hospitals in China. Information of age, height, pre-pregnancy weight, IPI, history of diseases, complications of pregnancy, gestational age of delivery, delivery mode, and pregnancy outcomes of the participants were collected by consulting medical records of pregnant women who had two consecutive deliveries in the same hospital during 2011 to 2018. The participants were divided into 4 groups according to IPI:<18 months, 18-23 months, 24-59 months and ≥60 months. According to the WHO's recommendation, with the IPI of 24-59 months group as a reference, to the effects of IPI on pregnancy outcomes of subsequent pregnancy were analyzed. Stratified analysis was further carried out based on age, history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), macrosomia, and premature delivery, to explore the differences in the effects of IPI on pregnancy outcomes among women with different characteristics. A total of 8 026 women were included in this study. There were 423, 623, 5 512 and 1 468 participants in <18 months group, 18-23 months group, 24-59 months group and ≥60 months group, respectively. (1) The age, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), history of cesarean section, GDM, gestational hypertension and cesarean section delivery rate of <18 months group, 18-23 months group, 24-59 months group and ≥60 months group were gradually increased, and the differences were statistically significant (<0.05). (2) After adjusting for potential confounding factors, compared with women in the IPI of 24-59 months group, the risk of premature delivery, premature rupture of membranes, and oligohydramnios were increased by 42% (=1.42, 95%: 1.07-1.88, =0.015), 46% (=1.46, 95%: 1.13-1.88, =0.004), and 64% (=1.64, 95%: 1.13-2.38, =0.009) respectively for women in the IPI≥60 months group. No effects of IPI on other pregnancy outcomes were found in this study (>0.05). (3) After stratified by age and adjusted for confounding factors, compared with women in the IPI of 24-59 months group, IPI≥60 months would significantly increase the risk of oligohydramnios for women with advanced age (=2.87, 95%: 1.41-5.83, =0.004); and <18 months could increase the risk of premature rupture of membranes for women under the age of 35 (=1.59, 95%: 1.04-2.43, =0.032). Both the risk of premature rupture of membranes (=1.58, 95%: 1.18-2.13, =0.002) and premature delivery (=1.52, 95%: 1.07-2.17, =0.020) were significantly increased in the IPI≥60 months group. After stratified by history of GDM and adjusted for confounding factors, compared with women in the IPI of 24-59 months group, IPI≥60 months would lead to an increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage for women with a history of GDM (=5.34, 95%: 1.45-19.70, =0.012) and an increased risk of premature rupture of membranes for women without a history of GDM (=1.44, 95%: 1.10-1.90, =0.009). After stratified by history of macrosomia and adjusted for confounding factors, compared with women in the IPI of 24-59 months group, IPI≥60 months could increase the proportion of cesarean section for women with a history of macrosomia (=4.11, 95%: 1.18-14.27, =0.026) and the risk of premature rupture of membranes for women without a history of macrosomia (=1.46, 95%: 1.12-1.89, =0.005). After stratified by history of premature delivery and adjusted for confounding factors, compared with women in the IPI of 24-59 months group, IPI≥60 months would significantly increase the risk of premature rupture of membranes for women without a history of premature delivery (=1.47, 95%: 1.13-1.92, =0.004). Both IPI≥60 months and <18 months would increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy. Healthcare education and consultation should be conducted for women of reproductive age to maintain an appropriate IPI when they plan to pregnant again, to reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy.
探讨妊娠间隔(IPI)对后续妊娠结局的影响。在中国21家医院进行了一项多中心回顾性研究。通过查阅2011年至2018年期间在同一家医院连续分娩两次的孕妇病历,收集参与者的年龄、身高、孕前体重、IPI、疾病史、妊娠并发症、分娩孕周、分娩方式和妊娠结局等信息。根据IPI将参与者分为4组:<18个月、18 - 23个月、24 - 59个月和≥60个月。以WHO推荐的IPI为24 - 59个月组作为参照,分析IPI对后续妊娠结局的影响。并根据年龄、妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)史、巨大儿和早产史进行进一步分层分析,以探讨IPI对不同特征女性妊娠结局影响的差异。本研究共纳入8026名女性。<18个月组、18 - 23个月组、24 - 59个月组和≥60个月组的参与者分别有423名、623名、5512名和1468名。(1)<18个月组、18 - 23个月组、24 - 59个月组和≥60个月组的年龄、孕前体重指数(BMI)、剖宫产史、GDM、妊娠期高血压和剖宫产分娩率逐渐升高,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。(2)在调整潜在混杂因素后,与IPI为24 - 59个月组的女性相比,IPI≥60个月组的女性早产、胎膜早破和羊水过少的风险分别增加了42%(=1.42,95%:1.07 - 1.88,=0.015)、46%(=1.46,95%:1.13 - 1.88,=0.004)和64%(=1.64,95%:1.13 - 2.38,=0.009)。本研究未发现IPI对其他妊娠结局有影响(>0.05)。(3)按年龄分层并调整混杂因素后,与IPI为24 - 59个月组的女性相比,IPI≥60个月会显著增加高龄女性羊水过少的风险(=2.87,95%:1.41 - 5.83,=0.004);<18个月会增加35岁以下女性胎膜早破的风险(=1.59,95%:1.04 - 2.43,=0.032)。IPI≥60个月组胎膜早破(=1.58,95%:1.18 - 2.13,=0.002)和早产(=1.52,95%:1.07 - 2.17,=0.020)的风险均显著增加。按GDM史分层并调整混杂因素后,与IPI为24 - 59个月组的女性相比,IPI≥60个月会使有GDM史的女性产后出血风险增加(=5.34,95%:1.45 - 19.70,=0.012),使无GDM史的女性胎膜早破风险增加(=1.44,95%:1.10 - 1.90,=0.009)。按巨大儿史分层并调整混杂因素后,与IPI为24 - 59个月组的女性相比,IPI≥60个月会增加有巨大儿史女性的剖宫产比例(=4.11,95%:1.18 - 14.27,=0.026),增加无巨大儿史女性胎膜早破的风险(=1.46,95%:1.12 - 1.89,=0.005)。按早产史分层并调整混杂因素后,与IPI为24 - 59个月组的女性相比,IPI≥60个月会显著增加无早产史女性胎膜早破的风险(=1.47,95%:1.13 - 1.92,=0.004)。IPI≥60个月和<18个月都会增加后续妊娠不良妊娠结局的风险。应对育龄期女性进行健康教育和咨询,使其在计划再次怀孕时保持适当的IPI,以降低后续妊娠不良妊娠结局风险。