• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨肝胰胆专科住院医师培训项目选择中的相关因素:信念与现实。

Investigating Factors at Play in Hepatopancreatobiliary Fellowship Selection: Beliefs versus Reality.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Methodist Richardson Medical Center, 2805 E President George Bush Hwy, Richardson, TX, 75082, USA.

Department of Surgery, Medical City Healthcare, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2021 Aug;45(8):2556-2566. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06108-1. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-021-06108-1
PMID:33876267
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Selection biases affecting candidate matches to fellowship programs directly influence diversity within the surgical community. The review of selection bias has never been distinctively investigated in the Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery community. This study seeks to (i) evaluate factors affecting selection of candidates to HPB fellowships, (ii) examine explicit biases among program directors and faculty of HPB programs in North America, and (iii) compare the demography of the HPB faculty and recently graduated fellows to general surgery residents.

STUDY DESIGN

An anonymous, self-reported survey consisting of 10 sets of fictional applications was distributed to 52 faculty members, including program directors, of AHPBA-affiliated HPB fellowships in North America. The respondents had to pick a preferred candidate between two abridged, fictional HPB fellow applications and give an open-ended response as to why they picked that candidate. The applications were nearly identical with one notable characteristic of interest. Demographic information of both faculty and their recent fellows was also collected. This survey was administered and collected between February and April, 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 29 fully completed responses were received, comprising a 55.7% response rate. Respondents were 72.4% male, 69.0% Caucasian, and 79.3% held US medical degrees (MD). 50.0% of respondents preferred an MD candidate to a DO candidate, and 37% preferred US graduates to foreign-trained candidates. The respondents were unanimous in stating that gender, race, and family status were not a factor in their selection process. 5.0% said they would support an LGBTQ candidate when faced with otherwise similar applicants. Seventy-six HPB fellows from the past 5 years were 76.3% male, 56.6% Caucasian, and 51.3% US graduated Doctor of Medicine (US MD).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study explicitly exploring the impact of demographic factors in the HPB fellowship selection process. The respondents unanimously and explicitly stated that race and gender do not play any role in their selection process. Yet, there is stark discordance between general surgery resident demographics and HPB fellow demographics. A greater effort to promote a more diverse HPB surgery community may be needed.

摘要

背景

影响 fellowship项目候选人匹配的选择偏差直接影响外科领域的多样性。在肝胆胰外科学(HPB)领域,从未对选择偏差进行过专门的审查。本研究旨在:(i)评估影响 HPB 奖学金候选人选择的因素;(ii)检查北美 HPB 项目主任和教师中的明确偏见;(iii)将 HPB 教师和最近毕业的研究员与普通外科住院医师的人口统计学进行比较。

研究设计

向北美 AHPBA 附属 HPB 奖学金的 52 名教师成员(包括项目主任)分发了一份匿名、自我报告的调查,该调查由 10 组虚构的申请组成。受访者必须在两名简化的虚构 HPB 研究员申请中选择一名首选候选人,并对他们选择该候选人的原因给出开放式回答。这些申请几乎完全相同,只有一个引人关注的特征。还收集了教师和他们最近的研究员的人口统计学信息。这项调查于 2020 年 2 月至 4 月进行和收集。

结果

共收到 29 份完整回复,回复率为 55.7%。受访者中 72.4%为男性,69.0%为白种人,79.3%拥有美国医学学位(MD)。50.0%的受访者更喜欢 MD 候选人而不是 DO 候选人,37%更喜欢美国毕业生而不是外国培训的候选人。受访者一致表示,性别、种族和家庭状况不是他们选择过程中的一个因素。5.0%的受访者表示,在面对其他方面相似的申请人时,他们会支持 LGBTQ 候选人。过去 5 年的 76 名 HPB 研究员中,男性占 76.3%,白种人占 56.6%,美国毕业的医学博士(US MD)占 51.3%。

结论

这是第一项明确探讨 HPB 奖学金选择过程中人口统计学因素影响的研究。受访者一致明确表示,种族和性别在他们的选择过程中不起作用。然而,普通外科住院医师的人口统计学和 HPB 研究员的人口统计学之间存在明显的不协调。可能需要加大努力,促进更具多样性的 HPB 外科学术界。

相似文献

1
Investigating Factors at Play in Hepatopancreatobiliary Fellowship Selection: Beliefs versus Reality.探讨肝胰胆专科住院医师培训项目选择中的相关因素:信念与现实。
World J Surg. 2021 Aug;45(8):2556-2566. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06108-1. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
2
Checking Our Blind Spots: Examining Characteristics of Interviewees Versus Matriculants to a Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Fellowship Program.检查我们的盲点:检查肝胰胆外科住院医师培训项目面试者和入学申请者的特征。
J Surg Educ. 2023 Nov;80(11):1582-1591. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 May 12.
3
Qualities and characteristics of successfully matched North American HPB surgery fellowship candidates.成功匹配北美肝脏胰腺胆管(HPB)外科 fellowship 候选人的品质和特征。
HPB (Oxford). 2016 May;18(5):479-84. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
4
Hepatopancreatobiliary Fellowship Graduates: Where Do They Stand today?肝胆胰外科研修生:他们今天的地位如何?
Am Surg. 2022 Jun;88(6):1250-1255. doi: 10.1177/0003134821995066. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
5
Perception of training in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery among general surgery residents in the Americas.美洲普通外科住院医师对肝胆胰外科培训的认知
HPB (Oxford). 2016 Dec;18(12):1039-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
6
Are general surgery residents adequately prepared for hepatopancreatobiliary fellowships? A questionnaire-based study.普通外科住院医师对肝胆胰专科 fellowship 培训准备充分吗?一项基于问卷调查的研究。
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Mar;17(3):265-71. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12353. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
7
The current state of hepatopancreatobiliary fellowship experience in North America.北美肝胰胆专科医师培训经历的现状
J Surg Educ. 2015 Jan-Feb;72(1):144-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
8
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Compliance and Resident Competence in Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery during General Surgery Residency: A Program Director Review.毕业后医学教育认证委员会对普通外科住院医师培训期间肝胆胰外科的合规性及住院医师能力的审查:项目主任综述
J Surg Educ. 2015 Sep-Oct;72(5):818-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 May 14.
9
Training and practice of the next generation HPB surgeon: analysis of the 2014 AHPBA residents' and fellows' symposium survey.下一代肝胰胆外科医生的培训与实践:2014年美国肝胰胆协会住院医师及研究员研讨会调查分析
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Dec;17(12):1096-104. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12498. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
10
Finding the Balance: General Surgery Resident Versus Fellow Training and Exposure in Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery.寻求平衡:普通外科住院医师与肝胆胰外科专科培训及接触机会
J Surg Educ. 2021 May-Jun;78(3):875-884. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Importance of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Hepatopancreatobiliary Workforce.多样性、公平性和包容性在肝胰胆领域劳动力中的重要性。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 11;16(2):326. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020326.
2
Confronting the Scope of LGBT Inequity in Surgery.直面外科领域中的 LGBT 不平等问题。
J Am Coll Surg. 2022 May 1;234(5):959-963. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000101.

本文引用的文献

1
Bias in Radiology Resident Selection: Do We Discriminate Against the Obese and Unattractive?放射科住院医师选拔中的偏见:我们是否歧视肥胖和不吸引人的人?
Acad Med. 2019 Nov;94(11):1774-1780. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002813.
2
Declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine: A longitudinal study of 16 US medical specialties.临床学术医学中代表性不断下降的种族和民族:对 16 个美国医学专业的纵向研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 16;13(11):e0207274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207274. eCollection 2018.