Suppr超能文献

EHRA/HRS/APHRS/LAHRS 专家共识:在心律失常风险评估中使用合适的工具以获得合适的结果——要点和评论。

Highlights and comments on EHRA/HRS/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus on risk assessment in cardiac arrhythmias: use the right tool for the right outcome.

机构信息

Cardiology, Electrophysiology Service, University of Campinas (UNICAMP) Hospital, Campinas, Brazil.

Department of Electrophysiology and Hemodynamic, Arrhytmias Unity, CMN 20 de Noviembre, ISSSTE, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Dec;62(3):461-467. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-00996-y. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

Abstract

Patients with heart disease, or at high risk of developing a cardiac condition, usually undergo risk assessment by primary care physicians, internal medicine doctors, or cardiologists. There are several methods that can be used for this risk assessment, and their applicability differs with respect to availability, complexity, and usefulness in different geographic populations. This document focuses on some of the many relevant clinical topics recently presented in the "Expert Consensus on Risk Assessment in Cardiac Arrhythmias: Use the Right Tool for the Right Outcome," which include statements based on the best available evidence. In this review, we want to highlight and make some pertinent comments on some of the most relevant points of this Consensus.

摘要

心脏病患者或有发生心脏疾病风险的患者通常会接受初级保健医生、内科医生或心脏病专家进行风险评估。有几种方法可用于这种风险评估,其适用性因可用性、复杂性以及在不同地理人群中的有用性而异。本文主要关注最近在“心律失常风险评估的专家共识:使用正确的工具获得正确的结果”中提出的许多相关临床主题,包括基于现有最佳证据的声明。在这篇综述中,我们希望强调并对该共识中一些最相关的要点提出一些相关意见。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验