• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk factors of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among hospital employees in Italy: a single-centre study.意大利医院员工中 SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性率的风险因素:一项单中心研究。
Intern Med J. 2021 Jul;51(7):1049-1059. doi: 10.1111/imj.15201. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
2
Half-Year Longitudinal Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-Antibodies and Rule Compliance in German Hospital Employees.德国医院员工中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的半年纵向血清流行率和规则遵守情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 19;18(20):10972. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010972.
3
SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and asymptomatic viral carriage in healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study.SARS-CoV-2 血清流行率和医护人员无症状病毒携带情况:一项横断面研究。
Thorax. 2020 Dec;75(12):1089-1094. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215414. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
4
Higher rate of SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity in hospital-based healthcare workers compared to elderly care staff in a Swedish low-prevalence region: a cross-sectional study.在瑞典低流行地区,与老年护理人员相比,医院医护人员的 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 血清阳性率更高:一项横断面研究。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2021 Nov-Dec;53(12):920-929. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2021.1959949. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
5
Seroprevalence study of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in healthcare workers following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary-level hospital in the south of Ireland.爱尔兰南部一家三级医院在 COVID-19 大流行第一波后医护人员中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的血清阳性率研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 8;11(6):e051415. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051415.
6
Seroprevalence in health care workers during the later phase of the second wave: Results of three hospitals in Serbia, prior to vaccine administration.在疫苗接种前,塞尔维亚三家医院在第二波疫情后期对医护人员的血清阳性率调查结果。
J Infect Public Health. 2022 Jul;15(7):739-745. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 May 25.
7
Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG among healthcare workers of a large university hospital in Milan, Lombardy, Italy: a cross-sectional study.意大利伦巴第大区米兰一家大型大学医院医护人员中抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 的血清流行率:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 22;11(2):e047216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047216.
8
[SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among workers in a hospital in Madrid.].[马德里一家医院工作人员中新型冠状病毒2型血清流行率]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2021 Oct 22;95:e202110176.
9
SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in health care workers from 10 hospitals in Quebec, Canada: a cross-sectional study.加拿大魁北克省 10 家医院医护人员中 SARS-CoV-2 血清流行率:一项横断面研究。
CMAJ. 2021 Dec 13;193(49):E1868-E1877. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.202783.
10
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Seroprevalence Survey Among 17 971 Healthcare and Administrative Personnel at Hospitals, Prehospital Services, and Specialist Practitioners in the Central Denmark Region.丹麦中部地区 17971 名医院、院前服务和专科医生医护及行政人员中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 血清流行率调查。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e2853-e2860. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1471.

引用本文的文献

1
SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence among healthcare workers: A cross-sectional study at a quaternary healthcare center in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一家四级保健中心的医护人员中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体阳性率:一项横断面研究。
J Infect Public Health. 2022 Mar;15(3):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in an area of northeastern Italy with a high incidence of COVID-19 cases: a population-based study.意大利东北部一个 COVID-19 病例高发地区 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 抗体的流行情况:一项基于人群的研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Apr;27(4):633.e1-633.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.013. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
2
Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: A living systematic review and meta-analysis.无症状和出现症状前 SARS-CoV-2 感染的发生和传播潜力:一项实时系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 22;17(9):e1003346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003346. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Prevalence of Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in Italian Adults and Associated Risk Factors.意大利成年人中抗SARS-CoV-2抗体的流行率及相关风险因素
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 27;9(9):2780. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092780.
4
Estimation of SARS-CoV-2 mortality during the early stages of an epidemic: A modeling study in Hubei, China, and six regions in Europe.估算疫情早期 SARS-CoV-2 的死亡率:在中国湖北和欧洲六个地区的建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 28;17(7):e1003189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003189. eCollection 2020 Jul.
5
The incidence of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 among asymptomatic patients: A systematic review.无症状患者中新发冠状病毒 SARS-CoV-2 的发病率:一项系统综述。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;98:372-380. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.098. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
6
Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies up to 25 April 2020 and public health implications.截至 2020 年 4 月 25 日的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体血清学检测诊断性能的荟萃分析及公共卫生意义。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jun;25(23). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.23.2000980.
7
Point-of-Care Diagnostic Tests for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Data.用于检测新型冠状病毒2型抗体的即时诊断测试:基于真实世界数据的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2020 May 18;9(5):1515. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051515.
8
Comparing hospitalised, community and staff COVID-19 infection rates during the early phase of the evolving COVID-19 epidemic.比较新冠疫情演变早期住院患者、社区居民及工作人员的新冠病毒感染率。
J Infect. 2020 Oct;81(4):647-679. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.029. Epub 2020 May 19.
9
Environmental contamination by SARS-CoV-2 in a designated hospital for coronavirus disease 2019.新冠病毒 2019 年指定冠状病毒病医院的环境污染。
Am J Infect Control. 2020 Aug;48(8):910-914. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.05.003. Epub 2020 May 12.
10
Symptom Criteria for COVID-19 Testing of Heath Care Workers.医护人员 COVID-19 检测的症状标准。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;27(6):469-474. doi: 10.1111/acem.14009. Epub 2020 Jun 8.

意大利医院员工中 SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性率的风险因素:一项单中心研究。

Risk factors of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among hospital employees in Italy: a single-centre study.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Unit, AO Ordine Mauriziano, Turin, Italy.

Laboratory Medicine, AO Ordine Mauriziano, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2021 Jul;51(7):1049-1059. doi: 10.1111/imj.15201. Epub 2021 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1111/imj.15201
PMID:33876536
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8251056/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak early in 2020 overwhelmed the Italian national health system, and hospitals were considered places at high risk of spreading the infection. We explored specific antibody seroprevalence of all employees at a single hospital in the epicentre of the outbreak, to identify areas of risk in nosocomial setting and to evaluate the usefulness of antibody testing.

AIMS

Aim of this study was to explore SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in a single hospital workers cohort.

METHODS

All hospital workers were invited to fill in a questionnaire and undergo a blood test for SARS-CoV-2 IgG, using two commercial tests (DiaSorin and Abbott). Seropositivity was determined overall and according to demographic and occupations characteristics, for both tests singly and combined.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 1562 hospital workers (95% of the eligible population). Overall, 153 (9.8%) participants were positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG on DiaSorin test, and 150 (9.6%) were positive on Abbott test; both tests were positive in 123 (7.9%) cases and at least one was positive in 180 (11.5%) cases. Factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity included: being a smoker, working in emergency or medicine departments, being a healthcare practitioner, self-reporting a relative with COVID-19 or symptoms suggestive of COVID-19, and having undergone a nasopharyngeal swab test. The tests were accurate in discriminating infected cases, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.867 using manufacturer-suggested cut-offs and 0.929 using optimised cut-offs. For discriminating symptomatic subjects, this value was 0.915 using optimised cut-offs.

CONCLUSIONS

Seroprevalence for SARS-CoV-2 in this population of hospital workers was overall about 10%, with an excess prevalence in roles and departments associated with contacts with COVID-19 patients.

摘要

背景

2020 年初,SARS-CoV-2 疫情迅速蔓延,意大利国家卫生系统不堪重负,医院被认为是感染传播的高风险场所。我们探索了疫情中心的一家单一医院所有员工的特定抗体血清阳性率,以确定医院环境中的风险区域,并评估抗体检测的有用性。

目的

本研究旨在探索单一医院工作人员队列中 SARS-CoV-2 的血清阳性率。

方法

我们邀请所有医院工作人员填写问卷并接受 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 的血液检测,使用两种商业检测(DiaSorin 和 Abbott)。根据两种检测方法的单独和联合结果,按人口统计学和职业特征对血清阳性率进行总体和分类评估。

结果

这项研究共纳入 1562 名医院工作人员(合格人群的 95%)。总体而言,DiaSorin 检测中 153 名(9.8%)参与者 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 阳性,Abbott 检测中 150 名(9.6%)参与者 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 阳性;两种检测方法均为阳性的有 123 例(7.9%),至少有一种检测方法为阳性的有 180 例(11.5%)。与 SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性相关的因素包括:吸烟、在急诊或内科部门工作、从事医疗保健工作、有 COVID-19 患者或有 COVID-19 症状的亲属、进行过鼻咽拭子检测。使用制造商建议的临界值,检测的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.867,使用优化临界值时为 0.929,可准确区分感染病例。使用优化临界值时,用于区分有症状患者的 AUC 为 0.915。

结论

该医院工作人员群体的 SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性率总体约为 10%,与接触 COVID-19 患者的角色和部门相关的比例较高。