McCullough Mary A, Cairns Ashley L, Shin Jaewook, Appelbaum Rachel D, Couture Daniel E, Nunn Andrew M, Miller Preston R, Martin Robert S, Carmichael Samuel P
Department of Surgery, 12279Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Am Surg. 2023 Jan;89(1):79-83. doi: 10.1177/00031348211011141. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is an increasingly detected pattern in trauma with significant morbidity, putting patients at risk for subsequent stoke. Complex screening protocols exist to determine who should undergo CT angiography of the neck (CTAN) to evaluate for BCVI. Once identified, stroke incidence may be reduced with appropriate treatment across grades. We hypothesize that an expanded and simplified method for identifying patients with clinical suspicion for BCVI based upon injury above the clavicle (ATC) will illustrate a previously undiagnosed cohort of patients.
A single-institution retrospective review of adult (age ≥18 years) blunt trauma patients with BCVI from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019 was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center. Patients undergoing CTAN were divided into 2 groups based upon qualification by either the expanded Denver criteria or clinical evidence of any injury ATC.
A total of 219 patients were diagnosed with BCVI (25 566 blunt trauma admissions, .9% incidence). Seventeen patients (8%) who did not satisfy expanded Denver were diagnosed with BCVI by ATC, most commonly undergoing CTAN due to facial trauma (n = 8). There were no differences in distribution of carotid artery injuries (CAI) and vertebral artery injuries (VAI) in the expanded Denver criteria group compared to the ATC group.
CTAN for blunt trauma with any injury ATC is an easy-to-use screening tool and may be seamlessly included with initial whole-body imaging.
钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)在创伤中越来越多地被检测到,具有显著的发病率,使患者面临随后中风的风险。存在复杂的筛查方案来确定谁应该接受颈部CT血管造影(CTAN)以评估BCVI。一旦确诊,通过适当的分级治疗可以降低中风发生率。我们假设,一种基于锁骨以上损伤(ATC)来识别临床怀疑有BCVI患者的扩展且简化的方法,将揭示一群以前未被诊断的患者。
在一家三级学术医疗中心,对2010年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间患有BCVI的成年(年龄≥18岁)钝性创伤患者进行了单机构回顾性研究。接受CTAN的患者根据扩展的丹佛标准或任何ATC损伤的临床证据进行分组。
共有219例患者被诊断为BCVI(25566例钝性创伤入院患者,发病率为0.9%)。17例(8%)不符合扩展丹佛标准的患者通过ATC被诊断为BCVI,最常见的是因面部创伤接受CTAN检查(n = 8)。与ATC组相比,扩展丹佛标准组的颈动脉损伤(CAI)和椎动脉损伤(VAI)分布没有差异。
对有任何ATC损伤的钝性创伤进行CTAN检查是一种易于使用的筛查工具,并且可以无缝纳入初始全身成像中。