Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jul 15;335:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.04.022. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
Histologic evidence is required for a definitive diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) by published guidelines; however, the sporadic nature of the disease may produce false negative biopsy results, causing CS to be underdiagnosed. We sought to establish a clinical category of CS absent histologic findings.
Patients evaluated for CS were stratified into 3 groups: probable CS and definite CS based on Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) criteria and presumed CS, ie, patients without any histologic evidence of sarcoidosis, but with unexplained high-grade atrioventricular block or ventricular arrhythmia and findings suggestive of CS on either cardiac magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography. The primary end point was hospitalization-free and overall survival at 10 years.
A total of 383 patients were included in the study: 59, definite CS; 223, probable CS; and 101, presumed CS (62, isolated CS and 39, systemic CS). Compared with patients meeting HRS criteria for CS, patients with presumed CS had lower odds of New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms (odds ratio [OR], 0.44 [95% CI, 0.23-0.83]; P = .01) but greater odds of previous ventricular tachycardia (OR, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.4-4.0]; P = .001) or history of resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest (OR, 2.9 [95% CI, 1.0-8.6]; P = .05). Hospitalization-free and overall survival were similar among groups (P = .51 and P = .71, respectively).
Clinical categorization of patients with presumed CS identified a high-risk cohort comparable to patients with histologic evidence of disease, although caution should be exercised in reaching this diagnosis without paying due diligence to the differential diagnosis.
根据已发表的指南,组织学证据是心脏结节病(CS)明确诊断所必需的;然而,该病的散发性可能导致假阴性活检结果,从而导致 CS 漏诊。我们试图建立一种缺乏组织学发现的 CS 临床分类。
根据心律学会(HRS)标准,将评估 CS 的患者分层为 3 组:可能 CS 和明确 CS,以及假定 CS,即没有任何结节病组织学证据,但存在不明原因的高级房室传导阻滞或室性心律失常,并且心脏磁共振成像或正电子发射断层扫描有 CS 的表现。主要终点是 10 年时无住院和总生存率。
共纳入 383 例患者:59 例为明确 CS;223 例为可能 CS;101 例为假定 CS(62 例为单纯 CS,39 例为系统性 CS)。与符合 CS HRS 标准的患者相比,假定 CS 患者纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级 III 或 IV 级症状的可能性较低(比值比 [OR],0.44 [95%置信区间,0.23-0.83];P =.01),但室性心动过速(OR,2.4 [95%置信区间,1.4-4.0];P =.001)或经抢救的心脏骤停史(OR,2.9 [95%置信区间,1.0-8.6];P =.05)的可能性更高。各组之间无住院和总生存率无差异(P =.51 和 P =.71)。
假定 CS 患者的临床分类确定了一个与有组织学证据疾病患者相当的高危人群,尽管在不认真考虑鉴别诊断的情况下做出此诊断时应谨慎。