Bae Go Eun, Choi Arom, Beom Jin Ho, Kim Min Joung, Chung Hyun Soo, Min In Kyung, Chung Sung Phil, Kim Ji Hoon
Department of Emergency Medicine.
Department of Research Affairs, Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 23;100(16):e25425. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025425.
The American Heart Association guidelines recommend switching chest compression providers at least every 2 min depending on their fatigue during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Although the provider's heart rate is widely used as an objective indicator for detecting fatigue, the accuracy of this measure is debatable.
This study was designed to determine whether real-time heart rate is a measure of fatigue in compression providers.
A simulation-based prospective interventional study including 110 participants.
Participants performed chest compressions in pairs for four cycles using advanced cardiovascular life support simulation. Each participant's heart rate was measured using wearable healthcare devices, and qualitative variables regarding individual compressions were obtained from computerized devices. The primary outcome was correct depth of chest compressions. The main exposure was the change in heart rate, defined as the difference between the participant's heart rate during individual compressions and that before the simulation was initiated.
With a constant compression duration for one cycle, the overall accuracy of compression depth significantly decreased with increasing heart rate. Female participants displayed significantly decreased accuracy of compression depth with increasing heart rate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-0.98; P < .001). Conversely, male participants displayed significantly improved accuracy with increasing heart rate (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02-1.04; P < .001).
Increasing heart rate could reflect fatigue in providers performing chest compressions with a constant duration for one cycle. Thus, provider rotation should be considered according to objectively measured fatigue during CPR.
美国心脏协会指南建议,在心肺复苏(CPR)期间,根据按压者的疲劳程度,至少每2分钟更换一次胸部按压提供者。尽管按压者的心率被广泛用作检测疲劳的客观指标,但该指标的准确性仍存在争议。
本研究旨在确定实时心率是否可作为按压提供者疲劳程度的指标。
一项基于模拟的前瞻性干预研究,纳入110名参与者。
参与者使用高级心血管生命支持模拟系统,两人一组进行四个周期的胸部按压。使用可穿戴医疗设备测量每位参与者的心率,并从计算机设备获取有关个体按压的定性变量。主要结局是胸部按压的正确深度。主要暴露因素是心率变化,定义为个体按压期间参与者的心率与模拟开始前心率之间的差值。
在一个周期内按压持续时间恒定的情况下,随着心率增加,按压深度的总体准确性显著降低。女性参与者随着心率增加,按压深度的准确性显著降低(优势比[OR]:0.97;95%置信区间[CI]:0.95 - 0.98;P <.001)。相反,男性参与者随着心率增加,准确性显著提高(OR:1.03;95% CI:1.02 - 1.04;P <.001)。
心率增加可能反映了在一个周期内按压持续时间恒定的情况下进行胸部按压的提供者的疲劳程度。因此,在心肺复苏期间,应根据客观测量出的疲劳程度考虑更换提供者。