Sa-Couto Carla, Sa-Couto Pedro, Nicolau Abel, Lazarovici Marc, Ericsson Christoffer, Vieira-Marques Pedro, Bispo Ingrid
RISE-Health, Community Medicine, Information and Decision Sciences Department (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal.
Center for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications (CIDMA), Department of Mathematics (DMAT), University of Aveiro, Portugal.
Resusc Plus. 2025 May 3;24:100971. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100971. eCollection 2025 Jul.
There is a lack of studies using surface electromyography (sEMG) to objectively assess the impact of rescuer position and arm angle on muscle fatigue during CPR. Additionally, the relationship between anthropometric variables (height and weight) and muscle fatigue remains underexplored.
This study aims to objectively assess muscle fatigue during CPR by analyzing sEMG activation during continuous chest compressions (CCs) across different rescuer positions and arm angles. A secondary objective is to examine correlations between anthropometric variables and muscle fatigue, while also evaluating the impact of CCs quality on fatigue levels.
This international, multicentric, randomized crossover simulation trial included healthcare professionals assigned to one of four rescuer positions: kneeling on the floor, standing, standing on a step stool, and kneeling on a bed. Participants performed two 3-minute trials of continuous CCs at 90° and 105° arm angles. Muscle fatigue was assessed via sEMG, while compression quality was evaluated using manikin-derived data.
A total of 72 participants were included. The 105° arm angle significantly increased muscle fatigue compared to 90° (p < 0.001) across all rescuer positions. Taller and heavier rescuers exhibited lower fatigue for both arm angles (p < 0.05); however, fatigue levels were consistently higher at 105° than at 90°.
Arm angle is a key determinant of rescuer muscle fatigue, with 105° increasing fatigue compared to 90°. Rescuer position alone was not significant, though fatigue was more pronounced in kneeling and elevated positions. Taller and heavier rescuers demonstrated greater endurance but remained affected by suboptimal arm angles.
目前缺乏使用表面肌电图(sEMG)来客观评估救援者姿势和手臂角度对心肺复苏(CPR)期间肌肉疲劳影响的研究。此外,人体测量学变量(身高和体重)与肌肉疲劳之间的关系仍未得到充分探索。
本研究旨在通过分析不同救援者姿势和手臂角度下连续胸外按压(CCs)期间的sEMG激活情况,客观评估CPR期间的肌肉疲劳。第二个目标是研究人体测量学变量与肌肉疲劳之间的相关性,同时评估CCs质量对疲劳水平的影响。
这项国际多中心随机交叉模拟试验纳入了医疗保健专业人员,他们被分配到四种救援者姿势之一:跪在地上、站立、站在脚凳上和跪在床边。参与者在90°和105°手臂角度下进行了两次3分钟的连续CCs试验。通过sEMG评估肌肉疲劳,同时使用模拟人数据评估按压质量。
共纳入72名参与者。在所有救援者姿势中,与90°相比,105°的手臂角度显著增加了肌肉疲劳(p < 0.001)。较高和较重的救援者在两种手臂角度下均表现出较低的疲劳(p < 0.05);然而,105°时的疲劳水平始终高于90°。
手臂角度是救援者肌肉疲劳的关键决定因素,与90°相比,105°会增加疲劳。单独的救援者姿势并不显著,尽管在跪姿和抬高姿势下疲劳更为明显。较高和较重的救援者表现出更强的耐力,但仍受手臂角度不佳的影响。