Saqib Saima, Mugford Gerald, Chan Kevin, Porter Robert
Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN.
Community Health and Humanities, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN.
Cureus. 2021 Mar 15;13(3):e13896. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13896.
Objectives This study examines the practice patterns with respect to the technique of non-oral hydration of infants admitted with bronchiolitis at one Canadian tertiary care institution. Additionally, the authors assess the infants' parents' attitudes regarding hydration through a nasogastric (NG) tube instead of an intravenous (IV) line. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted for all infants admitted with bronchiolitis from May 1, 2016, to April 30, 2018, with a focus on the method of hydration, investigation with chest radiography, and use of IV antibiotics. Parents of infants who received IV fluids during the admission were surveyed by mail to assess their perceptions surrounding their child's experience with IV fluid therapy as well as their attitudes toward NG hydration, particularly in cases of difficult IV access. Results Of the 101 hospitalized infants, 54 received IV fluids and four received NG fluids. Of the 54 eligible for the survey, 17 completed surveys were returned. Parents were likely to consider NG hydration if suggested by their pediatrician. The proportion was extremely or very likely to consider this intervention increased from 29% in a generic situation to 53% in a scenario where there was more than one unsuccessful IV attempt (p=0.03). Conclusions In the institution studied, NG hydration was rarely used. Parents seemed receptive to the idea of NG hydration as an alternative, particularly when IV access is difficult.
目的 本研究考察了加拿大一家三级医疗机构中因毛细支气管炎入院的婴儿非口服补液技术的应用模式。此外,作者通过鼻胃管(NG)而非静脉输液(IV)来评估婴儿父母对补液的态度。方法 对2016年5月1日至2018年4月30日期间因毛细支气管炎入院的所有婴儿进行回顾性病历审查,重点关注补液方法、胸部X光检查以及静脉用抗生素的使用情况。对住院期间接受静脉输液的婴儿的父母进行邮件调查,以评估他们对孩子静脉输液治疗经历的看法以及他们对鼻胃管补液的态度,特别是在静脉穿刺困难的情况下。结果 在101名住院婴儿中,54名接受了静脉输液,4名接受了鼻胃管补液。在54名符合调查条件的婴儿中,共收回17份完成的调查问卷。如果儿科医生建议,父母很可能会考虑鼻胃管补液。在一般情况下,极有可能或非常有可能考虑这种干预措施的比例从29%增加到在多次静脉穿刺未成功的情况下的53%(p = 0.03)。结论 在本研究机构中,鼻胃管补液很少使用。父母似乎愿意接受鼻胃管补液作为一种替代方法,特别是在静脉穿刺困难时。