Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Department of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Esophagus. 2021 Jul;18(3):436-450. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00839-9. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
The traditional way to tackle Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) has been flexible endoscopic septum division (FESD). Recently, the concept of per oral endoscopic myotomy has been found useful for managing diverticular diseases of the esophagus and has been termed DPOEM. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of D-POEM in diverticular disease of the esophagus and to compare it with FESD. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase, for studies reporting clinical success, technical success and adverse events in D-POEM alone or D-POEM comparing with FESD. We computed pooled prevalence for D-POEM alone and risk ratio for D-POEM vs FESD using random effect method with inverse variance approach. Subgroup analysis for ZD, non-ZD and mixed diverticulum was conducted. Totally 19 studies including 341 patients were identified reporting on D-POEM. The pooled clinical, technical success and adverse event rates for D-POEM were 87.07%, 95.19% and 10.22%, respectively. The clinical success was significantly better than FESD while the technical success, adverse event rate, procedure time and length of hospital stay were comparable with FESD. The recurrence rate was negligible for D-POEM compared to FESD. On subgroup analysis by dividing into three groups of ZD, non-ZD and mixed, there was no difference between clinical, technical success and adverse event rate among the three groups. D-POEM is an effective and safe technique among both ZD and non-ZD patients and has better clinical success than FESD.
传统治疗 Zenker 憩室(ZD)的方法是经口内镜下隔切开术(FESD)。最近,经口内镜肌切开术(DPOEM)的概念被发现对治疗食管憩室疾病很有用,并被称为 DPOEM。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估 DPOEM 治疗食管憩室疾病的疗效和安全性,并将其与 FESD 进行比较。我们系统地检索了 PubMed 和 Embase,以评估单独使用 D-POEM 或与 FESD 比较的临床成功率、技术成功率和不良事件。我们使用随机效应方法和倒数方差法计算了单独使用 D-POEM 的汇总患病率和 D-POEM 与 FESD 的风险比。对 ZD、非 ZD 和混合憩室进行了亚组分析。总共确定了 19 项研究,共 341 例患者报告了 D-POEM。D-POEM 的汇总临床、技术成功率和不良事件发生率分别为 87.07%、95.19%和 10.22%。D-POEM 的临床成功率明显优于 FESD,而技术成功率、不良事件发生率、手术时间和住院时间与 FESD 相当。与 FESD 相比,D-POEM 的复发率可以忽略不计。通过将其分为 ZD、非 ZD 和混合三组进行亚组分析,三组之间的临床、技术成功率和不良事件发生率没有差异。D-POEM 是一种有效且安全的技术,适用于 ZD 和非 ZD 患者,其临床成功率优于 FESD。