• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感知有目的和娱乐性智能手机使用在物理治疗中的作用:随机对照试验。

Perception of Purposeful and Recreational Smartphone Use in Physiotherapy: Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany.

PT Akademie Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 21;9(4):e25717. doi: 10.2196/25717.

DOI:10.2196/25717
PMID:33881402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8100886/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many people constantly use their smartphones in all kinds of situations. Often smartphones are used in a meaningful and targeted way, but frequently they are used as a pastime without any purpose. This also applies to patients and therapists in treatment situations.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate how purposeful smartphone use compared with recreational smartphone use (by a physiotherapist or by a patient) influenced the perception of a physiotherapeutic treatment situation. We examined the impact of smartphone use during a physiotherapy session on the perception of the physiotherapist, evaluation of attentiveness, and evaluation of smartphone use in physiotherapy in general.

METHODS

Members of various music and sports clubs were invited to participate in an online randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions. They watched a video in which a physiotherapeutic treatment was shown and in which a smartphone was used or not used in the following four different ways: (1) therapeutically purposeful use, (2) recreational use by the physiotherapist (looking at the phone from time to time with no therapeutic purpose), (3) recreational use by the patient, and (4) no smartphone use (control condition). After watching the video, the participants indicated their perception of the physiotherapist's professional competence, social competence, and empathetic behavior. They also rated the physiotherapist's and patient's attentiveness and evaluated the usage of smartphones generally in physiotherapy.

RESULTS

The analysis included 118 participants (63 women and 55 men). When the physiotherapist used the smartphone in a purposeful way, the physiotherapist was perceived as more professionally competent (P=.007), socially competent (P=.03), and empathetic (P=.04) than if the physiotherapist used it with no therapeutic purpose. These effects occurred because recreational smartphone use by the physiotherapist was evaluated more negatively than the behavior in the control condition (professional competence: P=.001; social competence: P=.03; empathy: P=.04). Moreover, when the physiotherapist used the smartphone in a recreational way, the physiotherapist was perceived as being less attentive (P<.001). Likewise, when the patient used the smartphone in a recreational way, the patient was perceived as being less attentive (P<.001). Finally, smartphone use in physiotherapy was rated as more positive in general when the smartphone was used in a purposeful way compared with the conditions in which the physiotherapist or patient looked at the smartphone with no therapeutic purpose (P<.001). This positive evaluation occurred because purposeful use led to a more positive rating than no smartphone use (P<.001, R=0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Smartphones are only appropriate for therapists and patients if they are used directly for a therapeutic purpose. Otherwise, it is better not to use smartphones during treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

AsPredicted (aspredicted.org) #24740; https://aspredicted.org/blind.php?x=vv532i.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/8100886/b7dc0d80c755/mhealth_v9i4e25717_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/8100886/251993306dc1/mhealth_v9i4e25717_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/8100886/f0cfd29de810/mhealth_v9i4e25717_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/8100886/60bee72ca905/mhealth_v9i4e25717_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/8100886/b7dc0d80c755/mhealth_v9i4e25717_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/8100886/251993306dc1/mhealth_v9i4e25717_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/8100886/f0cfd29de810/mhealth_v9i4e25717_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/8100886/60bee72ca905/mhealth_v9i4e25717_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbe5/8100886/b7dc0d80c755/mhealth_v9i4e25717_fig4.jpg
摘要

背景

许多人在各种情况下都不断使用智能手机。通常情况下,智能手机的使用是有意义和有针对性的,但也经常会被当作一种消遣,没有任何目的。这种情况也适用于治疗环境中的患者和治疗师。

目的

本研究旨在探讨有目的的智能手机使用(由治疗师或患者使用)与娱乐性智能手机使用(由治疗师或患者使用)如何影响对物理治疗治疗情况的看法。我们研究了在物理治疗过程中使用智能手机对治疗师的感知、注意力评估以及对一般物理治疗中智能手机使用的评估的影响。

方法

邀请来自不同音乐和运动俱乐部的成员参加在线随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到以下四个条件之一。他们观看了一段视频,视频中展示了一次物理治疗,治疗师在以下四种不同方式下使用或不使用智能手机:(1)有治疗目的的使用,(2)治疗师无治疗目的的娱乐性使用(偶尔看一下手机),(3)患者的娱乐性使用,(4)不使用智能手机(对照条件)。观看视频后,参与者表示他们对治疗师专业能力、社交能力和同理心的看法。他们还对治疗师和患者的注意力进行了评分,并对一般在物理治疗中使用智能手机进行了评估。

结果

分析包括 118 名参与者(63 名女性和 55 名男性)。当治疗师有目的使用智能手机时,治疗师被认为更专业(P=.007)、更有社交能力(P=.03)和更有同理心(P=.04),而当治疗师没有治疗目的使用智能手机时,治疗师被认为更专业(P=.007)、更有社交能力(P=.03)和更有同理心(P=.04)。这些影响是因为治疗师的娱乐性智能手机使用比对照条件下的行为受到更负面的评价(专业能力:P=.001;社交能力:P=.03;同理心:P=.04)。此外,当治疗师以娱乐性方式使用智能手机时,治疗师被认为注意力不集中(P<.001)。同样,当患者以娱乐性方式使用智能手机时,患者被认为注意力不集中(P<.001)。最后,当智能手机被用于有目的的治疗时,智能手机在物理治疗中的使用被普遍认为更积极,而在治疗师或患者无治疗目的查看智能手机的情况下,智能手机的使用被普遍认为更积极(P<.001)。这种积极的评价是因为有目的的使用比不使用智能手机产生了更积极的评价(P<.001,R=0.42)。

结论

只有当智能手机直接用于治疗目的时,它才适合治疗师和患者使用。否则,在治疗过程中最好不要使用智能手机。

相似文献

1
Perception of Purposeful and Recreational Smartphone Use in Physiotherapy: Randomized Controlled Trial.感知有目的和娱乐性智能手机使用在物理治疗中的作用:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 21;9(4):e25717. doi: 10.2196/25717.
2
Perceived quality of physiotherapist-led orthopaedic triage compared with standard practice in primary care: a randomised controlled trial.与初级保健中的标准做法相比,物理治疗师主导的骨科分诊的感知质量:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jun 10;17:257. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1112-x.
3
The perceptions of Danish physiotherapists on the ethical issues related to the physiotherapist-patient relationship during the first session: a phenomenological approach.丹麦物理治疗师对首次治疗中与医患关系相关的伦理问题的看法:一种现象学方法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Oct 12;12:21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-21.
4
A physiotherapist's perception of their own behavior compared to the perception of their behavior by persons with TBI within the context of telerehabilitation: A self-determination theory perspective.物理治疗师在远程康复背景下对自身行为的感知与 TBI 患者对其行为的感知的比较:自主决定理论视角。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 Aug 3;39(8):1650-1661. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2046219. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
5
An integrative review of the qualities of a 'good' physiotherapist.对“优秀”物理治疗师素质的综合综述。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 Jan;39(1):89-116. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1999354. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
6
Sexual boundaries between physiotherapists and patients are not perceived clearly: an observational study.物理治疗师与患者之间的性界限未被清晰认知:一项观察性研究。
Aust J Physiother. 2008;54(4):275-9. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(08)70007-2.
7
Therapeutic Touch in Exercise Videos: A Randomized Experiment of the Impact on the Evaluation of Therapists' Competence and Viewers' Self-Reliance.健身视频中的治疗性触摸:对治疗师能力评估和观众自立影响的随机实验
Front Sports Act Living. 2019 Sep 25;1:35. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2019.00035. eCollection 2019.
8
An individual rehabilitation program: evaluation by Parkinsonian patients and their physiotherapists.个体化康复计划:帕金森病患者及其物理治疗师的评估
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2014 Nov;170(11):680-4. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
9
Analysis of the Microbiota of the Physiotherapist's Environment.理疗师环境中的微生物组分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Oct;101(10):1789-1795. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
10
Self-evaluated ethical competence of a practicing physiotherapist: a national study in Finland.执业物理治疗师的自我评估道德能力:芬兰的一项全国性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 May 29;21(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00469-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between sociodemographic determinants and nomophobia among physiotherapists in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.沙特阿拉伯王国物理治疗师的社会人口学决定因素与无手机恐惧症之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 14;15(1):25406. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09042-7.
2
The Unveiled Potential of Telehealth Practice in Vestibular Rehabilitation: A Comparative Randomized Study.远程医疗实践在前庭康复中的潜在价值:一项比较随机研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 21;13(23):7015. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237015.

本文引用的文献

1
Therapeutic Touch in Exercise Videos: A Randomized Experiment of the Impact on the Evaluation of Therapists' Competence and Viewers' Self-Reliance.健身视频中的治疗性触摸:对治疗师能力评估和观众自立影响的随机实验
Front Sports Act Living. 2019 Sep 25;1:35. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2019.00035. eCollection 2019.
2
The Effect of Smartphone App-Based Interventions for Patients With Hypertension: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于智能手机应用程序的干预措施对高血压患者的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 19;8(10):e21759. doi: 10.2196/21759.
3
Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial - description of device use and physiotherapy support in the post-hospital phase.
使用技术进行活动和移动能力康复试验(AMOUNT) - 描述医院后阶段的设备使用和物理治疗支持。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Dec;43(24):3454-3460. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1790679. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
4
Significant socio-emotional learning and improvement of empathy in physiotherapy students through service learning methodology: A mixed methods research.通过服务学习方法在物理治疗专业学生中实现显著的社会情感学习和同理心提升:一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Apr 19;90:104437. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104437.
5
App-based Self-administrable Clinical Tests of Physical Function: Development and Usability Study.基于应用程序的自我管理身体功能临床测试:开发和可用性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 27;8(4):e16507. doi: 10.2196/16507.
6
Use of mobile applications in hand therapy.移动应用在手部治疗中的应用。
J Hand Ther. 2020 Apr-Jun;33(2):229-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2019.10.003. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
7
Structural and functional correlates of smartphone addiction.智能手机成瘾的结构和功能相关性。
Addict Behav. 2020 Jun;105:106334. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106334. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
8
Algorithm based smartphone apps to assess risk of skin cancer in adults: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies.基于算法的智能手机应用程序评估成年人皮肤癌风险:诊断准确性研究的系统评价。
BMJ. 2020 Feb 10;368:m127. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m127.
9
Effects of Phubbing: Relationships With Psychodemographic Variables.手机冷落行为的影响:与心理人口统计学变量的关系。
Psychol Rep. 2020 Oct;123(5):1578-1613. doi: 10.1177/0033294119889581. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
10
The role of medical smartphone apps in clinical decision-support: A literature review.医疗智能手机应用在临床决策支持中的作用:文献综述。
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Sep;100:101707. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101707. Epub 2019 Aug 21.