Yang B, Wong Y S, Lam W W, Geng H, Huang C Y, Tang K K, Law W K, Ho C C, Nam P H, Cheung K Y, Yu S K
Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, 2 Village Road, Happy Valley, Hong Kong.
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2021 Apr 30;7(3). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/abfa80.
. This study aims to evaluate the performance of a commercial 1.5 T MR-Linac by analyzing its patient-specific quality assurance (QA) data collected during one full year of clinical operation.. The patient-specific QA system consisted of offline delivery QA (DQA) and online calculation-based QA. Offline DQA was based on ArcCHECK-MR combined with an ionization chamber. Online QA was performed using RadCalc that calculated and compared the point dose calculation with the treatment planning system (TPS). A total of 24 patients with 189 treatment fractions were enrolled in this study. Gamma analysis was performed and the threshold that encompassed 95% of QA results (T95) was reported. The plan complexity metric was calculated for each plan and compared with the dose measurements to determine whether any correlation existed.. All point dose measurements were within 5% deviation. The mean gamma passing rates of the group data were found to be 96.8 ± 4.0% and 99.6 ± 0.7% with criteria of 2%/2mm and 3%/3mm, respectively. T95 of 87.4% and 98.2% was reported for the overall group with the two passing criteria, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between adaptive treatments with adapt-to-position (ATP) and adapt-to-shape (ATS), whilst the category of pelvis data showed a better passing rate than other sites. Online QA gave a mean deviation of 0.2 ± 2.2%. The plan complexity metric was positively correlated with the mean dose difference whilst the complexity of the ATS cohort had larger variations than the ATP cohort.. A patient-specific QA system based on ArcCHECK-MR, solid phantom and ionization chamber has been well established and implemented for validation of treatment delivery of a 1.5 T MR-Linac. Our QA data obtained over one year confirms that good agreement between TPS calculation and treatment delivery was achieved.
本研究旨在通过分析在一整年临床运行期间收集的特定患者质量保证(QA)数据,评估一款商用1.5T MR直线加速器的性能。特定患者QA系统由离线剂量验证(DQA)和基于在线计算的QA组成。离线DQA基于ArcCHECK-MR与电离室相结合。在线QA使用RadCalc进行,该软件计算点剂量并与治疗计划系统(TPS)进行比较。本研究共纳入24例患者,进行了189次治疗分次。进行了伽马分析,并报告了包含95%QA结果的阈值(T95)。计算每个计划的计划复杂度指标,并与剂量测量结果进行比较,以确定是否存在任何相关性。所有点剂量测量的偏差均在5%以内。发现组数据的平均伽马通过率分别为96.8±4.0%(标准为2%/2mm)和99.6±0.7%(标准为3%/3mm)。对于整个组,两种通过标准的T95分别报告为87.4%和98.2%。适应位置(ATP)和适应形状(ATS)的自适应治疗之间未发现统计学显著差异,而骨盆数据类别显示出比其他部位更好的通过率。在线QA的平均偏差为0.2±2.2%。计划复杂度指标与平均剂量差异呈正相关,而ATS队列的复杂度变化比ATP队列更大。基于ArcCHECK-MR、固体模体和电离室的特定患者QA系统已得到良好建立并用于验证1.5T MR直线加速器的治疗投送。我们在一年多时间里获得的QA数据证实,TPS计算与治疗投送之间达成了良好的一致性。