Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Unit of Infectious Diseases, A.O.U. Policlinico Riuniti, Foggia, Italy.
Clin Drug Investig. 2021 May;41(5):437-448. doi: 10.1007/s40261-021-01028-3. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
The study aimed to evaluate the impact of dalbavancin therapy on both hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and treatment-related costs, as well as to describe the clinical outcome, in a retrospective cohort of patients with diverse Gram-positive bacterial infections, hospitalized in different specialty Units.
From July 2017 to July 2019, clinical and sociodemographic data were collected for all hospitalized patients switched to dalbavancin for the treatment of Gram-positive infections. LOS and treatment-related costs were assessed and compared to a hypothetical scenario where the initial standard antimicrobial therapy would have been administered in hospital for the same duration as dalbavancin.
A total of 50 patients were enrolled. The observed infections were: acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs, 12 patients), complicated ABSSSIs (eight patients), osteoarticular infections (18 patients), vascular graft or cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) infections (12 patients). After a median of 14 [interquartile range (IQR) 7-28] days, the in-hospital antimicrobial therapy was switched to dalbavancin 1500 mg. When appropriate, considering the site and the clinical course of the infection, 1500 mg doses were repeated every 14 days until recovery. Overall, 49/50 (98%) patients reported clinical success at the end of therapy. No relapses were observed in 37 patients for whom a median follow-up of 150 (IQR 30-180) days was available. By switching to dalbavancin, a median of €8,259 (IQR 5644-17,270) and 14 hospital days (IQR 22-47) per patient were saved.
In this experience, the use of dalbavancin contributed to shorten LOS and treatment-related costs, especially in difficult Gram-positive infections requiring prolonged therapy.
本研究旨在评估达巴万星治疗对不同科室住院的多种革兰阳性菌感染患者的住院时间( LOS )和治疗相关费用的影响,并描述其临床结局。
2017 年 7 月至 2019 年 7 月,对所有因革兰阳性感染转为达巴万星治疗的住院患者采集临床和社会人口学数据。评估 LOS 和治疗相关费用,并与假设情景进行比较,即初始标准抗菌治疗在医院的持续时间与达巴万星相同。
共纳入 50 例患者。观察到的感染包括:急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染( ABSSSIs , 12 例)、复杂 ABSSSIs ( 8 例)、骨关节炎感染( 18 例)、血管移植物或心血管植入电子设备( CIED )感染( 12 例)。中位 14 天(四分位距 [IQR] 7-28 天)后,住院期间的抗菌治疗转换为达巴万星 1500mg 。在适当的情况下,考虑到感染部位和临床病程,每 14 天重复使用 1500mg 剂量,直至痊愈。总体而言,50 例患者中有 49 例( 98%)在治疗结束时报告了临床成功。在 37 例可获得中位随访 150 天( IQR 30-180 天)的患者中,未观察到复发。转为达巴万星治疗可使每位患者节省中位 8259 欧元( IQR 5644-17270 欧元)和 14 天住院时间( IQR 22-47 天)。
在本研究中,达巴万星的使用有助于缩短 LOS 和治疗相关费用,尤其是在需要长期治疗的严重革兰阳性感染中。